Print Report

CEGL006049 Abies fraseri / Viburnum lantanoides / Dryopteris campyloptera - Oxalis montana / Hylocomium splendens Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Fraser Fir / Hobblebush / Mountain Woodfern - Mountain Woodsorrel / Splendid Feathermoss Forest

Colloquial Name: Fraser Fir Forest (Deciduous Shrub Type)

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This community occurs as island-like stands in the southern Appalachian Mountains. It occurs on steep ridges and mesic, north-facing slopes above 1830 m (6000 feet) elevation, although it may extend lower on some sites. Occurrences of this community have shallow, rocky soils and are often steep and bouldery with seepage areas. This forest has at least 75% of the canopy coverage composed of Abies fraseri, occurring over a sparse to moderate shrub stratum dominated by deciduous species, a diverse herb stratum, and, typically, a well-developed bryophyte layer. The tree canopy has standing dead stems of Abies fraseri and extensive patches of Abies fraseri saplings in canopy gaps. Oxalis montana, Dryopteris campyloptera, and Athyrium filix-femina are often dominant in the herbaceous stratum. Other characteristic species include Vaccinium erythrocarpum, Sambucus racemosa var. racemosa, Rubus allegheniensis, Rubus idaeus ssp. strigosus, Oclemena acuminata, Eurybia chlorolepis, Clintonia borealis, Solidago glomerata, Rugelia nudicaulis, Ageratina altissima var. roanensis, Chelone lyonii, Circaea alpina ssp. alpina, Streptopus lanceolatus var. roseus, Viola macloskeyi ssp. pallens, Geum radiatum, Huperzia lucidula, Ptilium crista-castrensis, Rhytidiadelphus triquetrus, and Hylocomium splendens. This is a relatively broadly defined community element with much structural and compositional variation.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This needle-leaved evergreen forest has greater than 75% canopy coverage by Abies fraseri, typically with many standing dead stems. Canopy trees are of small diameter (less than 20 cm) and short stature (less than 10 m tall), giving these forests a stunted appearance. Other species that may occur in the canopy or subcanopy with low coverage are Picea rubens, Sorbus americana, Betula alleghaniensis, Prunus pensylvanica, and Acer spicatum. There may be considerable variation in the density of shrub cover, but it is typically low (<20%) and dominated by deciduous species. Typical shrub species include Viburnum lantanoides, Vaccinium erythrocarpum, Sambucus racemosa var. racemosa (= Sambucus racemosa var. pubens), Menziesia pilosa, Rubus allegheniensis, and Rubus idaeus ssp. strigosus. Where shrubs are sparse, herb cover is usually dense, with Oxalis montana, Athyrium filix-femina ssp. asplenioides, and Dryopteris campyloptera often dominant. Other common herbs include Oclemena acuminata (= Aster acuminatus), Eurybia chlorolepis (= Aster chlorolepis), Clintonia borealis, Solidago glomerata, Rugelia nudicaulis, Ageratina altissima var. roanensis, Chelone lyonii, Circaea alpina ssp. alpina, Streptopus lanceolatus (= Streptopus roseus), Viola macloskeyi ssp. pallens, Geum radiatum, and Huperzia lucidula. Mosses, liverworts, and lichens grow densely on fallen logs, tree trunks, and the forest floor, giving the community a distinctive carpeted appearance. Characteristic bryophyte species include Hylocomium splendens, Ptilium crista-castrensis, Rhytidiadelphus triquetrus, and Hylocomiastrum umbratum.

Dynamics:  This community is affected by debris avalanches, wind disturbance and lightning fire. Because of the shallow soils and extreme wind exposure, this forest is susceptible to large blowdowns. Logging and damage by the balsam woolly adelgid has greatly increased the effect of natural windfall. This community is a late-successional type, but it is subject to repeated disturbance. Prunus pensylvanica is a dominant species immediately following disturbance. In later successional stages, Betula alleghaniensis increases in dominance. An exotic insect, the balsam woolly adelgid (Adelges piceae), invaded the Southern Appalachians in the late 1950s and has drastically altered the last undisturbed remnants of this community. This exotic pest kills mature Abies fraseri within seven years of infestation. Abies fraseri is the only rare plant species associated with this vegetation in Virginia. In areas where mature Abies fraseri has been lost to woolly adelgid infestation, thickets of Rubus spp., Abies fraseri seedlings and saplings, Betula alleghaniensis, and Sorbus americana are dominant. Over time, Picea rubens, Betula alleghaniensis, Abies fraseri, Acer spicatum, and Sorbus americana increase in the tree layer, while Abies fraseri, Menziesia pilosa, Rubus idaeus ssp. strigosus, and Sambucus racemosa increase in the shrub layer (White et al. 1993). Succession is especially slow after severe disturbance such as logging and slash fires. The most severely disturbed sites are predominately Prunus pensylvanica and Rubus spp. and may remain in a non-forested stage of succession for 60 years or more.

Environmental Description:  This community typically occurs on steep ridges and north-facing slopes above 1830 m (6000 feet) elevation, although it may extend lower on some sites. These forests occur on all topographic positions except the steepest rocky cliffs of the highest summits. Soils that support this community are classified as Inceptisols and are shallow, rocky, and often have a thick organic layer. Moisture regimes are mesic to wet, due to high rainfall, abundant cloud cover, fog deposition, and low temperatures.

Geographic Range: This community occurs as island-like stands on the highest areas (>1830 m [6000 feet]) in the southern Appalachian Mountains of eastern Tennessee, western North Carolina, and southwestern Virginia. It is extremely limited in distribution and is restricted to the following mountain areas: Great Smoky Mountains, Black Mountains, Balsam Mountain, Plott Balsam Mountain, Grandfather Mountain, and Mount Rogers (Ramseur 1960).

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  NC, TN, VA




Confidence Level: High

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G1

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Abies fraseri / Dryopteris campyloptera - Oxalis montana Forest (Fleming and Patterson 2009a)
= Abies fraseri / Dryopteris campyloptera - Oxalis montana Forest (Fleming and Coulling 2001)
? Fraser Fir (6) (USFS 1988)
< IA4b. Fraser Fir Forest (Allard 1990)
? Oligotrophic Forest (Rawinski 1992)
< Red Spruce - Fraser Fir: 34 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): K.D. Patterson

Author of Description: K.D. Patterson

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 11-04-94

  • Adams, H. S., S. L. Stephenson, T. J. Blasing, and D. N. Duvick. 1985. Growth trend declines of spruce and fir in mid-Appalachian subalpine forest. Environmental and Experimental Botany 25:315-325.
  • Adams, H. S., and S. L. Stephenson. 1991. High elevation coniferous forests in Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science 42:391-399.
  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Anderson, L. E., H. A. Crum, and W. R. Buck. 1990. List of mosses of North America north of Mexico. The Bryologist 93:448-499.
  • Belden, A., Jr., G. P. Fleming, and J. C. Ludwig. 1994. A Natural Heritage inventory of the Appalachian Trail in Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 94-16. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. Unpublished report submitted to the Appalachian Trail Conference and George Washington and Jefferson National Forests. 608 pp. plus appendices.
  • Braun, E. L. 1950. Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Hafner Press, New York. 596 pp.
  • Brown, D. M. 1941. Vegetation of Roan Mountain: A phytosociological and successional study. Ecological Monographs 11:61-97.
  • Bruck, R. I. 1988. Interactions of spruce-fir pathogens, insects, and ectomychorrhizae on the etiology and epidemiology of boreal montane forest decline in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Pages 133-143 in: Proceedings of the US/FRG research symposium: Effects of atmospheric pollutants on the spruce-fir forests of the eastern U.S. and the Federal Republic of Germany. General Technical Report NE-120. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
  • Busing, R. T., E. E. C. Clebsch, C. C. Eagar, and E. F. Pauley. 1988. Two decades of change in a Great Smoky Mountains spruce-fir forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 115:25-31.
  • Crandall, D. L. 1958. Ground vegetation patterns of the spruce-fir area of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ecological Monographs 28:337-360.
  • Davis, J. H., Jr. 1930. Vegetation of the Black Mountains of North Carolina: An ecological study. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 45:291-318.
  • Dull, C. W., J. D. Ward, H. D. Brown, G. W. Ryan, W. H. Clerke, and R. J. Uhler. 1988a. Evaluation of spruce and fir mortality in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Protection report R8-PR 13. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region. 92 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2009a. A vegetation classification for the Appalachian Trail: Virginia south to Georgia. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. In-house analysis, March 2009.
  • Fleming, G. P., and P. P. Coulling. 2001. Ecological communities of the George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Preliminary classification and description of vegetation types. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. 317 pp.
  • McLeod, D. E. 1988. Vegetation patterns, floristics, and environmental relationships in the Black and Craggy mountains of North Carolina. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 222 pp.
  • NCNHP [North Carolina Natural Heritage Program]. 1993. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program biennial protection plan. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 120 pp.
  • Nicholas, N. S., S. M. Zedaker, C. Eagar, and F. T. Bonner. 1992. Seedling recruitment and stand regeneration in spruce-fir forests of the Great Smoky Mountains. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 119:289-299.
  • Oosting, H. J., and W. D. Billings. 1951. A comparison of virgin spruce-fir forest in the Northern and Southern Appalachian system. Ecology 32:84-103.
  • Peet, R. K., T. R. Wentworth, M. P. Schafale, and A.S. Weakley. No date. Unpublished data of the North Carolina Vegetation Survey. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Ramseur, G. S. 1960. The vascular flora of high mountain communities of the Southern Appalachians. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 76:82-112.
  • Rawinski, T. J. 1992. A classification of Virginia''s indigenous biotic communities: Vegetated terrestrial, palustrine, and estuarine community classes. Unpublished document. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. Natural Heritage Technical Report No. 92-21. Richmond, VA. 25 pp.
  • Rheinhardt, R. D., and S. A. Ware. 1984. The vegetation of the Balsam Mountains of southwestern Virginia: A phytosociological study. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 111:287-300.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • Stephenson, S. L., and H. S. Adams. 1984. The spruce-fir forest on the summit of Mount Rogers in southwestern Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 111:69-75.
  • TDNH [Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage]. 2018. Unpublished data. Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage, Nashville, TN.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1988. Silvicultural examination and prescription field book. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region. Atlanta, GA. 35 pp.
  • Weakley, A. S., compiler. 1993. Natural Heritage Program list of the rare plant species of North Carolina. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh. 79 pp.
  • White, P. 1984a. Impacts of cultural and historic resources on natural diversity: Lessons from Great Smoky Mountains National Park, North Carolina and Tennessee. Pages 119-132 in: J. L. Cooley and J. H. Cooley, editors. 1984. Natural diversity in forest ecosystems. Proceedings of a workshop. University of Georgia, Institute of Ecology, Athens. 282 pp.
  • White, P. S., E. R. Buckner, J. D. Pittillo, and C. V. Cogbill. 1993. High-elevation forests: Spruce-fir forests, northern hardwoods forests, and associated communities. Pages 305-337 in: W. H. Martin, S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht, editors. Biodiversity of the southeastern United States: Upland terrestrial communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • White, P. S., and S. T. A. Pickett. 1985. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: An introduction. Pages 3-13 in: P. S. White and S. T. A. Pickett, editors. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
  • White, P. S., editor. 1984b. The Southern Appalachian spruce-fir ecosystem: Its biology and threats. Research/Resource Management Report SER-71. USDI National Park Service. 268 pp.
  • Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26:1-80.