Print Report

CEGL006422 Juniperus virginiana / Corydalis sempervirens Cliff Sparse Vegetation

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Eastern Red-cedar / Rock Harlequin Cliff Sparse Vegetation

Colloquial Name: Eastern Temperate Acidic Cliff

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This sparsely vegetated cliff association occurs in the oak - pine - hemlock forest region of the northeastern U.S. The setting is dry vertical exposures of resistant acidic bedrock such as granite, quartzite, sandstone, shale or schist, with little or no soil development. These cliffs are mostly dry but may contain small areas of seepy conditions, with associated floristic variation. The patchy vegetation is restricted to cracks and crevices and can vary from well-vegetated to barren across the cliff face. In most cases, overall cover averages less than 25%. The association presents itself as a mixture of open rock, scrubby trees and shrubs, herbaceous plants, and bryoids. Typical tree species include Juniperus virginiana, Fraxinus americana, Acer rubrum, and Betula papyrifera; none usually grow very large. Individuals of additional tree species from the surrounding forest may also be present; these include Tsuga canadensis, Quercus spp., and Carya spp. Rubus odoratus, Rubus allegheniensis, and Rhus copallinum are representative shrubs. Woody vines include Vitis aestivalis and Parthenocissus quinquefolia. Herbaceous composition varies; typical species include Deschampsia flexuosa, Danthonia spicata, Campanula rotundifolia, Aquilegia canadensis, Corydalis sempervirens, Saxifraga virginiensis, and Woodsia ilvensis. Adlumia fungosa may be found in these habitats; Opuntia humifusa occurs in some of the most southerly occurrences of this association.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The patchy vegetation is restricted to cracks and crevices and can vary from well-vegetated to barren across the cliff face. In most cases, overall cover averages less than 25%. The association presents itself as a mixture of open rock, scrubby trees and shrubs, herbaceous plants, and bryoids. Typical tree species include Juniperus virginiana, Fraxinus americana, Acer rubrum, and Betula papyrifera; none usually grow very large. Individuals of additional tree species from the surrounding forest may also be present; these include Tsuga canadensis, Quercus spp., and Carya spp. Rubus odoratus, Rubus allegheniensis, and Rhus copallinum are representative shrubs. Woody vines include Vitis aestivalis and Parthenocissus quinquefolia. Herbaceous composition varies; typical species include Deschampsia flexuosa, Danthonia spicata, Campanula rotundifolia, Aquilegia canadensis, Corydalis sempervirens, Saxifraga virginiensis, and Woodsia ilvensis. Opuntia humifusa occurs in some of the most southerly occurrences of this association.

Dynamics:  This community consists of drought-tolerant species that take advantage of thin layers of soil that form on narrow ledges or in bedrock crevices (Podniesinski 2005). The successional stages of this type vary with resource availability from bare rock outcrops with no vegetation, to outcrops with lichen cover, to outcrops with lichen and moss cover, to outcrops with grass cover, and eventually to rock outcrops with stunted woodland or forest cover. These stages overlap in time and space, depending on resource availability (Collins and Anderson 1994). Species composition is variable given the limited habitat to support vegetation and the unpredictable nature of plant colonization and establishment. Trees are typically absent from this community, but when present, they are usually stunted and less than 10 m in height (Podniesinski 2005). Tree roots may straddle boulders or run horizontally over rock surfaces as they cannot penetrate the rock surface (Collins and Anderson 1994).

Environmental Description:  This community is found on cliff faces developed on resistant acidic bedrock such as granite, quartzite, sandstone, shale or schist, with little or no soil development. The outcrops are typically vertical to near-vertical. Exposure varies, and moisture regime likewise varies from dry on the exposed faces to moist on more protected or seepy areas. These cliffs may contain small areas of seepage vegetation among the generally dry substrate. [For extensive seepage cliffs, see the cliff seep association ~Drosera rotundifolia - Viola spp. Cliff Sparse Vegetation (CEGL006429)$$.]

Geographic Range: This type is documented from Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania; southward and westward extent has not been determined.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CT, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, VT




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: CEGL006443 merged into CEGL006422.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: No Data Available

Concept Author(s): S.C. Gawler

Author of Description: S.C. Gawler and G.S. Podniesinski

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 06-22-06

  • Anderson, D. M. 1996. The vegetation of Ohio: Two centuries of change. Draft. Ohio Biological Survey.
  • Collins, B. R., and K. H. Anderson. 1994. Plant communities of New Jersey. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. 287 pp.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Metzler, K. J., and J. P. Barrett. 2004. Vegetation classification for Connecticut. Draft. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, CT.
  • Perles, S. J., G. S. Podniesinski, E. Eastman, L. A. Sneddon, and S. C. Gawler. 2007. Classification and mapping of vegetation and fire fuel models at Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2007/076. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 2 volumes.
  • Perles, S. J., G. S. Podniesinski, M. Furedi, B. A. Eichelberger, A. Feldmann, G. Edinger, E. Eastman, and L. A. Sneddon. 2008. Vegetation classification and mapping at Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/133. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 370 pp.
  • Podniesinski, G. 1999. Milford shale barrens red-cedar - prickly pear shrubland community and prickly pear population monitoring plan. Report to the National Park Service, Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, Research and Resource Planning Office. Pennsylvania Science Office of The Nature Conservancy, Middletown, PA. 8 pp.
  • Podniesinski, G. S. 2005. Draft Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area descriptions of dry ridgetops and grassland types. Unpublished report. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program.
  • Podniesinski, G., and J. Kunsman. 1999. Status of the prickly pear cactus (Opuntia humifusa) populations and associated red-cedar - prickly pear shrubland community at the Milford shale barrens after the spring 1999 wildfire. Report to the National Park Service, Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, Research and Resource Planning Office. Pennsylvania Science Office of The Nature Conservancy, Middletown, PA. 4 pp.
  • Sneddon, L., and S. Menard, editors. 2002. International classification of ecological communities: Terrestrial vegetation of the United States, Western Allegheny Plateau. Draft revisions based on contributions of the Western Allegheny Plateau Ecology Group. Unpublished report. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]
  • Thompson, E. H., and E. R. Sorenson. 2005. Wetland, woodland, wildland: A guide to the natural communities of Vermont. The Nature Conservancy and the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 456 pp.