Print Report

CEGL007215 Quercus rubra - Quercus muehlenbergii / Hamamelis virginiana / Polymnia canadensis Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Northern Red Oak - Chinquapin Oak / American Witch-hazel / White-flower Leafcup Forest

Colloquial Name: Appalachian Calcareous Oak - Walnut Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This association represents forests on sheltered dolomite slopes in the Southern Blue Ridge with canopies dominated by Quercus spp., Juglans nigra, and Magnolia acuminata. However, a small amount of the canopy and understory is always composed of calciphilic canopy species more characteristic of areas west of the Blue Ridge, including Quercus muehlenbergii and Juglans cinerea. The dominant shrub is Hamamelis virginiana, but other shrubs include Calycanthus floridus, Cornus alternifolia, and Hydrangea arborescens. The herbaceous layer is lush and diverse, with typical species including Impatiens spp., Hybanthus concolor, Polymnia canadensis, Laportea canadensis, Aquilegia canadensis, Adiantum pedatum, Sanguinaria canadensis, and Asarum canadense.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: The name of the association is based on a North Carolina occurrence over limestone on North Fork Catawba River (McDowell County). The name and concept may need modification with additional information. It is documented by plots gathered by the North Carolina Vegetation Survey near Linville Caverns, North Carolina (Plots 4-303 and 5-304 from PULSE 1995). Related vegetation in Virginia is treated as ~Quercus muehlenbergii - Quercus (alba, rubra) - Carya cordiformis / Viburnum prunifolium Forest (CEGL004793)$$, a broad and variable dry-mesic calcareous forest.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Canopies of this community are dominated by Quercus spp., Juglans nigra, and Magnolia acuminata. However, a small amount of the canopy and understory is always composed of calciphilic canopy species more characteristic of areas west of the Blue Ridge, including Quercus muehlenbergii and Juglans cinerea. The dominant shrub is Hamamelis virginiana, but other shrubs include Calycanthus floridus, Cornus alternifolia, and Hydrangea arborescens. The herbaceous layer is lush and diverse, with typical species including Impatiens spp., Hybanthus concolor, Polymnia canadensis, Laportea canadensis, Aquilegia canadensis, Adiantum pedatum, Sanguinaria canadensis, and Asarum canadense. Due to the isolated nature of this type of geology in this part of the Appalachians, the species composition tends to be very different than the surrounding matrix. It is not clear at this point whether this community is indeed its own type or whether there is enough similarity to other types in the Ridge and Valley to warrant lumping it with them.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This association represents forests on sheltered dolomite slopes in the Southern Blue Ridge. This type of geology is extremely uncommon this far east in the southern Appalachians, so this community is isolated from other patches of similar geology.

Geographic Range: This community is currently only known to occur in North Carolina.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  NC, SC?




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G1Q

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? IA5e. Calcareous Mesophytic Forest (Allard 1990)

Concept Author(s): A.S. Weakley

Author of Description: R. White

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 10-24-02

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Fleming, Gary P. Personal communication. Ecologist, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Peet, R. K., T. R. Wentworth, M. P. Schafale, and A.S. Weakley. No date. Unpublished data of the North Carolina Vegetation Survey. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.