Print Report

CEGL002492 Quercus velutina - Quercus ellipsoidalis - (Quercus alba) / Schizachyrium scoparium - Lupinus perennis Wooded Grassland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Black Oak - Northern Pin Oak - (White Oak) / Little Bluestem - Sundial Lupine Open Woodland

Colloquial Name: Black Oak / Lupine Barrens

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This black oak - mixed oak barrens community occurs in the central and lower Great Lakes region of the United States and adjacent Canada. Stands occur on sandy outwash or lakeplains. Soils are well-drained, coarse-textured, varying from almost pure sand to sandy loam. Canopy structure varies from a dominant herbaceous ground layer with sparse, scattered ''savanna'' canopy (5-30%), through oak-dominated scrub, to a more closed ''woodland'' canopy (30-80%). The canopy layer is dominated by Quercus velutina, with some Quercus ellipsoidalis and Quercus alba, the latter more common eastward and in woodland conditions. Occasional Pinus banksiana can occur in the northern parts of the range. Tree height varies from 5-15 m. A subcanopy layer may be composed of the preceding species or Prunus serotina, Sassafras albidum, and Carya ovata. Tall shrubs may include Cornus amomum, Cornus foemina, Corylus americana, and Rhus glabra. The low-shrub/scrub layer typically contains Ceanothus americanus, Rosa spp. (such as Rosa carolina), and Rubus allegheniensis, but may contain ericaceous shrubs, such as Gaylussacia baccata, Vaccinium angustifolium and Vaccinium pallidum. The herb layer is dominated by graminoids, such as Andropogon gerardii, Carex pensylvanica, and Schizachyrium scoparium. Typical forbs include Antennaria neglecta, Antennaria plantaginifolia, Euphorbia corollata, Helianthemum bicknellii, Helianthemum canadense, Lespedeza capitata, Lithospermum caroliniense, Lithospermum canescens, Lupinus perennis, and Pteridium aquilinum. Forb dominance may increase as woody cover increases.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: A black oak woodland variant or phase may occur, but because Quercus velutina can sprout after stems have been killed by fires, stands generally have a somewhat scrubby structure that can vary from 10-60% cover over time. Indiana reports a mesic sand savanna stand. Does it belong here? Oak-pine barrens of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota are not included in this type.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Canopy structure varies from a dominant herbaceous ground layer with sparse, scattered ''savanna'' canopy (5-30%), through oak-dominated scrub, to a more closed ''woodland'' canopy (30-80%). The canopy layer is dominated by Quercus velutina, with some Quercus ellipsoidalis and Quercus alba, the latter more common eastward and in woodland conditions. Occasional Pinus banksiana can occur in the northern parts of the range. Tree height varies from 5-15 m. A subcanopy layer may be composed of the preceding species or Prunus serotina, Sassafras albidum, and Carya ovata. Tall shrubs may include Cornus amomum, Cornus foemina, Corylus americana, and Rhus glabra. The low-shrub/scrub layer typically contains Ceanothus americanus, Rosa spp. (such as Rosa carolina), and Rubus allegheniensis, but may contain ericaceous shrubs, such as Gaylussacia baccata, Vaccinium angustifolium and Vaccinium pallidum. The herb layer is dominated by graminoids, such as Andropogon gerardii, Carex pensylvanica, and Schizachyrium scoparium. Typical forbs include Antennaria neglecta, Antennaria plantaginifolia, Euphorbia corollata, Helianthemum bicknellii, Helianthemum canadense, Lespedeza capitata, Lithospermum caroliniense (Minnesota), Lithospermum canescens (Wisconsin), Lupinus perennis, and Pteridium aquilinum. Forb dominance may increase as woody cover increases (Curtis 1959, MNNHP 1993, Anderson 1996). Composition and structure vary in this type depending on geography, site characteristics, and disturbance history.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This community generally occurs on well-drained, coarse-textured, sandy, infertile soils derived from glacial outwash, high gravelly/sandy moraines, or lakeplain dune systems. Soils vary from almost pure sand to sandy loam.

Geographic Range: This black oak - mixed oak barrens community occurs in the central and lower Great Lakes region of the United States and adjacent Canada, extending from Ohio and Ontario west to Iowa and Minnesota.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  IA, IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, ON, PA?, WI




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: merged

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Quercus velutina - (Quercus alba) - Quercus ellipsoidalis / Schizachyrium scoparium - Lupinus perennis Wooded Herbaceous Vegetation (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Oak Barrens]
= Dry Oak Savanna (Southeast Section) Barrens Subtype (MNNHP 1993)
= Oak Barrens (Anderson 1996) [Uncertain if equivalent; Anderson appears to include black oak forests, ~Quercus velutina / Carex pensylvanica Forest (CEGL002078)$$, and sand barrens, ~Schizachyrium scoparium - Carex muehlenbergii - Lithospermum caroliniense - Opuntia humifusa Sand Grassland (CEGL005099)$$, in this type.]

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 07-10-98

  • Anderson, D. M. 1996. The vegetation of Ohio: Two centuries of change. Draft. Ohio Biological Survey.
  • Curtis, J. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin: An ordination of plant communities. Reprinted in 1987. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 657 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Hop, K., S. Lubinski, J. Dieck, J. Drake, and S. Menard. 2009. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana. USDI U.S. Geological Survey, La Crosse, WI, and NatureServe, St. Paul, MN. 312 pp.
  • INAI [Iowa Natural Areas Inventory]. 2017. Vegetation classification of Iowa. Iowa Natural Areas Inventory, Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Des Moines.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • MNNHP [Minnesota Natural Heritage Program]. 1993. Minnesota''s native vegetation: A key to natural communities. Version 1.5. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program, St. Paul, MN. 110 pp.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003-2005a. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota. Three volumes: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province (2003), The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (2005c), The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces (2005b). Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2005b. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota: The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • ONHD [Ohio Natural Heritage Database]. No date. Vegetation classification of Ohio and unpublished data. Ohio Natural Heritage Database, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.