Print Report

CST007178 Pinus strobus Forest Plantation

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Eastern White Pine Forest Plantation

Colloquial Name: Eastern White Pine Plantation

Hierarchy Level:  Cultural Subtype

Type Concept: This eastern white pine plantation type is found throughout the northeastern and midwestern United States and adjacent Canada. Stands contain plantations of Pinus strobus that are maintained for the extraction of forest products. Some have been planted as reclamation projects (e.g., following strip-mining). At maturity, the tree canopy is usually dense and contains a monospecific layer of Pinus strobus. Pinus resinosa or Pinus virginiana is occasionally present in small amounts. In older stands or gaps, regenerating trees may include Fagus grandifolia, Acer saccharum, Acer rubrum, and Prunus serotina; Robinia pseudoacacia and Betula lenta are occasionally present. Acer pensylvanicum and Ostrya virginiana are common small trees. The shrub layer is typically sparse and mostly consists of smaller individuals of the tree species. The field layer varies from sparse to absent; it may be locally well-developed in small openings, with variable composition. In some stands, mosses may be abundant. Susceptibility to a variety of pests or diseases, including white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) and southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis), has had some impact on its commercial use.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Native pines exceed 50% and Pinus strobus makes up >25% of the canopy and exceeds both Pinus banksiana and Pinus resinosa. In older stands, or in canopy gaps, native regeneration includes hardwoods such as Acer rubrum, Acer saccharum, and Fagus grandifolia, as well as the conifers Picea rubens and/or Tsuga canadensis. Acer pensylvanicum may be present as a small tree. Shrubs and herbs are typically few.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: There was a lot of planting of eastern white pine from the 1930s into the 1950s, but there has been very little planting since then (P. Manion pers. comm. 2001). On the Daniel Boone National Forest of Kentucky, Pinus strobus plantings are of limited extent and are related to wildlife plantings. In the southern part of this type''s range, there has been some damage from southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis). These plantations have been observed in the Peters Mountain area (James River Ranger District) and various other sites in the George Washington and Jefferson national forests.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: No Data Available

Dynamics:  Pinus strobus is susceptible to a variety of pests and diseases, including white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) and southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis), which have had some impact on its commercial use. Blister rust was a problem on young plantations but is not much of a problem in larger trees in the east (P. Manion pers. comm. 2001).

Environmental Description:  Stands contain plantations of Pinus strobus that are maintained for the extraction of forest products. The type does well on a variety of soils. Some have been planted on strip-mine reclamation sites.

Geographic Range: This white pine plantation is found throughout the northeastern and midwestern United States and adjacent Canada.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  No Data Available



Confidence Level: None

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNA

Greasons: No Data Available

Type Name Database Code Classification Code
Cultural Class CCL01 Anthromorphic Vegetation Cultural Class CCL01 7
Cultural Formation CFO02 Forest Plantation & Agroforestry Cultural Formation CFO02 7.A.2
Cultural Group CGR007 Temperate & Boreal Plantation Cultural Group CGR007 7.A.2.1.2
Cultural Subclass CSC01 Woody Agricultural Vegetation Cultural Subclass CSC01 7.A
Cultural Subformation CSF05 Forest Plantation Cultural Subformation CSF05 7.A.2.1
Cultural Subgroup CSG005 Eastern North American Temperate Forest Plantation Cultural Subgroup CSG005 7.A.2.1.2.a
Cultural Subtype CST007178 Eastern White Pine Forest Plantation CST007178 7.A.2.1.2.a.1
Cultural Type CTY009 Native Northern Pine Plantation Cultural Type CTY009 7.A.2.1.2.a.1

Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Pinus strobus Planted Forest (Fleming and Coulling 2001)
< IF3b. Plantation (Hardwood or Conifer) (Allard 1990)
= Pine Plantation (Vanderhorst 2001b)
? Unclassified Clearcut Regeneration (Fleming and Moorhead 2000) [pro parte]
= White Pine Plantation (Edinger et al. 2014b)

Concept Author(s): A.S. Weakley

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen and S.C. Gawler

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 10-26-18

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Coxe, R. 2009. Guide to Delaware vegetation communities. Spring 2009 edition. State of Delaware, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Smyrna.
  • Edinger, G. J., A. L. Feldmann, T. G. Howard, J. J. Schmid, F. C. Sechler, E. Eastman, E. Largay, L. A. Sneddon, C. Lea, and J. Von Loh. 2014b. Vegetation inventory: Saratoga National Historical Park, New York. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NETN/NRTR--2014/869, National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Fleming, G. P., and P. P. Coulling. 2001. Ecological communities of the George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Preliminary classification and description of vegetation types. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. 317 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., and W. H. Moorhead, III. 2000. Plant communities and ecological land units of the Peter''s Mountain area, James River Ranger District, George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 00-07. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. Unpublished report submitted to the USDA Forest Service. 195 pp. plus appendices.
  • Hop, K., S. Lubinski, J. Dieck, J. Drake, and S. Menard. 2009. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana. USDI U.S. Geological Survey, La Crosse, WI, and NatureServe, St. Paul, MN. 312 pp.
  • NRCS [Natural Resources Conservation Service]. 2004a. Soil survey of Saratoga County, New York. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 590 pp.
  • NatureServe. 2009. Vegetation of the E.B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge. International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Classifications. NatureServe Central Databases. Arlington, VA. U.S.A. Data current as of 1 December 2009.
  • Patterson, K. D. 2008b. Vegetation classification and mapping at Booker T. Washington National Monument, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/100. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 173 pp.
  • Podniesinski, G. S., L. A. Sneddon, J. Lundgren, H. Devine, B. Slocumb, and F. Koch. 2005b. Vegetation classification and mapping of Valley Forge National Historical Park. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2005/028. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 129 pp.
  • Reschke, C. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Latham, NY. 96 pp.
  • Sechler, F. C., G. J. Edinger, T. G. Howard, J. J. Schmid, E. Eastman, E. Largay, L. A. Sneddon, C. Lea, and J. Von Loh. 2014. Vegetation classification and mapping at Roosevelt-Vanderbilt National Historic Sites, New York. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NETN/NRTR--2014/873, National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 392 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • Vanderhorst, J. 2001a. Plant community classification and mapping of the Camp Dawson Collective Training Area, Preston County, West Virginia. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Elkins. 101 pp.
  • Vanderhorst, J. 2001b. Plant communities of the New River Gorge National River, West Virginia: Northern and southern thirds. Non-game Wildlife and Natural Heritage Program, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. Elkins. 146 pp.
  • Vanderhorst, J. P., J. Jeuck, and S. C. Gawler. 2007. Vegetation classification and mapping of New River Gorge National River, West Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR-2007/092. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 396 pp.
  • Vanderhorst, J., and B. P. Streets. 2006. Vegetation classification and mapping of Camp Dawson Army Training Site, West Virginia: Second approximation. Natural Heritage Program, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Elkins. 83 pp.