Print Report

CEGL000848 Pinus ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis Woodland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Ponderosa Pine / Blue Grama Woodland

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This widespread woodland occurs at foothill and lower montane elevations from the southern Rocky Mountains, extending east onto southern Great Plains escarpments, south to the mountains of western Texas, and west to the Colorado Plateau and Mogollon Rim of New Mexico, Arizona and Utah. Sites occur on dry, gentle to steep slopes of all aspects, but are more common on southern and western aspects, especially at higher elevations, which ranges from 1740-2610 m (5700-8550 feet). Substrates are quite variable and include shallow sandy loam soils derived from granitic parent materials, coarse cinder soils, and clayey soil with or without high coarse fragment content. The ground surface is typically characterized by scattered grass patches and litter amid exposed soil. The vegetation is characterized by an open to moderately dense evergreen, needle-leaved tree canopy 10-30 m tall that is typically dominated by Pinus ponderosa. Some stands may be codominated by Pinus edulis. Juniperus spp. may be important subdominants. The shrub canopy is variable and usually low in cover. Ericameria nauseosa, Fallugia paradoxa, and Gutierrezia sarothrae are the most common shrub elements. The typically moderately dense herbaceous layer has greater cover than the shrub layer and is dominated by graminoids. The warm-season, sod-forming shortgrass Bouteloua gracilis dominates the herbaceous layer; Poa fendleriana, Elymus elymoides, and Muhlenbergia montana are all frequent associates but subordinate. Forb cover is typically sparse or well-represented and most commonly includes semi-arid woodland and plains grassland species such as Artemisia carruthii, Sphaeralcea coccinea, Bahia dissecta, Hymenoxys richardsonii, Glandularia bipinnatifida, Lotus wrightii, and Heterotheca villosa.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Bouteloua gracilis is well-represented, or if poorly represented, Juniperus deppeana or Pinus edulis are common. Festuca arizonica is scarce or absent. Pinus ponderosa overstory is often open; shrubs are poorly represented although Artemisia tridentata may be well-represented on some sites.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This ponderosa pine woodland is a broadly defined plant association. Stuever and Hayden (1997a) report 6 phases: the Bouteloua gracilis, Schizachyrium scoparium, Andropogon hallii, Artemisia tridentata, Quercus grisea, and Quercus gambelii phases. Hanks et al. (1983) described 4 phases of the Pinus ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis Habitat Type from northern Arizona. More classification review is needed to further define the relationships between these phases and other similar plant associations. Alexander et al. (1987), DeVelice et al. (1986), and Muldavin et al. (1996) also described phases of this Habitat Type that need further review and crosswalking to the USNVC. Youngblood and Mauk (1985) included stands of this association in their broadly defined Pinus ponderosa / Muhlenbergia montana Habitat Type.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This plant association is characterized by an open to moderately dense evergreen, needle-leaved tree canopy 10-30 m tall that is typically dominated by Pinus ponderosa. Some stands may be codominated by Pinus edulis. Juniperus monosperma, Juniperus osteosperma, Juniperus deppeana, or Juniperus scopulorum may be important subdominants. The shrub canopy is variable and usually low in cover. Ericameria nauseosa, Fallugia paradoxa, and Gutierrezia sarothrae are the most common shrub elements. Other shrubs may include scattered Artemisia tridentata, Ceanothus fendleri, Cercocarpus montanus, Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus, Purshia tridentata, Quercus grisea, Rhus trilobata, and Tetradymia canescens. The typically moderately dense herbaceous layer has greater cover than the shrub layer and is dominated by graminoids. The warm-season, sod-forming shortgrass Bouteloua gracilis dominates the herbaceous layer. Common graminoid associates include Aristida spp., Bouteloua hirsuta, Carex geophila, Elymus elymoides, Hesperostipa comata, Koeleria macrantha, Muhlenbergia montana, Poa fendleriana, or Schizachyrium scoparium. Quercus gambelii may be present in the sparse shrub layer (<10% cover) with low cover (<5%). Forb cover is typically sparse and may include species such as Antennaria spp., Artemisia ludoviciana, Artemisia carruthii, Sphaeralcea coccinea, Bahia dissecta, Hymenoxys richardsonii, Glandularia bipinnatifida, Lotus wrightii, Heterotheca villosa, Erigeron spp., Eriogonum racemosum, Chaetopappa ericoides, Packera neomexicana, and Penstemon spp.

Dynamics:  Both diagnostic species are tolerant of surface fire. Pinus ponderosa develops thick fire-resistant bark that protects it from surface fires (Bradley et al. 1992). Bouteloua gracilis resprouts after burning and is unharmed by fires in years with above normal winter and spring precipitation, but can be severely damaged during drought years (Wright and Bailey 1980). Most Pinus ponderosa stands have relatively frequent fires (every 3-20 years), but fires are less frequent in dry, rocky stands where surface fire is limited by lack of continuous fine fuels (Stuever and Hayden 1997a). Fire-return interval has generally increased because of active fire suppression and historic livestock grazing, which has reduced the fine fuels needed to carry surface fires (Madany and West 1980b, Savage and Swetnam 1990). Absence of fire has led to large accumulations of ground fuel and has likely resulted in denser stands and invasion of less fire-adapted, shade-tolerant species such as Pseudotsuga menziesii. This has likely increased the risk of severe, stand-replacing crown fires.

Environmental Description:  This widespread woodland occurs at foothill and lower montane elevations from the southern Rocky Mountains, extending east onto southern Great Plains escarpments, south to the mountains of western Texas, and west to the Colorado Plateau and Mogollon Rim of New Mexico, Arizona and Utah. Elevation ranges from 1740-2610 m (5700-8550 feet). Sites occur on dry, gentle to steep slopes of all aspects, but are more common on southern and western aspects, especially at higher elevations. Substrates are quite variable and include shallow sandy loam soils derived from granitic parent materials, coarse cinder soils, and clayey soil with or without high coarse fragment content.

Geographic Range: This ponderosa pine woodland occurs in the southern Rocky Mountains, extending east on southern Great Plains escarpments as far as Oklahoma, south to the mountains of western Texas, west to the Colorado Plateau and Mogollon Rim of New Mexico, Arizona, and southern Utah.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CO, NM, OK, TX, UT, WY




Confidence Level: High

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Pinus edulis - P. ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis - Carex spp. Plant Community (Francis 1986)
= Pinus ponderosa - Juniperus / Bouteloua gracilis Plant Association (Johnston 1987)
= Pinus ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis (Stuever and Hayden 1997a)
= Pinus ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis Habitat Type (Fitzhugh et al. 1987)
= Pinus ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis Habitat Type (Alexander et al. 1987)
= Pinus ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis Habitat Type, Bouteloua gracilis Phase (DeVelice et al. 1986)
= Pinus ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis Habitat Type, Bouteloua gracilis Phase (Muldavin et al. 1996)
= Pinus ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis Habitat Type, Pinus edulis Phase (Hanks et al. 1983)
= Pinus ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis Plant Association (Larson and Moir 1987)
= Pinus ponderosa / Bouteloua gracilis Plant Association (Johnston 1987)
= Pinus ponderosa / Carex spp. - Bouteloua gracilis Plant Community (Francis 1986)
= Pinus ponderosa / Muhlenbergia montana Habitat Type (Youngblood and Mauk 1985)

Concept Author(s): M.C. Stuever and J.S. Hayden (1997a)

Author of Description: K.A. Schulz, K.S. King and M.E. Hall

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 10-24-18

  • Alexander, B. G., Jr., E. L. Fitzhugh, F. Ronco, Jr., and J. A. Ludwig. 1987. A classification of forest habitat types of the northern portion of the Cibola National Forest, NM. General Technical Report RM-143. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 35 pp.
  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • Bradley, A. F. 1986a. Artemisia tridentata var. tridentata. In: Fire Effects Information System [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). [http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/]
  • Bradley, A. F., N. V. Noste, and W. C. Fischer. 1992a. Fire ecology of forests and woodlands in Utah. General Technical Report INT-287. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 128 pp.
  • Bruner, W. E. 1931. The vegetation of Oklahoma. Ecological Monographs 1:99-188.
  • CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
  • DeVelice, R. L., J. A. Ludwig, W. H. Moir, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1986. A classification of forest habitat types of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. General Technical Report RM-131. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 59 pp.
  • Diamond, D. D. 1993. Classification of the plant communities of Texas (series level). Unpublished document. Texas Natural Heritage Program, Austin. 25 pp.
  • Fitzhugh, E. L., W. H. Moir, J. A. Ludwig, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1987. Forest habitat types in the Apache, Gila, and part of the Cibola national forests. General Technical Report RM-145. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 116 pp.
  • Francis, R. E. 1986. Phyto-edaphic communities of the Upper Rio Puerco Watershed, New Mexico. Research Paper RM-272. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 73 pp.
  • Hanks, J. P., E. L. Fitzhugh, and S. R. Hanks. 1983. A habitat type classification system for ponderosa pine forests of northern Arizona. General Technical Report RM-97. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 22 pp.
  • Hansen, M., J. Coles, K. A. Thomas, D. Cogan, M. Reid, J. Von Loh, and K. Schulz. 2004a. USGS-NPS National Vegetation Mapping Program: Walnut Canyon National Monument, Arizona, vegetation classification and distribution. U.S. Geological Survey Technical Report. Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ. 219 pp.
  • Hansen, M., J. Coles, K. A. Thomas, D. Cogan, M. Reid, J. Von Loh, and K. Schulz. 2004c. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Sunset Crater National Monument, Arizona, vegetation classification and distribution. U.S. Geological Survey Technical Report. Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ. 188 pp.
  • Hibner, C. D. 2009. Special project soil survey of Bandelier National Monument. Natural Resources Conservation Science. In cooperation with the USDI National Park Service and the New Mexico Agricultural Experiment Station. [in review]
  • Hoagland, B. 2000. The vegetation of Oklahoma: A classification for landscape mapping and conservation planning. The Southwestern Naturalist 45(4):385-420.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Kearsley, M. J. C., K. Green, M. Tukman, M. Reid, M. Hall, T. J. Ayers, and K. Christie. 2015. Grand Canyon National Park-Grand Canyon / Parashant National Monument vegetation classification and mapping project. Natural Resource Report NPS/GRCA/NRR--2015/913. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 75 pp. plus appendices.
  • Larson, M., and W. H. Moir. 1987. Forest and woodland habitat types of northern New Mexico and northern Arizona. Edition 2. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Madany, M. H., and N. E. West. 1980b. Fire history of two montane forest areas of Zion National Park. Pages 50-56 in: M. A. Stokes and J. H. Dieterich, technical coordinators. Proceedings of the fire history workshop; 1980 October 20-24; Tucson, AZ. General Technical Report RM-81. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Muldavin, E. H., R. L. DeVelice, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1996. A classification of forest habitat types of southern Arizona and portions of the Colorado Plateau. General Technical Report RM-GTR-287. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 130 pp.
  • Muldavin, E., A. Kennedy, C. Jackson, P. Neville, T. Neville, K. Schulz, and M. Reid. 2011b. Vegetation classification and map: Bandelier National Monument. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR--2011/438. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Muldavin, E., Y. Chauvin, P. Neville, T. Neville, L. Arnold, P. Arbetan, and A. Fettes. 2012b. A vegetation classification and map: Pecos National Historical Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SOPN/NRTR--2012/601. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Muldavin, E., Y. Chauvin, T. Neville, P. Neville, A. Kennedy, H. Hulse, P. Arbetan, K. Schultz, M. Hall, and M. Reid. 2013c. Vegetation classification and map: El Malpais National Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR--2013/803. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. [http://nhnm.unm.edu/vlibrary/pubs_archive/nhnm/nonsensitive/R13MUL01NMUS.pdf]
  • Reid, M. S., and M. E. Hall. 2010. Vegetation classification of Grand Canyon National Park. Draft report submitted to National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Savage, M., and T. W. Swetnam. 1990. Early 19th-century fire decline following sheep pasturing in a Navajo ponderosa pine forest. Ecology 71(6)2374-2378.
  • Stuever, M. C., and J. S. Hayden. 1997a. Plant associations of Arizona and New Mexico, edition 3. Volume 1: Forests. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region. Habitat Typing Guides. 291 pp.
  • TNHS [Texas Natural History Survey]. No date. Unpublished data. Texas Natural History Survey, The Nature Conservancy, San Antonio.
  • Thomas, K. A., M. L. McTeague, L. Ogden, K. Schulz, T. Fancher, R. Waltermire, and A. Cully. 2010. Vegetation classification and distribution mapping report: Canyon de Chelly National Monument. National Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR-2010/306. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 338 pp.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1986. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of southern New Mexico and central Arizona (north of the Mogollon Rim). USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 140 pp. plus insert.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1987a. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of northern New Mexico and northern Arizona. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 170 pp. plus insert.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1987b. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of Arizona south of the Mogollon Rim and southwestern New Mexico. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 168 pp. plus insert.
  • WNDD [Wyoming Natural Diversity Database]. No date. Unpublished data on file. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Wright, H. A., and A. W. Bailey. 1980. Fire ecology and prescribed burning in the Great Plains - A research review. General Technical Report INT-77. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 61 pp.
  • Youngblood, A. P., and R. L. Mauk. 1985. Coniferous forest habitat types of central and southern Utah. General Technical Report INT-187. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.