Print Report

CEGL003114 Tamarix spp. Ruderal Riparian Shrubland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Tamarisk species Ruderal Riparian Shrubland

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This shrubland association is composed of thickets on banks of streams across the western U.S. and northern Mexico. Stands are dominated by introduced species of Tamarix, including Tamarix ramosissima, Tamarix chinensis, Tamarix gallica, and Tamarix parviflora. Introduced from the Mediterranean, this genus has become naturalized in various sites, including salt flats and other saline habitats, springs, and especially along streams and regulated rivers, where it replaces the native vegetation, such as shrublands dominated by species of Salix or Prosopis or woodlands of Populus spp. An herbaceous layer may be present, depending on the age and density of the shrub layer, which may consist of aggressive exotic species such as Lepidium latifolium.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This association is largely known and described from National Park Service inventory efforts in the Colorado Plateau and Mojave Desert. This is a broadly defined plant association that is composed of many diverse Tamarix spp.-dominated vegetation communities from a wide variety of environments. Muldavin et al. (2000a) described 8 community types that will be reviewed as possible USNVC associations.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This introduced shrubland forms a moderate to dense tall-shrub layer that is solely or strongly dominated by species of Tamarix, including Tamarix ramosissima, Tamarix chinensis, Tamarix gallica, and Tamarix parviflora. Other native shrubs may include species of Salix (especially Salix exigua) and Prosopis, as well as Rhus trilobata and Sarcobatus vermiculatus but with low cover (if shrub species are codominant, then the stand is classified as a natural shrubland). Scattered native trees such as Acer negundo, Salix amygdaloides, Populus spp., or another introduced tree, Elaeagnus angustifolia, may also be present. Depending on stand age and density of the shrub layer, an herbaceous layer may be present. Associated native species include Distichlis spicata and Sporobolus airoides, and introduced species include Agrostis gigantea, Agrostis stolonifera, and Poa pratensis. Introduced herbaceous species such as Polypogon monspeliensis, Conyza canadensis, Lepidium latifolium, and many others have been reported from shrublands in this association.

Dynamics:  Tamarix species are highly competitive and have invaded many riparian and wetland environments in the western U.S. Hansen et al. (1995) report that these shrubs are extremely drought- and salt-tolerant, produce prolific wind-dispersed seeds, can resprout after burning or cutting, and if kept moist, buried or broken branches will develop adventitious roots and grow. Stands seem to favor disturbed and flow-regulated rivers, because the lack of annual overbank flooding and subsequent scouring allows seedlings to become established. However, Tamarix spp. will establish well in pristine areas, too, especially under drought conditions such as experienced by the Colorado Plateau in 2002-2003. Under optimum conditions riparian areas can be converted to a dense thicket in less than 10 years (Hansen et al. 1995). Once established, stands are extremely difficult to eradicate, requiring cutting along with herbicide application on stumps to prevent resprouting (Smith and Douglas 1989), as well as restoration of the original flooding and scouring regime. Many of the national parks in the western states have active programs of tamarisk removal and riparian restoration that have been moderately successful. A biocontrol agent, the northern tamarisk beetle (Diorhabda carinulata), has been used to defoliate tamarisk throughout the southwestern U.S. since 2001 and defoliation has been highly effective (Bateman et al. 2012).

Environmental Description:  These widespread shrublands are common along streams, rivers, and around playas in the western U.S. and Mexico. Elevation ranges from 75 m below sea level to 1860 m above sea level. Tamarix spp. have become naturalized in various sites including riverbanks, floodplains, basins, sandbars, side channels, springs, salt flats, and other saline habitats. Stands grow especially well along regulated rivers where agricultural runoff has increased water salinity and the dam decreases any flushing flows. Tamarix is highly competitive and excludes native riparian species such as Salix and Populus. Along regulated rivers, the absence of regular scouring floods allows Tamarix seedlings to become established. Substrates range from sands to loams, and are nearly always associated with alluvial deposits of sand, gravel or cobbles.

Geographic Range: This semi-natural shrubland is found along drainages in the semi-arid western Great Plains, interior and southwestern U.S. and northern Mexico, from central and eastern Montana, south to Colorado, western Oklahoma and Texas, west to California.

Nations: MX,US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CA, CO, MT, MXCHH, MXCOA, MXSON, NM, NV, OK, TX, UT, WY




Confidence Level: High

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNA

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: > Tamarix chinensis Community Type (Hansen et al. 1995)
? Tamarix pentandra Community Type (Szaro 1989)
? Tamarix ramosissima (Salt cedar) Association (Nachlinger and Reese 1996) [classified within the Disturbed Spring Habitats.]
= Tamarix ramosissima Shrubland (Carsey et al. 2003a)
= Tamarix spp. (Tamarisk thickets) Semi-natural Stands (Sawyer et al. 2009) [63.810.00]
= Tamarix spp. Ruderal Riparian Association (Evens et al. 2014)
= Tamarix spp. Semi-Natural Shrubland Stands (Evens et al. 2012)
= Tamarix spp. Semi-Natural Stands (Tamarisk thickets) (Buck-Diaz et al. 2012)
? Salt cedar series (Paysen et al. 1980)
= Saltcedar Alliance (Muldavin et al. 2000a)
= Tamarisk Scrub (#63810) (Holland 1986b)
= Tamarisk series (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995)

Concept Author(s): Sawyer et al. (2009)

Author of Description: K.A. Schulz, J. Coles and G. Kittel

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 07-14-16

  • Baalman, R. J. 1965. Vegetation of the Salt Plains National Wildlife Refuge, Jet, Oklahoma. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
  • Bateman, H. L., P. L. Nagler, and E. P. Glenn. 2013. Plot- and landscape-level changes in climate and vegetation following defoliation of exotic saltcedar (Tamarix sp.) from the biocontrol agent Diorhabda carinulata along a stream in the Mojave Desert (USA). Journal of Arid Environments 89:16-20.
  • Buck-Diaz, J., S. Batiuk, and J. M. Evens. 2012. Vegetation alliances and associations of the Great Valley ecoregion, California. California Native Society, Sacramento, CA. [http://cnps.org/cnps/vegetation/pdf/great_valley_eco-vegclass2012.pdf]
  • Carsey, K., G. Kittel, K. Decker, D. J. Cooper, and D. Culver. 2003a. Field guide to the wetland and riparian plant associations of Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Clark, D., M. Dela Cruz, T. Clark, J. Coles, S. Topp, A. Evenden, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and J. Von Loh. 2009. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Capitol Reef National Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2009/187. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 882 pp.
  • Cogan, D., M. Reid, K. Schulz, and M. Pucherelli. 2004. Zion National Park, Utah 1999-2003. Vegetation Mapping Project. Technical Memorandum 8260-03-01. Remote Sensing and GIS Group Technical Service Center, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. Appendix F: Vegetation Association Descriptions for Zion.
  • Coles, J., A. Tendick, G. Manis, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, J. Von Loh, and A. Evenden. 2009a. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Arches National Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2009/253. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 544 pp.
  • Coles, J., D. Cogan, D. Salas, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, J. Von Loh, and A. Evenden. 2008a. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Dinosaur National Monument. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR-2008/112. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 814 pp.
  • Coles, J., M. Hansen, and K. Thomas. 2003. Wupatki National Monument, Arizona, vegetation classification and distribution: A USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program study. Southwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report. [in preparation]
  • Drake, S., S. Buckley, M. Villarreal, S. Studd, and J. A. Hubbard. 2009. Vegetation classification, distribution, and mapping report: Tumacácori National Historical Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/SODN/NRR--2009/148. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 136 pp.
  • Evens, J. M., D. Roach-McIntosh, and D. Stout. 2012. Vegetation descriptions for Joshua Tree National Park. Unpublished report submitted to USDI, National Park Service, Mojave Desert Inventory and Monitoring Network. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.
  • Evens, J. M., K. Sikes, D. Hastings, and J. Ratchford. 2014. Vegetation alliance descriptions for Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Death Valley National Park and Mojave National Preserve. Unpublished report submitted to USDI National Park Service, Mojave Desert Network Inventory and Monitoring Program. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.
  • Hansen, M., J. Coles, K. A. Thomas, D. Cogan, M. Reid, J. Von Loh, and K. Schulz. 2004b. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Wupatki National Monument, Arizona, vegetation classification and distribution. U.S. Geological Survey Technical Report. Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ. 229 pp.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Hoagland, B. 2000. The vegetation of Oklahoma: A classification for landscape mapping and conservation planning. The Southwestern Naturalist 45(4):385-420.
  • Holland, R. F. 1986b. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. Unpublished report prepared for the California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame-Heritage Program and Natural Diversity Database, Sacramento. 156 pp.
  • Kearsley, M. J. C., K. Green, M. Tukman, M. Reid, M. Hall, T. J. Ayers, and K. Christie. 2015. Grand Canyon National Park-Grand Canyon / Parashant National Monument vegetation classification and mapping project. Natural Resource Report NPS/GRCA/NRR--2015/913. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 75 pp. plus appendices.
  • MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
  • Muldavin, E., P. Durkin, M. Bradley, M. Stuever, and P. Mehlhop. 2000a. Handbook of wetland vegetation communities of New Mexico. Volume I: Classification and community descriptions. Final report to the New Mexico Environment Department and the Environmental Protection Agency prepared by the New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
  • Nachlinger, J. L., and G. A. Reese. 1996. Plant community classification of the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area, Clark and Nye counties, Nevada. Unpublished report submitted to USDA Forest Service, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Spring Mountains National Recreation Area, Las Vegas, NV. The Nature Conservancy, Northern Nevada Office, Reno, NV. 85 pp. plus figures and appendices.
  • Ortenberger, A. I., and R. D. Bird. 1933. The ecology of the western Oklahoma salt plains. Publications of the University of Oklahoma Biological Survey 5:49-64.
  • Paysen, T. E., J. A. Derby, H. Black, Jr., V. C. Bleich, and J. W. Mincks. 1980. A vegetation classification system applied to southern California. General Technical Report PSW-45. USDA Forest Service, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Berkeley, CA.
  • Peterson, E. B. 2008. International Vegetation Classification alliances and associations occurring in Nevada with proposed additions. Nevada Natural Heritage Program, Carson City, NV. 348 pp.
  • Reid, M. S., and M. E. Hall. 2010. Vegetation classification of Grand Canyon National Park. Draft report submitted to National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Romme, W. H., K. D. Heil, J. M. Porter, and R. Fleming. 1993. Plant communities of Capitol Reef National Park, Utah. USDI National Park Service, Technical Report NPS/NAUCARE/NRTER-93/02. Cooperative Park Studies Unit, Northern Arizona University. 37 pp.
  • Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
  • Sawyer, J. O., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 471 pp.
  • Smith, S. D., and C. L. Douglas. 1989. The ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) in Death Valley National Monument and Lake Mead National Recreation Area: An assessment of techniques and monitoring for saltcedar control in the park system. University of Nevada Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit Report 041/03, Las Vegas. 63 pp.
  • Stevens, J. E., D. S. Jones, and K. J. Benner. 2015. Vegetation classification and mapping project report: Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area. Natural Resource Report NPS/GRYN/NRR--2015/1070. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 350 pp.
  • Stevens, R. L., and C. W. Shannon. 1917. Plant life in Oklahoma. In: C. W. Shannon, editor. Animal and plant life of Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Norman.
  • Szaro, R. C. 1989. Riparian forest and scrubland community types of Arizona and New Mexico. Desert Plants Special Issue 9(3-4):70-139.
  • TNHS [Texas Natural History Survey]. No date. Unpublished data. Texas Natural History Survey, The Nature Conservancy, San Antonio.
  • Tendick, A., J. Coles, K. Decker, M. Hall, J. Von Loh, T. Belote, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2012. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Canyonlands National Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2012/577. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Tendick, A., J. Spence, M. Reid, K. Shulz, G. Kittel, K. Green, A. Wight, and G. Wakefield. 2017. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Rainbow Bridge National Monument. Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRR—2017/1500. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 1464 pp.
  • Thomas, K. A., M. L. McTeague, A. Cully, K. Schulz, and J. M. S. Hutchinson. 2009a. Vegetation classification and distribution mapping report: Petrified Forest National Park. National Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR--2009/273. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 294 pp.
  • Ungar, I. A. 1968. Species-soil relationships on the Great Salt Plains of northern Oklahoma. The American Midland Naturalist 80(2):392-407.
  • Von Loh, J., D. Cogan, K. Schulz, D. Crawford, T. Meyer, J. Pennell, and M. Pucherelli. 2002. USGS-USFWS Vegetation Mapping Program, Ouray National Wildlife Refuge, Utah. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Remote Sensing and GIS Group, Technical Memorandum 8260-02-03. Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO. 225 pp.
  • WNDD [Wyoming Natural Diversity Database]. No date. Unpublished data on file. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
  • Ware, G. H., and W. T. Penfound. 1949. The vegetation of the lower levels of the floodplain of the south Canadian River in central Oklahoma. Ecology 30:478-484.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.