Print Report

CST007108 Pinus taeda / Rhus copallinum Forest Plantation

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Loblolly Pine / Winged Sumac Forest Plantation

Colloquial Name: West Gulf Coastal Plain Managed Loblolly Pine Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Cultural Subtype

Type Concept: This mature or late-successional Pinus taeda forest occurs west of the Mississippi River in the West Gulf and Upper West Gulf coastal plains. It was initially described from Pinus taeda seed tree/shelterwood regeneration areas, but may also result from a number of other forestry management practices and/or historical land uses. Many existing examples on the national forests in Texas are derived, in part, from Red-cockaded Woodpecker management programs. These are mature stands with large diameter (usually "sawtimber" sized) pine stems which have been heavily thinned, removing all other overstory trees and leaving a Pinus taeda canopy of variable density, but which appears to have a quite open canopy. Early-successional, younger, and denser managed Pinus taeda stands are covered by other associations. In most of the region in which this type occurs, natural upland Pinus taeda stands are quite rare, and most examples of this type are believed to occur on sites formerly occupied by either Pinus echinata, Pinus palustris, or mixed pine-oak stands. In any given stand, the canopy closure varies temporally as different management techniques are applied, especially thinning, seed tree cuts, and seed tree removals. The understory composition of these stands is especially variable, depending largely upon stand level management objectives. For example, seed tree stands which were cut specifically to regenerate Pinus taeda are managed very infrequently with prescribed fire thus allowing the development of dense shrub thicket understories. Certain other stands, such as within Picoides borealis habitat management areas, are more actively burned to control understory vegetation. Given the relative intolerance of young and regenerating Pinus taeda to fire, pine regeneration may be either plentiful or absent in these stands, just as shrubs are scattered to dense, with composition and density dependent on management (as well as moisture conditions). Herbs are few to absent, in part due to lack of prescribed fire, but also due to a tendency for heavy canopy closure preceding harvesting operations, and occasionally due to previous site preparation practices.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This association should be expanded to cover other geographic areas where ruderal Pinus taeda forests occur.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: No Data Available

Dynamics:  This is a silviculturally disturbed community. Forest management practices directly determine the successional trajectory of these stands. Given frequent fire management, this type may develop an herbaceous-dominated understory. If burned or thinned more frequently, this forest may revert to a woodland physiognomy. This community will likely be cut before any other successional phases occur.

Environmental Description:  This forest is a West Gulf Coastal Plain Pinus taeda plantation or a seed tree/shelterwood-regenerated site, typically on mesic to dry upland sites. This is a variable community which is silviculturally managed and site prepped, occurring on a wide range of upland habitats and soils. This type is not restricted to any particular soil type, and may occur across nearly any upland soil with the possible exception of calcareous clays. Previously observed on Betis, Briley, Ruston and Smithdale soil series.

Geographic Range: This modified or managed association is found in eastern Texas, western Louisiana, southern Arkansas, and southeastern Oklahoma.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  No Data Available



Confidence Level: None

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNA

Greasons: No Data Available

Type Name Database Code Classification Code
Cultural Class CCL01 Anthromorphic Vegetation Cultural Class CCL01 7
Cultural Formation CFO02 Forest Plantation & Agroforestry Cultural Formation CFO02 7.A.2
Cultural Group CGR007 Temperate & Boreal Plantation Cultural Group CGR007 7.A.2.1.2
Cultural Subclass CSC01 Woody Agricultural Vegetation Cultural Subclass CSC01 7.A
Cultural Subformation CSF05 Forest Plantation Cultural Subformation CSF05 7.A.2.1
Cultural Subgroup CSG005 Eastern North American Temperate Forest Plantation Cultural Subgroup CSG005 7.A.2.1.2.a
Cultural Subtype CST007108 Loblolly Pine / Winged Sumac Forest Plantation CST007108 7.A.2.1.2.a.4
Cultural Type CTY012 Native Southern Pine Plantation Cultural Type CTY012 7.A.2.1.2.a.4

Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < IF3b. Plantation (Hardwood or Conifer) (Allard 1990)
< Loblolly Pine: 81 (Eyre 1980)
? T1A9bII2a. Pinus taeda (Foti et al. 1994)

Concept Author(s): J.E. Mohan

Author of Description: J.E. Mohan and R.E. Evans

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 05-15-02

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Diamond, D. D. 1993. Classification of the plant communities of Texas (series level). Unpublished document. Texas Natural Heritage Program, Austin. 25 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Foti, T., M. Blaney, X. Li, and K. G. Smith. 1994. A classification system for the natural vegetation of Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science 48:50-53.
  • Hatchell, G. E. 1964. Small mammal species and populations in the loblolly-shortleaf pine forest type of Louisiana. Research Paper SO-10. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA. 12 pp.
  • Hoagland, B. 2000. The vegetation of Oklahoma: A classification for landscape mapping and conservation planning. The Southwestern Naturalist 45(4):385-420.
  • Martin, W. H., S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht, editors. 1993a. Biodiversity of the southeastern United States: Lowland terrestrial communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 502 pp.
  • NatureServe Ecology - Southeastern United States. No date. Unpublished data. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.