Print Report
CEGL006548 Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus pennsylvanica - Ulmus americana / Boehmeria cylindrica Floodplain Forest
Type Concept Sentence: This maple - ash swamp forest is found in poorly drained areas in floodplains, such as backswamps, abandoned oxbows, sloughs, and depressions, in the northern Piedmont and Central Appalachians; examples are dominated by variable combinations of the trees Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Acer rubrum, and Acer saccharinum, with Ulmus americana.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: (Red Maple, Silver Maple) - Green Ash - American Elm / Small-spike False Nettle Floodplain Forest
Colloquial Name: Northern Piedmont-Central Appalachian Maple - Ash Swamp Forest
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This swamp forest ranges from New Jersey and Pennsylvania, south to West Virginia and Kentucky, primarily in the Lower New England / Northern Piedmont, Piedmont, and Central Appalachian ecoregions. It occupies poorly drained backswamps, sloughs, abandoned oxbows, and depressions of large-stream and river floodplains. Soils are flooded at least early in the growing season, and water may be ponded in shallow hollows for most of the year. The overstory is dominated by variable combinations of Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Acer rubrum, and Acer saccharinum, with Ulmus americana as a common overstory and understory associate. In Virginia and Maryland, Acer saccharinum is most characteristic of large-river (e.g., the James and Potomac) floodplains, where Acer rubrum is nearly absent. On the smaller order streams that support this type, Acer saccharinum is usually absent. In central Kentucky, Platanus occidentalis may also be a canopy component. The shrub layer is typically very sparse or absent, but Cephalanthus occidentalis may be a component of this stratum. Vines, especially Toxicodendron radicans, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, and Vitis spp., are common. The herb layer is usually moderately dense or dense except in deeper hollows. Boehmeria cylindrica, Impatiens capensis, Cinna arundinacea, Geum canadense, Glyceria striata, Leersia virginica, Polygonum arifolium, Polygonum punctatum, Pilea pumila, Lobelia cardinalis, Saururus cernuus, Commelina virginica, Carex stipata, Carex grayi, Carex tribuloides, Carex crinita, and Carex lupulina are characteristic species. In the northern part of the range, examples may contain patches of Symplocarpus foetidus.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Classification of this associated is supported by analysis of a 1250-plot regional dataset assembled for the NCR vegetation mapping project. In that analysis, this association is represented by 11 Maryland and Virginia plots, which consistently separate from similar swamp forests of the region [see Similar Associations and Dynamics]. However, this type of swamp vegetation is undersampled in the Northeast, and additional plot data would be very useful in making association circumscriptions and descriptions more robust.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: Overstory composition is somewhat limited, with Fraxinus pennsylvanica usually codominant with Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum, or both. Occasional stands vary toward near-monospecific dominance by one of these three species. In Virginia and Maryland, Acer saccharinum is most characteristic of large-river (e.g., the James and Potomac) floodplains, where Acer rubrum is nearly absent. On the smaller order streams that support this type, Acer saccharinum is usually absent. Ulmus americana is a constant minor overstory associate and usually dominates the subcanopy layers when these are developed. Occasional overstory and understory associates include Acer negundo, Betula nigra, Platanus occidentalis, Quercus bicolor, and Quercus palustris. The shrub layer is typically very sparse or absent but may include tree saplings of Carpinus caroliniana as well as Cephalanthus occidentalis, Cornus amomum, and Lindera benzoin. Vines, especially Toxicodendron radicans, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, and Vitis spp., are common. The herb layer is usually moderately dense or dense except in deeper hollows. Boehmeria cylindrica is the most constant herb in 11 Maryland and Virginia plots, averaging 5 to 10% cover. Saururus cernuus and Impatiens capensis are less constant (55% of plots) but may be high-cover patch-dominants where they occur. Other characteristic and occasionally abundant herbs include Cinna arundinacea, Geum canadense, Glyceria striata, Leersia virginica, Polygonum arifolium, Polygonum punctatum, Pilea pumila, Lobelia cardinalis, Ludwigia palustris, Commelina virginica, Carex stipata, Carex grayi, Carex tribuloides, Carex crinita, and Carex lupulina. In the northern part of the range, examples may contain patches of Symplocarpus foetidus. The invasive exotic Lysimachia nummularia is problematic in many stands. At Mammoth Cave National Park (Kentucky), the canopy is dominated by Fraxinus pennsylvanica, with Acer rubrum and Platanus occidentalis also common. The shrub zone is sparse with Cephalanthus occidentalis dominant; the understory is mostly open. The herb layer is dominated by Saururus cernuus. Other common herbs include Carex grayi, Chasmanthium latifolium, Leersia virginica, Ludwigia palustris, and Sagittaria latifolia.
Dynamics: The habitat occupied by this association limits floristic composition to species with high tolerances for relatively deep and prolonged inundation. The relationship between this type and similar types dominated by oaks (e.g., ~Quercus palustris - Quercus bicolor / Carex tribuloides - Carex radiata - (Carex squarrosa) Wet Forest (CEGL006497)$$) is complex and not fully understood. Field observations (VDNH unpubl. data) of mean flooding depths in various communities suggest that some stands of this type occupy habitats that are too deeply flooded to support hydrophytic oaks. The clearest support for this hypothesis is found in large floodplains that support both types of swamp along an apparent hydrologic gradient. At other sites, especially on smaller streams, it appears that these communities may have a successional relationship in which cut-over or formerly cleared stands of oak-dominated swamp forest have regenerated in stands dominated by Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Acer rubrum. Along the Potomac in the Chesapeake and Ohio National Historical Park, there are examples with even dominance of Quercus palustris and Acer saccharinum classified as Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus pennsylvanica - Ulmus americana / Boehmeria cylindrica Forest (CEGL006548).
Environmental Description: This association occurs in poorly drained backswamps, sloughs, abandoned oxbows, and depressions of large-stream and river floodplains. Soils are flooded at least early in the growing season, and water may be ponded in shallow hollows for most of the year. Soils collected from plot-sampling sites are sticky clay or silty-clay loams with gleyed or mottled upper horizons. Chemical analysis indicates moderate acidity (mean pH = 5.1) and moderately high calcium, magnesium, and total base saturation levels. At Mammoth Cave National Park (Kentucky), this association is found in a poorly drained backswamp forest which lies just behind the natural levee of the Nolin River. The vegetation is likely influenced by flooding and by upper stream drainage into this small basin wetland (B. Yahn pers. comm. 2015).
Geographic Range: This community ranges from New Jersey and Pennsylvania, south to West Virginia and Kentucky, primarily in the Lower New England / Northern Piedmont, Piedmont, and Central Appalachian ecoregions.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: DC, KY, MD, NJ, PA, VA, WV
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.686717
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G4
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.3 Temperate Flooded & Swamp Forest Formation | F026 | 1.B.3 |
Division | 1.B.3.Na Eastern North American-Great Plains Flooded & Swamp Forest Division | D011 | 1.B.3.Na |
Macrogroup | 1.B.3.Na.2 Pin Oak - Green Ash - Blackgum Swamp Forest Macrogroup | M503 | 1.B.3.Na.2 |
Group | 1.B.3.Na.2.h <i>Quercus bicolor - Fagus grandifolia - Acer rubrum</i> Swamp Forest Group | G918 | 1.B.3.Na.2.h |
Alliance | A4461 <i>Acer rubrum - Fraxinus pennsylvanica</i> Northeast Alkaline Swamp Forest Alliance | A4461 | 1.B.3.Na.2.h |
Association | CEGL006548 (Red Maple, Silver Maple) - Green Ash - American Elm / Small-spike False Nettle Floodplain Forest | CEGL006548 | 1.B.3.Na.2.h |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus pennsylvanica / Boehmeria cylindrica - Saururus cernuus Forest (Lea 2004)
< Piedmont / Mountain Swamp Forest (Fleming pers. comm.)
< Piedmont / Mountain Swamp Forest (Fleming pers. comm.)
- Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
- Evans, M., B. Yahn, and M. Hines. 2009. Natural communities of Kentucky 2009. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY. 22 pp.
- Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.
- Fleming, G. P. 2002b. Preliminary classification of Piedmont & Inner Coastal Plain vegetation types in Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-14. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 29 pp.
- Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
- Fleming, G. P., K. Taverna, and P. P. Coulling. 2007b. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, eastern region. Regional (VA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2007. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
- Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2003. Preliminary vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2003. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
- Fleming, Gary P. Personal communication. Ecologist, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA.
- Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
- Lea, C. 2004. Draft vegetation types in National Capital Region Parks. Edited by S.C. Gawler and J. Teague. Working draft for review by NatureServe, Virginia Natural Heritage, West Virginia Natural Heritage, Maryland Natural Heritage, and National Park Service. July 2004. 157 pp.
- WVNHP [West Virginia Natural Heritage Program]. No date. Unpublished data. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program, Elkins.
- Yahn, Brian. Personal communication. Ecologist, Kentucky State Nature Preserve Commission, Frankfort.
- Zimmerman, E. A. 2011g. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program. Red Maple - Elm - Willow Floodplain Forest Factsheet. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Community.aspx?=16021] (accessed January 31, 2012)
- Zimmerman, E. A., T. Davis, M. A. Furedi, B. Eichelberger, J. McPherson, S. Seymour, G. Podniesinski, N. Dewar, and J. Wagner, editors. 2012. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Communities.aspx]