Print Report

CEGL007136 Tsuga canadensis / Rhododendron maximum - (Clethra acuminata, Leucothoe fontanesiana) Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Eastern Hemlock / Great Laurel - (Mountain Sweet-pepperbush, Highland Doghobble) Forest

Colloquial Name: Southern Appalachian Eastern Hemlock Forest (Typic Type)

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: These are forests of lower or protected slopes and terraces with Tsuga canadensis occurring over a dense to patchy shrub stratum of Rhododendron maximum. In the southern Appalachians, this forest occurs at elevations greater than 550 m (1800 feet). In Kentucky, disturbed areas may have abundant Betula lenta and Betula alleghaniensis in the subcanopy. Other canopy species of minor importance may include Liriodendron tulipifera, Tilia americana var. heterophylla, Pinus strobus, Betula lenta, Magnolia fraseri, Acer rubrum, and Fraxinus americana; these would total less than 25% of the canopy cover. In the Southern Blue Ridge, Leucothoe fontanesiana is often a shrub component and sometimes occurs densely. Other typical shrubs can include Ilex opaca, Clethra acuminata, and Kalmia latifolia. Herbs are sparse to moderate, depending on the shrub cover. Typical herbs include Chimaphila maculata, Goodyera pubescens, Medeola virginiana, Hexastylis shuttleworthii, Mitchella repens, Polystichum acrostichoides, Viola blanda, and Galax urceolata. Bryophyte cover is often dense. Stands in the southern Cumberlands of Kentucky and Tennessee would lack Leucothoe fontanesiana; instead, Clethra acuminata is a characteristic shrub of these stands.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: In Kentucky, this association occurs in the eastern part of the state (Appalachian plateaus, Cumberland Mountains).

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Forests with Tsuga canadensis occurring over a dense to patchy shrub stratum of Rhododendron maximum. Other canopy species of minor importance may include Liriodendron tulipifera, Tilia americana var. heterophylla, Pinus strobus, Betula lenta, Magnolia fraseri, Acer rubrum, and Fraxinus americana; these would total less than 25% of the canopy cover. Leucothoe fontanesiana is often a shrub component, and sometimes occurs densely. Other typical shrubs include Ilex opaca, Clethra acuminata, and Kalmia latifolia. Herbs are sparse to moderate, depending on the shrub cover. Typical herbs include Chimaphila maculata, Goodyera pubescens, Medeola virginiana, Hexastylis shuttleworthii, Mitchella repens, Polystichum acrostichoides, and Galax urceolata. Bryophyte cover is often dense. In Kentucky, disturbed areas may have abundant Betula lenta and Betula alleghaniensis in the subcanopy. Stands in the southern Cumberlands of Tennessee would lack Leucothoe fontanesiana.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  Forests of lower or protected slopes and terraces with Tsuga canadensis occurring over a dense to patchy shrub stratum of Rhododendron maximum. In the southern Appalachians, this forest occurs at elevations greater than 550 m (1800 feet).

Geographic Range: This community is found in the Southern Appalachians, from North Carolina west into Kentucky.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  GA, KY, NC, SC, TN




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < Eastern Hemlock: 23 (Eyre 1980)
= Hemlock Community (Caplenor 1965)
< IA5b. Southern Appalachian Hemlock Cove Forest (Allard 1990)

Concept Author(s): K.D. Patterson

Author of Description: K.D. Patterson

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 11-26-97

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Caplenor, D. 1965. The vegetation of the gorges of the Fall Creek Falls State Park in Tennessee. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 40:27-39.
  • Evans, M., B. Yahn, and M. Hines. 2009. Natural communities of Kentucky 2009. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY. 22 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Golden, M. S. 1974. Forest vegetation and site relationships in the central portion of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 275 pp.
  • Golden, M. S. 1981. An integrated multivariate analysis of forest communities of the central Great Smoky Mountains. The American Midland Naturalist 106:37-53.
  • Lorimer, C. G. 1980. Age structure and disturbance history of a Southern Appalachian virgin forest. Ecology 61:1169-1184.
  • McLeod, D. E. 1988. Vegetation patterns, floristics, and environmental relationships in the Black and Craggy mountains of North Carolina. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 222 pp.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Newell, C. L., R. K. Peet, and J. C. Harrod. 1997. Vegetation of Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock Wilderness, North Carolina. Unpublished report to USDA Forest Service. University of North Carolina, Curriculum in Ecology & Department of Biology, Chapel Hill, NC. 282 pp. plus maps.
  • Oosting, H. J., and P. F. Bourdeau. 1955. Virgin hemlock forest segregates in the Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest of western North Carolina. Botanical Gazette 116:340-359.
  • Patterson, K. D. 1994. Classification of vegetation in Ellicott Rock Wilderness, Southeastern Blue Ridge Escarpment. M.S. thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh. 91 pp.
  • Peet, R. K., T. R. Wentworth, M. P. Schafale, and A.S. Weakley. No date. Unpublished data of the North Carolina Vegetation Survey. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Quarterman, E., B. H. Turner, and T. E. Hemmerly. 1972. Analysis of virgin mixed mesophytic forests in Savage Gulf, Tennessee. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 99:228-232.
  • Racine, C. H., and J. W. Hardin. 1975. The vascular flora and vegetation in the Green River Gorge, North Carolina. Castanea 40:319-345.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • White, R. D., Jr. 2006. Vascular plant inventory and ecological community classification for Cumberland Gap National Historical Park. NatureServe, Durham, NC. 246 pp.
  • Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26:1-80.