Print Report

CEGL008475 Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya tomentosa / Vaccinium stamineum / Desmodium nudiflorum Piedmont Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: White Oak - Northern Red Oak - Mockernut Hickory / Deerberry / Naked-flower Tick-trefoil Piedmont Forest

Colloquial Name: Piedmont Dry-Mesic Acidic Oak - Hickory Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This forest is found on submesic to subxeric upland sites throughout the Piedmont of Georgia, the Carolinas, Virginia, and south-central Maryland. It favors mid- to upper-slope positions with northerly or easterly aspects, or mid- to lower slopes with more southerly aspects. In drier landscapes, this type occupies habitats considered relatively mesic (e.g., concave slopes, lower slopes, shallow ravines). These sites are described as dry to intermediate in soil moisture. The soils are moderately to strongly acidic and nutrient-poor, being weathered primarily from felsic metamorphic, metasedimentary, and sedimentary rocks, or composed of unconsolidated sediments. At some sites, soils are weathered from interbedded metasedimentary and mafic rocks, resulting in soil chemistry that is intermediate or slightly basic. Stands of this forest are closed to somewhat open and are dominated by mixtures of oaks and hickories, with Quercus alba being most prevalent, along with Quercus rubra, Quercus coccinea, Quercus velutina, Quercus falcata, Carya tomentosa, Carya ovalis, and Carya glabra. In forests with a history of disturbance, such as selective logging or windstorms, early-successional species such as Liriodendron tulipifera or Pinus sp. may codominate. In addition, Pinus spp., Liriodendron tulipifera, Liquidambar styraciflua, and Acer rubrum may be common. Understory species include Acer rubrum, Cornus florida, Oxydendrum arboreum, Ilex opaca, and Nyssa sylvatica. Shrubs include Vaccinium stamineum, Vaccinium pallidum, Viburnum acerifolium, Viburnum rafinesqueanum, and Euonymus americanus. The woody vines Vitis rotundifolia and Toxicodendron radicans often are present. Herbs vary from sparse to moderately dense, with dry-mesophytic, acid-tolerant species such as Hexastylis spp., Goodyera pubescens, Chimaphila maculata, Desmodium nudiflorum, Maianthemum racemosum, Polygonatum biflorum, Viola hastata, Tipularia discolor, and Hieracium venosum prevalent. This association occupies less nutrient-rich habitats than ~Quercus rubra - Quercus alba - Carya glabra / Geranium maculatum Forest (CEGL007237)$$.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: At the northern end of the range, the classification is supported by analysis of a 1250-plot regional dataset assembled for the National Capital Region and Mid-Atlantic national parks vegetation mapping project. In that analysis, this association was represented by 116 Virginia plots and several from Montgomery County, Maryland.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Stands of this forest are closed to somewhat open, and are dominated by mixtures of oaks and hickories, with Quercus alba being most prevalent, along with Quercus rubra, Quercus coccinea, Quercus velutina, Carya tomentosa (= Carya alba), Carya ovalis, and Carya glabra. Carya spp. are common in this type but often most abundant in the understory. In Virginia examples, Quercus montana (= Quercus prinus) and Quercus falcata are inconstant but sometimes important. In addition, Pinus spp., Liriodendron tulipifera, Liquidambar styraciflua, and Acer rubrum may be common, especially in disturbed stands. Understory species include Acer rubrum, Cornus florida, Oxydendrum arboreum, Ilex opaca, and Nyssa sylvatica. Shrubs include Vaccinium stamineum, Vaccinium pallidum, Viburnum acerifolium, Viburnum rafinesqueanum, and Euonymus americanus. In Virginia, Vaccinium pallidum and Vaccinium stamineum are the principal ericads of patchy low-shrub layers (G. Fleming pers. comm. 2004). The woody vines Vitis rotundifolia and Toxicodendron radicans often are present. Herbs vary from sparse to moderately dense, with dry-mesophytic species such as Hexastylis spp., Goodyera pubescens, Chimaphila maculata, Desmodium nudiflorum, Maianthemum racemosum, Polygonatum biflorum, Viola hastata, Tipularia discolor, Carex albicans, and Hieracium venosum prevalent (Schafale and Weakley 1990). Although not lush, these forests can be impressively species-rich, with high woody diversity and many low-cover herbaceous species occurring. Species richness of 116 Virginia plots averages 53 taxa per 400 m2, varying from a low of 17 to a high of 114. Low species richness in this type is most often the result of long-term overgrazing by large deer populations. At least some of the stands with high species richness are located on sites where deer populations are effectively controlled.

Dynamics:  Disturbed areas have increased amounts of pines and weedy hardwoods such as Acer rubrum, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Liquidambar styraciflua, with the amounts depending on the degree of canopy opening. Areas that were cultivated are generally dominated by even-aged pine stands which are replaced by the climax oaks and hickories only as the pines die. Logged areas may have a mixture of hardwoods and pines (Schafale and Weakley 1990). Under natural conditions, these forests are uneven-aged, with old trees present. Reproduction occurs primarily in canopy gaps. Rare, severe natural disturbances such as wind storms may allow pulses of increased regeneration and allow the less shade-tolerant species to remain in the community. However, Skeen et al. (1980) argued that even the shade-intolerant Liriodendron could reproduce enough in gaps to persist in the climax Piedmont forests. The natural fire regime of the Piedmont is not known, but fires certainly occurred periodically. Most of the component trees are able to tolerate light surface fires with little effect. In addition, the recruitment of oaks and hickories generally benefits from periodic fires. However, Acer rubrum is fairly intolerant of fire (especially when young) and often appears to be out-competing the regeneration of oaks in long-unburned stands. In Virginia, Fagus grandifolia and Ilex opaca var. opaca are additional thin-barked, fire-intolerant species that have invaded many fire-suppressed oak-hickory forests. Regular fire may have created a more open forest, with gaps persisting longer than at present and perhaps forming more frequently (Schafale and Weakley 1990).

Environmental Description:  The sites on which this vegetation is found are described as "intermediate" in soil moisture (Jones 1988a, 1988b). Soils are less nutrient-rich than ~Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya (ovata, carolinae-septentrionalis) / Cercis canadensis Forest (CEGL007232)$$. Virginia stands occur on submesic to subxeric uplands with acidic, moderately nutrient-poor soils weathered from felsic metamorphic, metasedimentary, and sedimentary rocks (especially Triassic siltstones), and unconsolidated sediments. However, Virginia soils supporting this type are demonstrably more fertile than those supporting very species-poor mixed oak forests with dense ericaceous shrub layers. At some sites, soils are weathered from interbedded metasedimentary and mafic rocks, resulting in soil chemistry that is intermediate or slightly basic. This type frequently occupies somewhat mesic habitats (e.g., concave slopes, lower slopes, shallow ravines) in dry landscapes where mixed oak/heath types are prevalent. It is a large-patch or matrix type in some parts of Virginia but is not as abundant in the Piedmont as mixed oak/heath forests (G. Fleming pers. comm. 2001). In North Carolina, this is a matrix type, probably the most common forest type remaining in the Piedmont.

Geographic Range: This association occurs throughout the Piedmont of the Carolinas, Virginia, and south-central Maryland. Two plots attributable to this type were sampled from the Piedmont of Georgia. In northern Virginia and Maryland, it also occurs occasionally in the Coastal Plain.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  DC, GA, MD, NC, SC, VA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: merged together to form this new type

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Quercus (velutina, alba) - Fagus grandifolia / Cornus florida Forest (Walton et al. 2001)
= Quercus alba - Carya (alba, glabra) / Cornus florida / Vaccinium pallidum Forest (McCoy and Fleming 2000)
= Quercus alba - Quercus coccinea - Carya (glabra, alba) / Vaccinium pallidum Forest (Fleming 2002a)
= Quercus alba - Quercus coccinea - Carya glabra / Cornus florida / Viburnum acerifolium Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2003)
= Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya (alba, glabra) / Cornus florida / Vaccinium stamineum Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2003)
? Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya (alba, glabra) / Cornus florida / Vaccinium stamineum Forest (Fleming pers. comm.)
= Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya (alba, ovalis) / Carpinus caroliniana / Desmodium nudiflorum Forest (Fleming 2002a)
= Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Carya alba / Carpinus caroliniana / Desmodium nudiflorum - Maianthemum racemosum Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2003)
= Quercus alba - Quercus velutina - Carya (alba, glabra) / Cornus florida / Vaccinium stamineum Forest (Fleming 2002a)
= Quercus alba - Quercus velutina - Carya alba / Cornus florida / Vaccinium stamineum Forest (Fleming and Weber 2003)
= Quercus montana - Quercus alba - Carya glabra / Cornus florida Forest (Fleming 2002b)
= Quercus prinus - Quercus rubra - Carya (ovalis, glabra) / Viburnum acerifolium Forest (Fleming 2002a)
< IA6i. Interior Upland Dry-Mesic Oak - Hickory Forest (Allard 1990)
? White oak - northern red oak - false Solomon''s seal (Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Smilacina racemosa) community type (Jones 1988b)
? White oak - northern red oak - false Solomon''s seal (Quercus alba - Quercus rubra - Smilacina racemosa) community type (Jones 1988a)

Concept Author(s): M.P. Schafale and G.P. Fleming

Author of Description: M.P. Schafale and G.P. Fleming

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 02-15-07

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2002a. Ecological communities of the Bull Run Mountains, Virginia: Baseline vegetation and floristic data for conservation planning and natural area stewardship. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 274 pp. plus appendices.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2002b. Preliminary classification of Piedmont & Inner Coastal Plain vegetation types in Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02-14. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 29 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2007. Ecological communities of the Potomac Gorge in Virginia: Composition, floristics, and environmental dynamics. Natural Heritage Technical Report 07-12. Unpublished report submitted to the National Park Service. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 341 pp. plus appendices.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Fleming, G. P., K. Taverna, and P. P. Coulling. 2007b. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, eastern region. Regional (VA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2007. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and J. T. Weber. 2003. Inventory, classification, and map of forested ecological communities at Manassas National Battlefield Park, Virginia. Unpublished report submitted to the National Park Service. Natural Heritage Technical Report 03-07. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 101 pp. plus appendix.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2003. Preliminary vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2003. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. Taverna. 2006. Vegetation classification for the National Capitol Region parks, western region. Regional (VA-WVA-MD-DC) analysis prepared for NatureServe and USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, March 2006. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond.
  • Fleming, Gary P. Personal communication. Ecologist, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA.
  • Harrison, J. W. 2011. The natural communities of Maryland: 2011 working list of ecological community groups and community types. Unpublished report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis. 33 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
  • Jones, S. M. 1988a. Old-growth forests within the Piedmont of South Carolina. Natural Areas Journal 8:31-37.
  • Jones, S. M. 1988b. Old-growth, steady state forests within the Piedmont of South Carolina. Ph.D. dissertation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC. 94 pp.
  • McCoy, K. M., and G. P. Fleming. 2000. Ecological communities of U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Belvoir, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Army. Natural Heritage Technical Report 00-08. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 156 pp. plus appendices.
  • McManamay, R. H. 2015. Vegetation mapping at Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR--2015/1088. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 278 pp.
  • NRCS [Natural Resources Conservation Service]. 2006b. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Franklin County, Virginia. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX. [http://SoilDataMart.nrc.usda.gov/]
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Patterson, K. D. 2008a. Vegetation classification and mapping at Appomattox Court House National Historical Park, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/125. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Patterson, K. D. 2008b. Vegetation classification and mapping at Booker T. Washington National Monument, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/100. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 173 pp.
  • Patterson, K. D. 2008c. Vegetation classification and mapping at Colonial National Historical Park, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/129. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 369 pp.
  • Patterson, K. D. 2008e. Vegetation classification and mapping at Petersburg National Battlefield, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/127. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 235 pp.
  • Patterson, K. D. 2008f. Vegetation classification and mapping at Richmond National Battlefield Park, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2008/128. National Park Service. Philadelphia, PA. 244 pp.
  • Patterson, Karen D. Personal communication. Ecologist, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Skeen, J. N., M. E. B. Carter, and H. L. Ragsdale. 1980. Yellow-poplar: The Piedmont case. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 107:1-6.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • Taverna, K. and K. D. Patterson. 2008. Vegetation classification and mapping at Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania National Military Park, Virginia. Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR-2008/126. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 277 pp.
  • Walton, D. P., P. P. Coulling, J. Weber, A. Belden, Jr., and A. C. Chazal. 2001. A plant community classification and natural heritage inventory of the Pamunkey River floodplain. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Natural Heritage Technical Report 01-19. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 200 pp. plus appendices.
  • White, Jr., R. D., and T. Govus. 2005. Vascular plant inventory and plant community classification for Kings Mountain National Military Park. NatureServe, Durham, NC. 178 pp.
  • White, R. D., Jr., and M. Pyne. 2003. Vascular plant inventory and plant community classification for Guilford Courthouse National Military Park. Prepared for the National Park Service. NatureServe, Southeast Regional Office, Durham, NC. 124 pp.
  • White, R. D., Jr., and T. Govus. 2003. Vascular plant inventory and plant community classification for Ninety Six National Historic Site. Prepared for the National Park Service. NatureServe, Durham, NC. 146 pp.