Print Report

CEGL005058 Acer saccharum - Tilia americana - Fraxinus americana / Ostrya virginiana / Geranium robertianum Woodland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Sugar Maple - American Basswood - White Ash / Hophornbeam / Robert''s Geranium Talus Woodland

Colloquial Name: Rich Northern Hardwood Talus Woodland

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: These open, circumneutral woodlands range from the Great Lakes to the Northern Appalachians and Lower New England regions. They typically occur on talus and colluvial slopes where soils are derived from circumneutral to calcareous bedrock, and often extend upslope onto ridges and low summits. The elevation range is from about 150 to 610 m (500-2000 feet) with most occurrences below 365 m (1200 feet), and southerly exposure is common. Soils are thin, patchy and dry. The hardwood canopy is very patchy, with open talus interspersed with wooded areas. Even the wooded areas generally have an open canopy, and canopy closure overall is usually less than 50%, often with stunted trees. Shrubs and herbs are scattered where soil is available; vines are unusually well-represented. Herb cover may be locally extensive on stabilized areas. The bryoid layer is very minor and varies from patches of lichens on the open talus to sparse mosses in wooded areas. The ground cover is boulder talus and deciduous litter. Canopy dominants are typically Acer saccharum and Quercus rubra, with the characteristic but usually subordinate species Ostrya virginiana, Fraxinus americana, and Tilia americana. Where shrubs are even present, they are scattered and clumped and include Cornus rugosa, Acer pensylvanicum, Acer spicatum, Rubus odoratus, Corylus cornuta, Viburnum acerifolium, Staphylea trifolia, and Ribes spp. Vines are locally abundant on talus. Rich-site herbs indicative of these talus slopes include Asplenium platyneuron, Polystichum braunii, Aralia racemosa, Saxifraga virginiensis, Geranium robertianum, Arabis drummondii, Asarum canadense, Carex rosea, Carex sprengelii, Carex platyphylla, and Patis racemosa. This association is distinguished from other deciduous talus and low summit woodlands by the presence of enriched-site species such as Tilia americana and Juglans cinerea in the canopy, and the characteristic rich-site herb species listed above. However, sites do occur that are intermediate between this type and the more acidic oak-birch talus woodlands, ~Betula alleghaniensis - Quercus rubra / Polypodium virginianum Woodland (CEGL006584)$$ and ~Quercus rubra - Betula lenta / Polypodium virginianum Talus Woodland (CEGL006585)$$.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The hardwood canopy is very patchy, with open talus interspersed with wooded areas. Even the wooded areas generally have an open canopy, and canopy closure overall is usually less than 50%. Shrubs and herbs are scattered where soil is available; vines are unusually well represented. Herb cover may be locally extensive on stabilized areas. The bryoid layer is very minor, and varies from patches of lichens on the open talus to sparse mosses in wooded areas. The ground cover is boulder talus and deciduous litter. Canopy dominants are typically Acer saccharum and Quercus rubra, with the characteristic but usually subordinate species Ostrya virginiana, Fraxinus americana, and Tilia americana. Other canopy associates include Acer rubrum, Betula lenta, Betula papyrifera, Betula alleghaniensis, Juglans cinerea, and Ulmus rubra. Where shrubs are even present, they are scattered and clumped and include Cornus rugosa, Acer pensylvanicum, Acer spicatum, Rubus odoratus, Corylus cornuta, Viburnum acerifolium, Staphylea trifolia, and Ribes spp. Vines are locally abundant on talus and include Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Parthenocissus vitacea, Toxicodendron radicans, Clematis virginiana, Clematis occidentalis, Adlumia fungosa, Celastrus scandens, and Polygonum cilinode. Rich-site herbs indicative of these talus slopes include Asplenium platyneuron, Polystichum braunii, Aralia racemosa, Saxifraga virginiensis, Geranium robertianum, Arabis drummondii, Asarum canadense, Carex rosea, Carex sprengelii, Carex platyphylla, and Patis racemosa (= Oryzopsis racemosa). Also present, and less restricted to circumneutral conditions, are Cystopteris bulbifera, Carex pensylvanica, Carex communis, Deschampsia flexuosa, Schizachne purpurascens, Hepatica nobilis var. obtusa (= Hepatica americana), Dryopteris marginalis, Polypodium virginianum, and Athyrium filix-femina.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  Stands occur on talus and colluvial slopes where soils are derived from circumneutral to calcareous bedrock, and often extend upslope onto ridges and low summits. The elevation range is from about 150 to 610 m (500-2000 feet) with most occurrences below 370 m (1200 feet), and southerly exposure is common. Soils are thin, patchy, and dry.

Geographic Range: This woodland ranges from the Great Lakes to the Northern Appalachians and Lower New England regions.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  CT, MA, ME, NB, NH, NJ?, NY, ON, QC?, VT




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: merged

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? Rich talus slope woodland (NAP pers. comm. 1998)
? SNE Circumneutral Talus Forest/Woodland (Rawinski 1984a)

Concept Author(s): Northern Appalachian Planning Team

Author of Description: S.C. Gawler

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-08-05

  • Breden, T. F., Y. R. Alger, K. S. Walz, and A. G. Windisch. 2001. Classification of vegetation communities of New Jersey: Second iteration. Association for Biodiversity Information and New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Office of Natural Lands Management, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton.
  • CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Gawler, S. C. 2002. Natural landscapes of Maine: A guide to vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta, ME.
  • Gawler, S. C., and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural landscapes of Maine: A classification of vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta.
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 2006. The vegetation of Connecticut: A preliminary classification. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Report of Investigations No. 12. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database, Hartford, CT.
  • NAP [Northern Appalachian-Boreal Forest Working Group]. 1998. Northern Appalachian-Boreal Working group discussions. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • Rawinski, T. 1984a. Natural community description abstract - southern New England calcareous seepage swamp. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA. 6 pp.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]
  • Thompson, E. H., and E. R. Sorenson. 2005. Wetland, woodland, wildland: A guide to the natural communities of Vermont. The Nature Conservancy and the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 456 pp.