Print Report

CEGL005152 Potamogeton zosteriformis - Ceratophyllum demersum - Elodea canadensis Southern Great Lakes Shore Aquatic Vegetation

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Flatstem Pondweed - Coon''s-tail - Canadian Waterweed Southern Great Lakes Shore Aquatic Vegetation

Colloquial Name: Southern Great Lakes Submergent Marsh

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This deep emergent marsh community typically occurs in the southern Great Lakes region of the United States and Canada, including southern Lake Michigan, Lake St. Clair, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario, and into the St. Lawrence River, and possibly Lake Champlain. Remaining stands in the area are primarily found in lacustrine estuaries, barrier-beach lagoons, or sand-spit swales. In the Great Lakes, the estuaries are often formed at the mouths of rivers drowned by the post-glacial rise in lake level, whereas in the St. Lawrence these are formed from small streams or rivers that occupy apparent pre-glacial valleys that have been partly filled in by outwash and alluvial deposits to form fairly broad, flat basins. Storms, seiches, and water level cycles create a very dynamic pattern of species composition and structure in the vegetation. Water depth generally exceeds 0.3 m. Dominant submerged aquatics include Ceratophyllum demersum, Chara spp., Elodea canadensis, Heteranthera dubia, Myriophyllum spicatum, Najas flexilis, Potamogeton spp. (including Potamogeton amplifolius, Potamogeton friesii, Potamogeton gramineus, Stuckenia pectinata, Potamogeton zosteriformis), and Vallisneria americana. Floating aquatics include Lemna minor, Lemna trisulca, and Spirodela polyrrhiza. Other rooted aquatics include Nymphaea odorata, Nuphar advena, Nelumbo lutea, Peltandra virginica, and Sagittaria latifolia. The exotic Hydrocharis morsus-ranae is increasingly common in St. Lawrence, Lake Ontario, and Lake Erie marshes.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This type may often be tracked as part of the ~Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands Complex (CECX005702)$$.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Dominant submerged aquatics include Ceratophyllum demersum, Chara spp., Elodea canadensis, Heteranthera dubia, Myriophyllum spicatum, Najas flexilis, Potamogeton spp. (including Potamogeton amplifolius, Potamogeton friesii, Potamogeton gramineus, Stuckenia pectinata (= Potamogeton pectinatus), Potamogeton zosteriformis), and Vallisneria americana. Floating aquatics include Lemna minor, Lemna trisulca, and Spirodela polyrrhiza. Other rooted aquatics include Nymphaea odorata, Nuphar advena (= Nuphar lutea ssp. advena), Nelumbo lutea, Peltandra virginica, and Sagittaria latifolia. The exotic Hydrocharis morsus-ranae is increasingly common in the St. Lawrence, Lake Ontario, and Lake Erie marshes (Minc and Albert 1998).

Dynamics:  Stands appear to be correlated with greater site protection from wave action and storms (Minc 1996). The southern Great Lakes emergent marshes may have an increased level of dominance in Typha spp. because of a reduction in the amplitude of natural water-level fluctuations (Wilcox et al. 1993, in Minc and Albert 1998). It is thought that the natural fluctuations favor more diverse vegetation because they permit a wider range of habitat, exclude species that cannot tolerate water-depth changes, or favor species requiring periodic exposures of fertile substrates.

Environmental Description:  Remaining stands in the area are primarily found in lacustrine estuaries, barrier-beach lagoons, or sand-spit swales. In the Great Lakes, the estuaries are often formed at the mouths of rivers drowned by the post-glacial rise in lake level, whereas in the St. Lawrence these are formed from small streams or rivers that occupy apparent pre-glacial valleys that have been partly filled in by outwash and alluvial deposits to form fairly broad , flat basins. Storms, seiches, and water level cycles create a very dynamic pattern of species composition and structure in the vegetation. Water depth generally exceeds 0.3 m.

Geographic Range: This deep emergent marsh community typically occurs in the southern Great Lakes region of the United States and Canada, including southern Lake Michigan, Lake St. Clair, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario, and into the St. Lawrence River, and possibly Lake Champlain.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  MI, NY, OH, ON, PA, QC, VT, WI




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Potamogeton zosteriformis - Ceratophyllum demersum - Elodea canadensis Southern Great Lakes Shore Herbaceous Vegetation (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Submerged Aquatic Southern Great Lakes Subtype]

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 11-20-98

  • CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Minc, L. D. 1996. Michigan''s Great Lakes coastal wetlands: Definition, variability, and classification. A report in 2 parts submitted to Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, MI.
  • Minc, L. D., and D. A. Albert. 1998. Great Lakes coastal wetlands: Abiotic and floristic characterization. Great Lakes Wetlands 9(3):1-15.
  • ONHD [Ohio Natural Heritage Database]. No date. Vegetation classification of Ohio and unpublished data. Ohio Natural Heritage Database, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]