Print Report

CEGL006308 Abies fraseri / (Rhododendron catawbiense, Rhododendron carolinianum) Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Fraser Fir / (Catawba Rosebay, Carolina Azalea) Forest

Colloquial Name: Fraser Fir Forest (Evergreen Shrub Type)

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This community occurs as island-like stands in the southern Appalachian Mountains of eastern Tennessee, and western North Carolina. It occurs on rocky spurs, steep ridges, and south-facing slopes above 1830 m (6000 feet) elevation, often adjacent to montane shrublands. This forest has a canopy strongly dominated by Abies fraseri, occurring over a shrub stratum dominated by evergreen species, typically Rhododendron catawbiense, Rhododendron carolinianum, or Rhododendron maximum. Abies fraseri in the canopy are 17-23 cm in diameter and 10-11 m tall, giving these forests a stunted appearance. Other species that may occur with low coverage in the canopy or subcanopy are Picea rubens, Sorbus americana, Betula alleghaniensis, Prunus pensylvanica. Herbaceous cover is typically sparse. On steep, rocky, northerly slopes, coverage by mosses, liverworts, and lichens can approach 100%. Bryophyte species include Hylocomium splendens, Ptilium crista-castrensis, Sphagnum spp., and Polytrichum ohioense. This forest may grade into forests dominated by Picea rubens and Abies fraseri, montane grasslands, high-elevation shrublands, or high-elevation rock outcrop communities.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This needle-leaved evergreen forest has greater than 75% canopy coverage by Abies fraseri. Abies fraseri in the canopy are 17-23 cm in diameter and 10-11 m tall, giving these forests a stunted appearance. Other species that may occur with low coverage in the canopy or subcanopy are Picea rubens, Sorbus americana, Betula alleghaniensis, Prunus pensylvanica. The tall-shrub stratum is dominated by evergreen species and, although there may be considerable variation, is usually quite dense. Typical shrub dominants include Rhododendron catawbiense, Rhododendron carolinianum, and Rhododendron maximum. Herbaceous cover is typically sparse. On steep, rocky, northerly slopes, coverage by mosses, liverworts, and lichens can approach 100%. Bryophyte species include Hylocomium splendens, Ptilium crista-castrensis, Sphagnum spp., and Polytrichum ohioense. Rare or regionally rare vascular plant species associated with this community include Abies fraseri, Betula papyrifera var. cordifolia, Cardamine clematitis, Glyceria nubigena, Phegopteris connectilis, Poa palustris, Rhododendron vaseyi, Stachys clingmanii, and Streptopus amplexifolius. Rare nonvascular plants include Bazzania nudicaulis, Brachydontium trichodes, Leptodontium excelsum, Metzgeria consanguinea (= Metzgeria temperata), Nardia scalaris, Plagiochila exigua (= Plagiochila corniculata), and Sphenolobopsis pearsonii.

Dynamics:  This community is affected by debris avalanches, wind disturbance and lightning fire. Because of the shallow soils and extreme wind exposure, this forest is susceptible to large blowdowns. Logging and damage by the balsam woolly adelgid has greatly increased the effect of natural windfall. An exotic insect, the balsam woolly adelgid (Adelges piceae), invaded the Southern Appalachians in the late 1950s and has drastically altered the last undisturbed remnants of this community. This exotic pest kills mature Abies fraseri within seven years of infestation. This community is a late-successional type, but it is subject to repeated disturbance. Prunus pensylvanica is a dominant species immediately following disturbance. In later successional stages, Betula alleghaniensis increases in dominance. In areas where mature Abies fraseri has been lost to woolly adelgid infestation, thickets of Rubus spp., Abies fraseri seedlings and saplings, Betula alleghaniensis, and Sorbus americana are dominant. Over time, Picea rubens, Betula alleghaniensis, Abies fraseri, Acer spicatum, and Sorbus americana increase in the tree layer, while Abies fraseri, Menziesia pilosa, Rubus idaeus ssp. strigosus, and Sambucus racemosa increase in the shrub layer (White et al. 1993). Succession is especially slow after severe disturbance such as logging and slash fires. The most severely disturbed sites are predominately Prunus pensylvanica and Rubus spp. and may remain in a non-forested stage of succession for 60 years or more.

Environmental Description:  These forests occur on rocky spurs, steep ridges, and south-facing slopes above 1830 m (6000 feet) elevation, often adjacent to montane shrublands. These forests occur on all topographic positions except the steepest rocky cliffs of the highest summits. Soils that support this community are classified as Inceptisols and are shallow, rocky, and often have a thick organic layer. Moisture regimes are mesic to wet, due to high rainfall, abundant cloud cover, fog deposition, and low temperatures. This forest may grade into forests dominated by Picea rubens and Abies fraseri, montane grasslands, high-elevation shrublands, or high-elevation rock outcrop communities.

Geographic Range: This community occurs as island-like stands on the highest areas, above 1830 m (6000 feet), in the southern Appalachian Mountains of eastern Tennessee, western North Carolina, and southwestern Virginia. It is extremely limited in distribution and is restricted to the following mountain areas: Great Smoky Mountains, Black Mountains, Balsam Mountain, Plott Balsam Mountain, Grandfather Mountain, and Mount Rogers (Ramseur 1960).

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  NC, TN




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G1

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Abies fraseri / (Rhododendron catawbiense, Rhododendron carolinianum) Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2009a)
? Fraser Fir (6) (USFS 1988)
< IA4b. Fraser Fir Forest (Allard 1990)
< Red Spruce - Fraser Fir: 34 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): K.D. Patterson

Author of Description: K.D. Patterson

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 11-04-94

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Anderson, L. E., H. A. Crum, and W. R. Buck. 1990. List of mosses of North America north of Mexico. The Bryologist 93:448-499.
  • Braun, E. L. 1950. Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Hafner Press, New York. 596 pp.
  • Brown, D. M. 1941. Vegetation of Roan Mountain: A phytosociological and successional study. Ecological Monographs 11:61-97.
  • Bruck, R. I. 1988. Interactions of spruce-fir pathogens, insects, and ectomychorrhizae on the etiology and epidemiology of boreal montane forest decline in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Pages 133-143 in: Proceedings of the US/FRG research symposium: Effects of atmospheric pollutants on the spruce-fir forests of the eastern U.S. and the Federal Republic of Germany. General Technical Report NE-120. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
  • Busing, R. T., E. E. C. Clebsch, C. C. Eagar, and E. F. Pauley. 1988. Two decades of change in a Great Smoky Mountains spruce-fir forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 115:25-31.
  • Crandall, D. L. 1958. Ground vegetation patterns of the spruce-fir area of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ecological Monographs 28:337-360.
  • Davis, J. H., Jr. 1930. Vegetation of the Black Mountains of North Carolina: An ecological study. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 45:291-318.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2009a. A vegetation classification for the Appalachian Trail: Virginia south to Georgia. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. In-house analysis, March 2009.
  • McLeod, D. E. 1988. Vegetation patterns, floristics, and environmental relationships in the Black and Craggy mountains of North Carolina. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 222 pp.
  • NCNHP [North Carolina Natural Heritage Program]. 1993. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program biennial protection plan. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 120 pp.
  • Nicholas, N. S., S. M. Zedaker, C. Eagar, and F. T. Bonner. 1992. Seedling recruitment and stand regeneration in spruce-fir forests of the Great Smoky Mountains. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 119:289-299.
  • Oosting, H. J., and W. D. Billings. 1951. A comparison of virgin spruce-fir forest in the Northern and Southern Appalachian system. Ecology 32:84-103.
  • Ramseur, G. S. 1960. The vascular flora of high mountain communities of the Southern Appalachians. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 76:82-112.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1988. Silvicultural examination and prescription field book. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region. Atlanta, GA. 35 pp.
  • Weakley, A. S., compiler. 1993. Natural Heritage Program list of the rare plant species of North Carolina. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh. 79 pp.
  • White, P. 1984a. Impacts of cultural and historic resources on natural diversity: Lessons from Great Smoky Mountains National Park, North Carolina and Tennessee. Pages 119-132 in: J. L. Cooley and J. H. Cooley, editors. 1984. Natural diversity in forest ecosystems. Proceedings of a workshop. University of Georgia, Institute of Ecology, Athens. 282 pp.
  • White, P. S., E. R. Buckner, J. D. Pittillo, and C. V. Cogbill. 1993. High-elevation forests: Spruce-fir forests, northern hardwoods forests, and associated communities. Pages 305-337 in: W. H. Martin, S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht, editors. Biodiversity of the southeastern United States: Upland terrestrial communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • White, P. S., and S. T. A. Pickett. 1985. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: An introduction. Pages 3-13 in: P. S. White and S. T. A. Pickett, editors. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
  • White, P. S., editor. 1984b. The Southern Appalachian spruce-fir ecosystem: Its biology and threats. Research/Resource Management Report SER-71. USDI National Park Service. 268 pp.
  • Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26:1-80.