Print Report

CEGL006266 Pinus virginiana / Quercus marilandica Serpentine Ruderal Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Virginia Pine / Blackjack Oak Serpentine Ruderal Forest

Colloquial Name: Virginia Pine Serpentine Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This community represents successional Virginia pine forests of serpentine barrens of the northern Piedmont. This forest or woodland occurs on soils underlain and influenced by serpentine bedrock. It is dominated by Pinus virginiana with a subcanopy of Quercus marilandica. Other tree associates include Quercus stellata, Sassafras albidum, Prunus serotina, Nyssa sylvatica, Juniperus virginiana, and Robinia pseudoacacia. A dense shrub layer dominated by Smilax rotundifolia and/or Smilax glauca is characteristic in canopy openings. Other shrubs may include Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium stamineum, Gaylussacia baccata, Quercus ilicifolia, and Quercus prinoides. Herbs may include Aralia nudicaulis, Pteridium aquilinum, Microstegium vimineum, Dichanthelium dichotomum, and Danthonia spicata. In some woodlands with less canopy cover and stonier soils, Schizachyrium scoparium and Sporobolus heterolepis dominate patches of the herbaceous layer along with scattered individuals of Symphyotrichum depauperatum, Scleria pauciflora, Cerastium arvense var. villosum, Solidago nemoralis, Packera anonyma, Dichanthelium sphaerocarpon, and Arabis lyrata.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This serpentine woodland/forest is dominated by Pinus virginiana with a subcanopy of Quercus marilandica. Other tree associates include Quercus stellata, Sassafras albidum, Prunus serotina, Nyssa sylvatica, Juniperus virginiana, and Robinia pseudoacacia. A dense shrub layer dominated by Smilax rotundifolia and/or Smilax glauca is characteristic in canopy openings. Other shrubs may include Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium stamineum, Gaylussacia baccata, Quercus ilicifolia, and Quercus prinoides. Herbs may include Aralia nudicaulis, Pteridium aquilinum, Microstegium vimineum, Dichanthelium dichotomum (= Panicum dichotomum), and Danthonia spicata. In some woodlands with less canopy cover and stonier soils, Schizachyrium scoparium and Sporobolus heterolepis dominate patches of the herbaceous layer along with scattered individuals of Symphyotrichum depauperatum (= Aster depauperatus), Scleria pauciflora, Cerastium arvense var. villosum, Solidago nemoralis, Packera anonyma (= Senecio anonymus), Dichanthelium sphaerocarpon (= Panicum sphaerocarpon), and Arabis lyrata.

Dynamics:  This plant community is adapted to the weathering of serpentine bedrock. It was once thought that the lack of canopy cover was maintained by the unique edaphic features of the chrome series soils, but in the last 20 years, many sites have been invaded by dense Pinus virginiana (Tyndall 1992a). In serpentine barrens in Pennsylvania, Virginia pine and black jack oak are the canopy dominants of this type. This phenomenon dramatically alters the light regime and promotes substantial soil development (up to 10 cm in 20 years). Under these conditions, an entirely different community develops as the influence of the bedrock is buffered by the soil/litter accumulation. This closed-canopy serpentine forest is dominated by red maple and various oaks and typically exhibits a dense understory of Smilax rotundifolia. Some of the characteristic herbaceous serpentine species apparently persist in the ground layer as scattered non-flowering individuals; other populations appear to die out but may persist in the seed bank. Selective cutting has been effective in restoring degraded sites to their previous composition and structure, but most researchers believe that without regular burning to prevent soil development the serpentine plant communities will not persist. There is substantial evidence that most of the existing areas were regularly burned by Native Americans (Marye 1920, 1955a, 1955b, 1955c) and perhaps maintained by grazing after European settlement.

Environmental Description:  This community type is a successional forest occurring on soils underlain and influenced by serpentine bedrock. It occurs on upper slopes and ridgetops with variable slopes (0-10°) with a west, northwest or north aspect. Soils are somewhat moist to dry silt loams or clay loams.

Geographic Range: This type is currently described from Cecil County in Maryland and Lancaster and Chester counties in Pennsylvania.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  MD, PA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNA

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: CEGL006159 was split into several distinct serpentine barrens types.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? Pine-Oak-Catbrier Forest/Conifer Woodland (Podniesinski et al. 1999)
< Serpentine Barrens (Tyndall 1992a)

Concept Author(s): Central Appalachian Planning Team

Author of Description: S.L. Neid, M. Anderson, G. Podniesinski, A. Leimanis, J. Ebert

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 09-21-05

  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.
  • Marye, W. B. 1920. The old Indian road. Maryland Historical Magazine 15:107-124, 208-229, 345-395.
  • Marye, W. B. 1955a. The great Maryland barrens I. Maryland Historical Magazine 50:11-23.
  • Marye, W. B. 1955b. The great Maryland barrens II. Maryland Historical Magazine 50:124-142.
  • Marye, W. B. 1955c. The great Maryland barrens III. Maryland Historical Magazine 50:234-253.
  • Podniesinski, G., A. Leimanis, and J. Ebert. 1999. Serpentine plant community classification. Unpublished data. Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, Pittsburgh, PA. 14 pp.
  • Tyndall, R. W. 1989. Aerial photo analysis of woody plant succession in eight Delmarva bays. Unpublished report for The Nature Conservancy. MD. 10 pp.
  • Tyndall, R. W. 1992a. Historical considerations of conifer expansion in Maryland serpentine "barrens." Castanea 57:123-131.