Print Report

CEGL007097 Pinus pungens - Pinus rigida - (Quercus montana) / Kalmia latifolia - Vaccinium pallidum Woodland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Table Mountain Pine - Pitch Pine - (Chestnut Oak) / Mountain Laurel - Blue Ridge Blueberry Woodland

Colloquial Name: Blue Ridge Table Mountain Pine - Pitch Pine Woodland (Typic Type)

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This association includes mostly evergreen woodlands dominated by Pinus pungens and/or Pinus rigida, occurring over a dense ericaceous shrub stratum, on sharp ridges, mostly above 610 m (2000 feet) elevation in the Southern Blue Ridge. This type is also found in limited areas of the inner Piedmont and Cumberland Mountains. This woodland occurs across a wide elevational range (485-1220 m [1600-4000 feet]), on exposed ridges and upper slopes with southerly and westerly exposures, over thin, excessively drained, nutrient-poor soils, and can be associated with rock outcroppings. Canopy coverage can often approach that of a forest, especially in areas where fire has been excluded and deciduous species have significant coverage. Deciduous species that can be important, particularly in the subcanopy, include Quercus montana, Quercus coccinea, Quercus stellata, Nyssa sylvatica, Acer rubrum, and Oxydendrum arboreum. Pinus virginiana, Pinus echinata, and Pinus strobus can have high coverage and even codominate on some sites. The shrub stratum is dominated by ericaceous species, typically Kalmia latifolia and Eubotrys recurva in the tall-shrub stratum and Vaccinium pallidum as a low shrub. Other shrub species vary with location but include Vaccinium stamineum, Vaccinium simulatum, Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium hirsutum, Vaccinium corymbosum, Rhododendron maximum, Rhododendron minus, Gaylussacia ursina, Gaylussacia baccata, Buckleya distichophylla, Pyrularia pubera, and Fothergilla major. Species commonly found in the sparse herb stratum include Chimaphila maculata, Galax urceolata, Pteridium aquilinum var. latiusculum, Xerophyllum asphodeloides, Chamaelirium luteum, Comptonia peregrina, Leiophyllum buxifolium, Gaultheria procumbens, Iris verna, Dichanthelium spp., and Epigaea repens, although herbaceous species composition will vary within the range of this community. Smilax glauca is a common vine. Without periodic fire, this community will gradually succeed into forests dominated by Acer rubrum or Quercus montana and Quercus coccinea, except on the most extreme sites, where this vegetation is self-perpetuating. It is thought that woodlands dominated by Pinus pungens are associated with more xeric conditions than woodlands dominated by Pinus pungens in combination with other tree species.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Other communities with Pinus pungens occur in central Pennsylvania and in Virginia. These northern types are thought to have a different species composition and geology than the forests described here. Species associated with Pinus pungens in the northern part of its range that do not occur in this community include Quercus ilicifolia, Viburnum acerifolium, and Vaccinium angustifolium. [See ~Pinus (pungens, rigida) - Quercus montana / (Quercus ilicifolia) / Gaylussacia baccata Woodland (CEGL004996)$$.] Examples of this association studied on lands of the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians in Cherokee County, North Carolina, include a substantial amount of Pinus echinata and lack Pinus pungens. These stands occur on low ridges (520-670 m [1700-2200 feet]) and otherwise, floristically, are a good match for this forest type. It is believed that they are transitional to low-elevation stands dominated by Pinus echinata in the Cumberlands and Southern Ridge and Valley. In the Appalachian Trail classification study, 22 plots from Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia were classified as this association with a homoteneity of 68% (Fleming and Patterson 2009a). The most constant species (>64%), in order of descending constancy, are Kalmia latifolia, Acer rubrum, Quercus montana, Quercus coccinea, Pinus rigida, Pinus pungens, Gaylussacia baccata, Gaylussacia ursina, Oxydendrum arboreum, Vaccinium pallidum, Nyssa sylvatica, Galax urceolata, and Gaultheria procumbens. Less constant species with high mean cover values (>5 cover class) in these plots are Pinus pungens, Pinus rigida, Gaylussacia baccata, Gaylussacia ursina, and Vaccinium hirsutum.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: These mostly evergreen woodlands are characteristically dominated by Pinus pungens and/or Pinus rigida, occurring over a dense ericaceous shrub stratum. Deciduous species that can be important, particularly in the subcanopy, include Quercus montana (= Quercus prinus), Quercus coccinea, Quercus stellata (in lower elevation occurrences), Nyssa sylvatica, Acer rubrum, and Oxydendrum arboreum. Pinus virginiana, Pinus echinata, and Pinus strobus can have high coverage and even codominate on some sites. The shrub stratum is dominated by ericaceous species, typically Kalmia latifolia and Eubotrys recurva (= Leucothoe recurva) in the tall-shrub stratum and Vaccinium pallidum as a low shrub. Other shrub species vary with location, but include Vaccinium stamineum, Vaccinium simulatum, Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium hirsutum, Vaccinium corymbosum, Rhododendron maximum, Rhododendron minus, Gaylussacia ursina, Gaylussacia baccata, Buckleya distichophylla, Pyrularia pubera, Castanea dentata, Castanea pumila, and Fothergilla major. Species commonly found in the sparse herb stratum include Chimaphila maculata, Galax urceolata, Pteridium aquilinum var. latiusculum, Xerophyllum asphodeloides, Chamaelirium luteum, Comptonia peregrina, Leiophyllum buxifolium, Gaultheria procumbens, Iris verna, Melampyrum lineare, Dichanthelium spp., and Epigaea repens, although herbaceous species composition will vary within the range of this community. Smilax glauca is a common vine. Species in this community which have the bulk of their worldwide range in the Southern Blue Ridge include Leiophyllum buxifolium, Pieris floribunda, Pinus pungens, and Xerophyllum asphodeloides. Other rare species include Fothergilla major, Robinia hispida var. fertilis, Robinia hispida var. rosea, and Robinia viscosa var. viscosa.

Dynamics:  Fire contributes to the maintenance of this community by destroying the litter layer, opening the canopy, releasing seed from the serotinous cones, and killing competing vegetation. Red squirrels are known to cut branches to remove the Pinus pungens cones. It is thought this "squirrel grazing" may decrease the growth and vigor of trees (Zobel 1969). Canopy removal by icestorms stimulate oak sprouting and release advanced regeneration (Williams and Johnson 1992). Canopy coverage in stands of this association can often approach that of a forest, especially in areas where fire has been excluded and deciduous species have significant coverage. Without periodic fire, this community will gradually succeed into forests dominated by Quercus montana and Quercus coccinea, except on the most extreme sites, where this vegetation is self-perpetuating (Newell and Peet 1994). However, recent regional pine beetle kills throughout large areas of the Southeast have accelerated the rate of succession in most of these stands. This acceleration of succession may lead to conversion of these forests to hardwoods in the long term (M. Jenkins pers. comm.).

Environmental Description:  This association is typically found on sharp ridges mostly above 610 m (2000 feet) elevation in the Southern Blue Ridge. This woodland occurs across a wide elevation range from 488 to 1220 m (1600-4000 feet) in the Southern Appalachians, on exposed ridges and upper slopes with southerly and westerly exposures, over thin, excessively drained, nutrient-poor soils, and can be associated with rock outcroppings. It is thought that woodlands dominated by Pinus pungens are associated with more xeric conditions than woodlands dominated by Pinus pungens in combination with other tree species (Zobel 1969, Barden 1977).

Geographic Range: This community ranges throughout the Southern Blue Ridge and Cumberland Mountains, from southwestern Virginia and southeastern Kentucky, south through western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee, into northeastern Georgia and northwestern South Carolina.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  GA, KY, NC, SC, TN, VA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: This type has been merged into CEGL007097, per advice of Mike Schafale (2001-01-30).

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < IA7b. Xeric Pitch Pine/Table Mountain Pine Ridge Forest (Allard 1990)
< Pine--Oak/Heath (Schafale and Weakley 1990)
< Pitch Pine: 45 (Eyre 1980)
? Table Mountain Pine type (Golden 1974)
? Xeric Pine Forest (McLeod 1988)

Concept Author(s): M.P. Schafale and A.S. Weakley (1990)

Author of Description: M.P. Schafale and A.S. Weakley

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 02-24-10

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Barden, L. S. 1977. Self-maintaining populations of Pinus pungens Lam. in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Castanea 42:316-323.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2009a. A vegetation classification for the Appalachian Trail: Virginia south to Georgia. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. In-house analysis, March 2009.
  • GNHP [Georgia Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data. Georgia Natural Heritage Program, Wildlife Resources Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Social Circle.
  • Golden, M. S. 1974. Forest vegetation and site relationships in the central portion of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 275 pp.
  • Golden, M. S. 1981. An integrated multivariate analysis of forest communities of the central Great Smoky Mountains. The American Midland Naturalist 106:37-53.
  • Hedlin, A. F., H. O. Yates, III, D. C. Tover, B. H. Ebel, T. W. Koerber, and E. P. Merkel. 1981. Cone and seed insects of North American conifers. Cooperative Publication. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
  • McLeod, D. E. 1988. Vegetation patterns, floristics, and environmental relationships in the Black and Craggy mountains of North Carolina. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 222 pp.
  • NatureServe Ecology - Southeastern United States. No date. Unpublished data. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Newell, C. L., and R. K. Peet. 1995. Vegetation of Linville Gorge Wilderness, North Carolina. Unpublished report. to USDA Forest Service. University of North Carolina, Department of Biology, Chapel Hill. 211 pp.
  • Peet, R. K., T. R. Wentworth, M. P. Schafale, and A.S. Weakley. No date. Unpublished data of the North Carolina Vegetation Survey. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Racine, C. H. 1966. Pine communities and their site characteristics in the Blue Ridge escarpment. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 82:172-181.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • TDNH [Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage]. 2018. Unpublished data. Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage, Nashville, TN.
  • Turrill, N. L., and E. R. Buckner. 1995. The loss of Southern Appalachian Pinus pungens Lam. due to fire suppression. ASB Bulletin 42:109.
  • Wharton, C. H. 1978. The natural environments of Georgia. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta. 227 pp.
  • White, Jr., R. D. 2003. Vascular plant inventory and plant community classification for Carl Sandburg Home National Historic Site. NatureServe, Durham, NC. 160 pp.
  • White, R. D., Jr. 2006. Vascular plant inventory and ecological community classification for Cumberland Gap National Historical Park. NatureServe, Durham, NC. 246 pp.
  • Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26:1-80.
  • Williams, C. E. 1991. Maintenance of the disturbance-dependent Appalachian endemic, Pinus pungens, under low disturbance regimes. Natural Areas Journal 11:169-170.
  • Williams, C. E., M. V. Lipscomb, W. C. Johnson, and E. T. Nilsen. 1990a. Influence of leaf litter and soil moisture on early establishment of Pinus pungens. The American Midland Naturalist 124:142-152.
  • Williams, C. E., and W. C. Johnson. 1990. Age structure and the maintenance of Pinus pungens in pine-oak forests of southwestern Virginia. The American Midland Naturalist 124:130-141.
  • Williams, C. E., and W. C. Johnson. 1992. Factors affecting recruitment of Pinus pungens in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22:878-887.
  • Zobel, D. B. 1969. Factors affecting the distribution of Pinus pungens, an Appalachian endemic. Ecological Monographs 39:303-333.