Print Report

CEGL006281 Quercus montana - Quercus alba / Oxydendrum arboreum / Vitis rotundifolia Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Chestnut Oak - White Oak / Sourwood / Muscadine Forest

Colloquial Name: Piedmont Monadnock Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This forest, dominated by Quercus montana, occurs mainly on resistant ridges (monadnocks) over felsic rock of the Piedmont from North Carolina to Alabama. Soils that are well-drained, acidic and nutrient-poor contribute to low species richness. Quercus montana is dominant or codominant in some occurrences with Quercus alba. Other canopy species include Quercus falcata, Carya tomentosa, Quercus marilandica, Quercus coccinea, Nyssa sylvatica, Acer rubrum, Pinus echinata, and Quercus stellata. The subcanopy is dominated by Oxydendrum arboreum with Cornus florida. The herb and shrub layers are sparse, with Vitis rotundifolia as a typical component.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Related forests of the low mountains of North Carolina are more floristically related to forests of the mountains not the Piedmont (e.g., with montane shrubs, such as ~Quercus (montana, coccinea) / Kalmia latifolia / (Galax urceolata, Gaultheria procumbens) Forest (CEGL006271)$$).

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: In typical stands of this association, Quercus montana (= Quercus prinus) is dominant (or codominant in some occurrences with Quercus alba). Other canopy species include Quercus falcata, Carya glabra, Carya tomentosa (= Carya alba), Quercus marilandica, Quercus coccinea, Nyssa sylvatica, Acer rubrum, Pinus echinata, Pinus virginiana, and Quercus stellata. Other subcanopy species include Acer rubrum and Nyssa sylvatica. Species that may be present in the sparse shrub layer include Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium stamineum, Gaylussacia baccata, Gaylussacia frondosa, and Kalmia latifolia. The herb layer contains such species as Vitis rotundifolia, Toxicodendron radicans, Quercus montana, Chimaphila maculata, Danthonia spicata, Desmodium nudiflorum, Schizachyrium scoparium, Tephrosia virginiana, Hieracium venosum, Coreopsis verticillata, and Pteridium aquilinum. Canopy cover ranges from 60% to approaching 100% except following a natural disturbance. Quercus montana contributes 75% of the total tree cover. The subcanopy ranges from sparse to fairly dense, while the shrub and herb layers rarely have 25% cover, and frequently have <5%. Most likely because of the dry, acid, low-nutrient soils, this community has relatively low for species richness, i.e., 34.0 species/0.1 ha average in North Carolina (Peet and Christensen 1980). In addition, of the forest types in NC sampled by Peet and Christensen (1980), this is the only type where tree species contributed more than half (66.5%) of understory cover, e.g., less than 1 m tall.

Dynamics:  Individual tree death is probably the most common natural disturbance to effect composition or structure of this community. Fire and, especially, wind damage are not uncommon events in occurrences of this forest, although the frequency with which each occurs is not known. Most of the species of this community are fire-tolerant. This community may be considered a topo-edaphic climax in most of the situations in which it occurs.

Environmental Description:  This forest occurs mainly on resistant ridges (monadnocks) over felsic rock of the Piedmont and sparingly in the low mountains. It most often is found on resistant ridges (monadnocks) of quartzite, rhyolite, and pyrophyllite; soil series include Nason, Georgeville, Tatum, Uwharrie (Typic Hapludults), Davidson (Rhodic Paleudult), and Goldston (Ruptic-Ultic Dystrochrept) (Schafale and Weakley 1990). These soils are well-drained, acidic, nutrient-poor, and rocky. Community occurrences are found in exposed locations and, consequently, lightning strikes and high winds are common. Fires are probably more common than in most other Piedmont forest types, but most would have little effect on the community because most of the species are fire tolerant and the shrub and herb layers are sparse.

Geographic Range: This forest is found in the Piedmont from North Carolina to Alabama, and sparingly in the low mountains of, at least, North Carolina.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AL, GA, NC, SC




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? Chestnut Oak (52) (USFS 1988)
? Chestnut Oak - Scarlet Oak - Yellow Pine (45) (USFS 1988)
< Chestnut Oak: 44 (Eyre 1980)
? IA7d. Piedmont Monadnock Forest (Allard 1990)
< Oligotrophic Forest (Rawinski 1992)

Concept Author(s): S. Landaal

Author of Description: S. Landaal and M. Pyne

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 02-22-07

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Chafin, L. 2011. Georgia''s natural communities and associated rare plant and animal species: Thumbnail accounts. Based on "Guide to the Natural Communities of Georgia," by Edwards et al. 2013. University of Georgia Press. Georgia Nongame Conservation Section, Wildlife Resources Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources. 125 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Peet, R. K., T. R. Wentworth, M. P. Schafale, and A.S. Weakley. No date. Unpublished data of the North Carolina Vegetation Survey. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Peet, R. K., and N. L. Christensen. 1980. Hardwood forest vegetation of the North Carolina Piedmont. Veroffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung Rubel 68:14-39.
  • Rawinski, T. J. 1992. A classification of Virginia''s indigenous biotic communities: Vegetated terrestrial, palustrine, and estuarine community classes. Unpublished document. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. Natural Heritage Technical Report No. 92-21. Richmond, VA. 25 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1988. Silvicultural examination and prescription field book. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region. Atlanta, GA. 35 pp.
  • Wells, E. F. 1974. A vascular flora of the Uwharrie Wildlife Management Area, Montgomery County, North Carolina. Castanea 39:39-57.
  • White, Jr., R. D., and T. Govus. 2005. Vascular plant inventory and plant community classification for Kings Mountain National Military Park. NatureServe, Durham, NC. 178 pp.