Print Report

CEGL006565 Betula lenta - Quercus montana / Parthenocissus quinquefolia Woodland

Type Concept Sentence: This sweet birch - chestnut oak talus woodland occurs on steep talus slopes composed of quartzite, sandstone, or phyllite, in the Central Appalachians; examples are typically dominated by the tree Betula lenta, with Betula papyrifera, Betula populifolia, or Betula alleghaniensis, as well as Quercus montana and Nyssa sylvatica.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Sweet Birch - Chestnut Oak / Virginia Creeper Woodland

Colloquial Name: Sweet Birch - Chestnut Oak Talus Woodland

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This talus or rocky slope woodland community occurs in the central Appalachian Mountains and extends west to the Western Allegheny Plateau in Pennsylvania. The substrate is generally quartzite or sandstone talus. Sites are usually steeply sloping, but the type also sometimes occurs on gentler benches and ridge crests. Soils, where present, are shallow, organic, acidic and infertile. The canopy is of variable cover but generally open with gnarled, widely spaced trees. Characteristic trees are birches, primarily Betula lenta but less frequently including Betula papyrifera, Betula populifolia, or Betula alleghaniensis, as well as Nyssa sylvatica. Other tree associates may include Tsuga canadensis, Acer rubrum, Carya glabra, Quercus montana, Quercus alba, Quercus rubra, Quercus velutina, or Quercus coccinea. Typical shrubs include Acer spicatum, Acer pensylvanicum, Amelanchier arborea, Castanea dentata, Kalmia latifolia, Hamamelis virginiana, Menziesia pilosa, Ribes rotundifolium, Vaccinium angustifolium, Vitis spp., Toxicodendron radicans, Smilax rotundifolia, and Parthenocissus quinquefolia. Ferns characterize the herb layer and may include Dryopteris marginalis, Polypodium virginianum, Woodsia obtusa, or Asplenium platyneuron. The forbs Aralia nudicaulis, Heuchera spp., and Scutellaria saxatilis are also well-adapted to the bouldery habitats. Lichens, especially the rock-tripes Lasallia papulosa and Umbilicaria mammulata and the foliose species Flavoparmelia baltimorensis, characterize the nonvascular layer.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This vegetation type is broadly defined and exhibits considerable geographic and elevational variation. It is also poorly represented by plot data, and additional sampling is needed, particularly of lower elevation and south-slope stands. Even with limited data, potential variants of the type in Virginia were proposed by Fleming and Moorhead (2000). A variant of sheltered north slopes in which Tsuga canadensis is codominant with Betula lenta and/or Quercus spp. has been reported from Virginia by Hupp (1983) and from Pennsylvania by Fike (1999), but may be referable to bouldery variants of ~Tsuga canadensis - Quercus montana - Betula lenta Forest (CEGL006923)$$. Many Virginia populations of the state-rare, northern tree Betula papyrifera var. cordifolia are associated with this community type.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Physiognomy varies from nearly closed forest to open woodland with widely spaced trees. The canopy is dominated by more-or-less gnarled specimens of Betula lenta and Quercus montana (= Quercus prinus) generally <20 m tall. Betula lenta is usually the sole dominant of less weathered, steeper, more unstable boulderfield habitats, while a greater variety of trees is often codominant with Betula lenta on more weathered and stable habitats. Other overstory associates that may be important on some sites are Quercus rubra, Nyssa sylvatica, Betula populifolia, Betula papyrifera var. cordifolia, Carya glabra, Tsuga canadensis, and Betula alleghaniensis. The presence of well-preserved, fallen boles indicates that Castanea dentata was important on some boulderfields prior to the arrival of chestnut blight (Fleming and Moorhead 2000). Acer rubrum and Nyssa sylvatica are scattered canopy associates and frequent understory species. The typically open shrub layer contains Acer pensylvanicum, Acer spicatum, Amelanchier arborea, Castanea dentata sprouts, Hamamelis virginiana, Ilex montana, Kalmia latifolia, Menziesia pilosa (at the southern end of the range), and Ribes rotundifolium. The ground layer consists almost entirely of low-statured shrubs, particularly Menziesia pilosa and Vaccinium angustifolium, and/or scattered to abundant vines of Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Vitis spp., Toxicodendron radicans, and Smilax rotundifolia. True herbs are very sparse and restricted to mossy pockets or flat boulders; typical species are Dryopteris marginalis, Polypodium appalachianum, Deschampsia flexuosa, and Danthonia spicata. In the southern portion of the range, Heuchera spp. and Scutellaria saxatilis are characteristic herbs. Bryophyte cover ranges up to 65% in some microhabitats. The rock-tripes Lasallia papulosa and Umbilicaria mammulata, and the foliose species Flavoparmelia baltimorensis, are generally the most conspicuous lichens. The combination of surficial boulder cover and nutrient-poor substrate results in a notably low mean species richness (n = 24 taxa per 400 m2) in Virginia and Maryland plot samples of this type.

Dynamics:  This boulderfield woodland represents a long-term sere in the geomorphic and vegetational progression from exposed, lichen-dominated block fields to fully forested mountain slopes with well-developed mineral soils. In addition to edaphic stresses, trees of these habitats are subject to frequent damage from wind and ice storms. This community often occurs in patch-mosaics with open, lichen-covered boulderfields that lack vascular plants. Boundaries between the boulderfield woodlands and adjacent forests are often obscure, with composition gradually changing along with substrate conditions and soil depth. This type frequently intergrades with several communities of the Mixed Oak / Heath Forests group, especially ~Quercus montana - Quercus rubra / Hamamelis virginiana Forest (CEGL006057)$$ of somewhat sheltered, often very rocky slopes. In Virginia, this association reaches optimal development on sideslopes of linear sandstone and quartzite strike ridges in the Ridge and Valley, and on the western, metasedimentary flank of the northern Blue Ridge. Landsliding and debris avalanches, which generate and regenerate boulderfield environments, are dominant erosional processes in these landscapes (Hack and Goodlett 1960).

Environmental Description:  Sites include the edges of very large, unvegetated (except for lichens), scarcely weathered block fields, as well as a variety of more weathered boulderfields and slopes covered by coarse to fine, bouldery colluvium. Much of the bouldery rubble is weathered from resistant quartzite, sandstone caprock, or phyllite. The elevation range of plot-sampled stands in Virginia is 100 to 1025 m (300-3360 feet). Slope position and aspect are variable, while associated landforms include landslide scarps, slide masses, concave hollow heads, and incised hollow bottoms. Mean cover of exposed boulders at Virginia sampling sites is 72%. In this very rocky environment, soil is limited to local, interstitial, root-rich duff deposits, or to "pads" of moss and underlying, thin, organic / sandy material that have developed on wide, flat boulder surfaces. Interstitial air spaces between boulders may be prevalent for 1.0 m or more below the surface. Soils are largely organic and usually extremely acidic and infertile. There is often some heterogeneity of boulder depth and weathering, as well as of microclimate and soil moisture, within boulderfields. In general, sites are somewhat xeric and show little evidence of subsurface drainage. However, this regime is ameliorated by higher elevations and north aspects, which probably slow evaporation and increase the moisture-holding capacity of the bouldery substrate.

Geographic Range: This community occurs locally throughout the Blue Ridge and Ridge and Valley sections of Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland, extending northeast to the Pennsylvania-New Jersey border and New York.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  MD, NJ, NY, PA, VA, WV




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Betula lenta - Quercus montana - Quercus rubra / Menziesia pilosa / Dryopteris marginalis Forest (Young et al. 2007a)
= Betula lenta - Quercus prinus / Parthenocissus quinquefolia Woodland (Lea 2003)
= Betula lenta - Quercus prinus / Parthenocissus quinquefolia Woodland (Fleming and Taverna 2006)
= Betula lenta - Quercus prinus / Parthenocissus quinquefolia Woodland (Fleming and Patterson 2009a)
> Betula lenta / Parthenocissus quinquefolia Association (Rawinski et al. 1996)
> Betula lenta / Ribes rotundifolium - Menziesia pilosa / Parthenocissus quinquefolia - Polypodium appalachianum Woodland (Fleming and Coulling 2001)
> Quercus rubra - Quercus montana - Betula lenta / Ilex montana / Menziesia pilosa Forest (Fleming and Moorhead 2000)
> Quercus rubra - Quercus montana - Betula lenta / Parthenocissus quinquefolia Forest (Fleming and Moorhead 2000)
> Talus Slope Community (Walz 1996)

Concept Author(s): Anderson et al. (1998)

Author of Description: G. Fleming, P. Coulling, S.C. Gawler

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 10-04-06

  • Anderson, M., F. Biasi, and S. Buttrick. 1998. Conservation site selection: Ecoregional planning for biodiversity. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Regional Office, Boston, MA. 18 pp.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., A. Belden, Jr., K. E. Heffernan, A. C. Chazal, N. E. Van Alstine, and E. M. Butler. 2007a. A natural heritage inventory of the rock outcrops of Shenandoah National Park. Unpublished report submitted to the National Park Service. Natural Heritage Technical Report 07-01. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 433 pp. plus appendixes.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2009a. A vegetation classification for the Appalachian Trail: Virginia south to Georgia. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. In-house analysis, March 2009.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2009b. Classification of selected Virginia montane wetland groups. In-house analysis, December 2009. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. Taverna. 2006. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, western region. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2006. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and P. P. Coulling. 2001. Ecological communities of the George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Preliminary classification and description of vegetation types. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. 317 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., and W. H. Moorhead, III. 2000. Plant communities and ecological land units of the Peter''s Mountain area, James River Ranger District, George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 00-07. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. Unpublished report submitted to the USDA Forest Service. 195 pp. plus appendices.
  • Hack, J. T., and J. C. Goodlett. 1960. Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain region in the Central Appalachians. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 347. 66 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W. 2011. The natural communities of Maryland: 2011 working list of ecological community groups and community types. Unpublished report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis. 33 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
  • Hupp, C. R. 1983. Vegetation pattern on channel features in the Passage Creek Gorge, Virginia. Castanea 48:62-72.
  • Lea, C. 2003. Vegetation types in the National Capital Region Parks. Draft for review by NatureServe, Virginia Natural Heritage, West Virginia Natural Heritage, Maryland Natural Heritage, and National Park Service. March 2003. 140 pp.
  • Lea, C. 2004. Draft vegetation types in National Capital Region Parks. Edited by S.C. Gawler and J. Teague. Working draft for review by NatureServe, Virginia Natural Heritage, West Virginia Natural Heritage, Maryland Natural Heritage, and National Park Service. July 2004. 157 pp.
  • Perles, S. J., G. S. Podniesinski, E. Eastman, L. A. Sneddon, and S. C. Gawler. 2007. Classification and mapping of vegetation and fire fuel models at Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2007/076. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 2 volumes.
  • Podniesinski, G. S., L. A. Sneddon, J. Lundgren, H. Devine, B. Slocumb, and F. Koch. 2005b. Vegetation classification and mapping of Valley Forge National Historical Park. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2005/028. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 129 pp.
  • Rawinski, T. J., K. N. Hickman, J. Waller-Eling, G. P. Fleming, C. S. Austin, S. D. Helmick, C. Huber, G. Kappesser, F. C. Huber, Jr., T. Bailey, and T. K. Collins. 1996. Plant communities and ecological land units of the Glenwood Ranger District, George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. Natural Heritage Technical Report 96-20. Richmond. 65 pp. plus appendices.
  • Russell, E. W. B., and A. E. Schuyler. 1988. Vegetation and flora of Hopewell Furnace National Historic Site, eastern Pennsylvania. Bartonia 54:124-143.
  • WVNHP [West Virginia Natural Heritage Program]. No date. Unpublished data. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program, Elkins.
  • Walz, K. S. 1996. Final report: Ecological community inventory of High Mountain Park, Wayne Township, Passaic County, New Jersey. The Nature Conservancy, New Jersey Field Office, Chester. 120 pp.
  • Young, J., G. Fleming, P. Townsend, and J. Foster. 2006. Vegetation of Shenandoah National Park in relation to environmental gradients. Final Report (v.1.1). Research technical report prepared for USDI, National Park Service. USGS/NPS Vegetation Mapping Program. 92 pp. plus appendices.
  • Young, J., G. Fleming, P. Townsend, and J. Foster. 2007a. Vegetation of Shenandoah National Park in relation to environmental gradients. Final Report, volume 1.1. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 103 pp. plus appendices and GIS products.
  • Young, J., G. Fleming, W. Cass, and C. Lea. 2009. Vegetation of Shenandoah National Park in relation to environmental gradients, Version 2.0. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2009/142. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 389 pp.