Print Report

CEGL002407 Acer rubrum - Fraxinus pennsylvanica / Carex spp. / Climacium americanum Seepage Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Red Maple - Green Ash / Sedge species / American Tree Moss Seepage Forest

Colloquial Name: Red Maple Seepage Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This red maple forested seep community type can be found in the Ozarks region of the midwestern United States. Stands occur on terraces or floodplains that are relatively flat to gently sloping. The source of water is from a combination of groundwater seepage and rainwater. The soils in this forested fen are somewhat poorly drained, ranging seasonally from saturated to moist with a pH above 6.0. They are deep (100+ cm) and equivalent to wet-mesic bottomland soils. The parent material is alluvium. Hydrophytic plants dominate the vegetation. The overstory is composed of mixed deciduous bottomland hardwoods closed canopy that is 20-30 m tall. Typical tree dominants include Acer rubrum, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, and Carpinus caroliniana. Other tree associates include Ulmus rubra and Diospyros virginiana. The subcanopy is medium to tall in height (5-10 m) and is generally well-developed. Vines and shrubs are often present and they form entangled thickets. Species present include Lindera benzoin. The ground cover is composed of mixed sedges, ferns, and forbs. Species present include Carex lurida, Carex tribuloides, Gentiana andrewsii, Onoclea sensibilis, Dichanthelium clandestinum, Pedicularis lanceolata, Rudbeckia fulgida var. umbrosa, Scirpus polyphyllus, Solidago gigantea, and Solidago rugosa. Dense hummocks of mosses are often prominent in areas of shallow ponding. Species include Climacium americanum and Thuidium delicatulum.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: The concept of the type is taken from the Missouri state type Forested Fen (Nelson 1985). The concept of this type is not clear, as the type may represent a human-modified fen (M. Leahy pers. comm. 2000). This type may be a special feature of other, more extensive wetlands.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The overstory is composed of mixed deciduous bottomland hardwoods that form a closed canopy 20-30 m tall. Typical tree dominants include Acer rubrum, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, and Carpinus caroliniana. Other tree associates include Ulmus rubra and Diospyros virginiana. The subcanopy is medium to tall in height (5-10 m) and is generally well-developed. Vines and shrubs are often present and they form entangled thickets. Species present include Lindera benzoin. The ground cover is composed of mixed sedges, ferns, and forbs. Species present include Carex lurida, Carex tribuloides, Gentiana andrewsii, Onoclea sensibilis, Dichanthelium clandestinum (= Panicum clandestinum), Pedicularis lanceolata, Rudbeckia fulgida var. umbrosa, Scirpus polyphyllus, Solidago gigantea, and Solidago rugosa. Dense hummocks of mosses are often prominent in areas of shallow ponding. Species include Climacium americanum and Thuidium delicatulum (Nelson 1985).

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  Stands occur on terraces or floodplains that are relatively flat to gently sloping. Soils are at least partially saturated with water, which originates from a combination of groundwater seepage and rainwater. Soils are somewhat poorly drained, ranging from seasonally saturated to moist with a pH above 6.0. They are deep (100+ cm) and equivalent to wet-mesic bottomland soils. The parent material is alluvium. Bedrock is not detectable (Nelson 1985).

Geographic Range: This red maple forested fen community type can be found in the Ozarks region of the midwestern United States, and perhaps in localized parts of the Interior Plateau, such as Indiana and Illinois.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AR, IL?, IN?, MO




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GU

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Acer rubrum - Fraxinus pennsylvanica / Carex spp. / Climacium americanum Forest (Faber-Langendoen 2001)
= Forested Fen (Nelson 1985)

Concept Author(s): P.W. Nelson (1985)

Author of Description: P. Nelson, J. Drake and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-21-00

  • Chastain, R. A., M.A. Struckhoff, K. W. Grabner, E. D. Stroh, H. He, D. R. Larsen, T. A. Nigh, and J. Drake. 2006. Mapping vegetation communities in Ozark National Scenic Riverways: Final technical report to the National Park Service. Open-File Report 2006-1354. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA. 90 pp. plus appendices.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Homoya, M. A., J. Aldrich, J. Bacone, L. Casebere, and T. Post. 1988. Indiana natural community classification. Indiana Natural Heritage Program, Indianapolis, IN. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Leahy, Mike. Personal communication. Missouri Natural Heritage Database, Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Nelson, P. 2010. The terrestrial natural communities of Missouri. Revised edition. Missouri Natural Areas Committee, Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
  • Nelson, P. W. 1985. The terrestrial natural communities of Missouri. Missouri Natural Areas Committee, Jefferson City. 197 pp. Revised edition, 1987.
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.