Print Report
CEGL002105 Fraxinus nigra - Mixed Hardwoods - Conifers / Cornus sericea / Carex spp. Swamp Forest
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Black Ash - Mixed Hardwoods - Conifers / Red-osier Dogwood / Sedge species Swamp Forest
Colloquial Name: Black Ash - Mixed Hardwoods Swamp
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This black ash - mixed hardwoods and conifer swamp forest is found widely in the northern midwestern region of the United States and into the subboreal region of central Canada. Sites are found on well-decomposed woody peat or fine mineral soil. The type is found where perched wet pockets occur on fine sandy, clay loamy to fine loamy soils in valleys with impeded drainage or near shores. Hydrology can vary from seasonally flooded to saturated. Conditions are often transitional to uplands. Canopy structure is variable, ranging from 30-90% cover. The canopy is dominated by Fraxinus nigra (at least 50% cover), with a diverse mix of hardwoods and conifers in the main and subcanopies, including Abies balsamea, Acer rubrum, Betula papyrifera, Betula alleghaniensis, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Picea glauca, Populus balsamifera, Populus tremuloides, Thuja occidentalis, Tilia americana, and Ulmus americana. Shrub and sapling species include Abies balsamea, Acer spicatum, Cornus sericea, Corylus cornuta, Lonicera canadensis, Prunus virginiana, Ribes triste, Rubus idaeus, and Rubus pubescens. Herbaceous species include Aralia nudicaulis, Eurybia macrophylla, Athyrium filix-femina, Carex gracillima, Carex intumescens, Cinna latifolia, Circaea alpina, Clintonia borealis, Dryopteris carthusiana, Equisetum sylvaticum, Fragaria virginiana, Maianthemum canadense, Mitella nuda, Streptopus lanceolatus var. longipes, Thalictrum pubescens, and Trientalis borealis. Mosses include Climacium dendroides, Plagiomnium spp. A floodplain variant may also occur, with more hardwood dominance, with wetter species present, such as Alnus incana, Calamagrostis canadensis, and Caltha palustris. Diagnostic features include the dominance by Fraxinus nigra.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: This type description is essentially subboreal in content, emphasizing the northern/western part of the range. It''s possible that this type is only found in northern Minnesota and central to northwestern Ontario, because types that contain a stronger representation of northern hardwoods and other more typical "Laurentian-Acadian" species are placed in ~Acer rubrum - Fraxinus spp. - Betula papyrifera / Cornus canadensis Swamp Forest (CEGL002071)$$. Stands in Michigan and Wisconsin and central Ontario may more consistently fit that type. For examples, see the description in Michigan provided by the Manistee National Forest FEC, ELTP 74 (Cleland et al. 1994), which lists Hamamelis virginiana, Salix spp. Viburnum acerifolium, and Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides in the shrub layer; and descriptions from central Minnesota (MNNHP 1993, Wovcha et al. 1995), which include virtually no conifers, lack a number of boreal species, and include others, such as the shrubs Ilex verticillata and Toxicodendron vernix, and the herbs Arisaema triphyllum, Glyceria striata, Impatiens capensis, Osmunda cinnamomea, and Onoclea sensibilis. A seepage variant has also been described in Minnesota, containing Carex bromoides and Symplocarpus foetidus. This seepage variant may resemble the riparian variant described in northern Ontario (MNNHP 1993, Harris et al. 1996 -W34). Finally, in Wisconsin stands have been described with a tree layer of Fraxinus nigra, Tilia americana, Picea glauca, a ground layer dominated by Matteuccia struthiopteris and Laportea canadensis, and a diverse mix of spring ephemerals that are more typical of southern Wisconsin (E. Epstein pers. comm. 1999).
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: Canopy structure is variable, ranging from 30-90% cover. The canopy is dominated by Fraxinus nigra (at least 50% cover), with a diverse mix of hardwoods and conifers in the main and subcanopies, including Abies balsamea, Acer rubrum, Betula papyrifera, Betula alleghaniensis, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Picea glauca, Populus balsamifera, Populus tremuloides, Thuja occidentalis, Tilia americana, and Ulmus americana. Shrub and sapling species include Abies balsamea, Acer spicatum, Cornus sericea, Corylus cornuta, Lonicera canadensis, Prunus virginiana, Ribes triste, Rubus idaeus, and Rubus pubescens. Herbaceous species include Aralia nudicaulis, Eurybia macrophylla (= Aster macrophyllus), Athyrium filix-femina, Carex gracillima, Carex intumescens, Cinna latifolia, Circaea alpina, Clintonia borealis, Dryopteris carthusiana, Equisetum sylvaticum, Fragaria virginiana, Maianthemum canadense, Mitella nuda, Streptopus lanceolatus var. longipes (= Streptopus roseus), Thalictrum pubescens, and Trientalis borealis. Mosses include Climacium dendroides, Plagiomnium spp. (Sims et al. 1989, MNNHP 1993, Cleland et al. 1994, Harris et al. 1996, Chambers et al. 1997). A floodplain variant may also occur, with more hardwood dominance, with wetter species present, such as Alnus incana, Calamagrostis canadensis, and Caltha palustris (Harris et al. 1996). Diagnostic features include the dominance by Fraxinus nigra.
Dynamics: No Data Available
Environmental Description: Sites are found on well-decomposed woody peat or fine mineral soil. The type is found where perched wet pockets occur on fine sandy, clay loamy to fine loamy soils in valleys with impeded drainage or near shores. Hydrology can vary from seasonally flooded to saturated. Conditions are often transitional to uplands (Sims et al. 1989, MNNHP 1993, Cleland et al. 1994, Chambers et al. 1997).
Geographic Range: This black ash - mixed hardwood and conifer swamp forest is found widely in the northern midwestern region of the United States and into the boreal region of central Canada, ranging from northern Minnesota northward to northwestern Ontario and Manitoba, and eastward possibly through northern Wisconsin, Michigan and central and northeastern Ontario.
Nations: CA,US
States/Provinces: MB, MI, MN, ND, ON, QC?, WI
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.683995
Confidence Level: High
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G4
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.3 Temperate Flooded & Swamp Forest Formation | F026 | 1.B.3 |
Division | 1.B.3.Na Eastern North American-Great Plains Flooded & Swamp Forest Division | D011 | 1.B.3.Na |
Macrogroup | 1.B.3.Na.3 <i>Tsuga canadensis - Fraxinus nigra - Larix laricina</i> Flooded & Swamp Forest Macrogroup | M504 | 1.B.3.Na.3 |
Group | 1.B.3.Na.3.d Northern White-cedar - Black Ash - Red Maple Swamp Forest Group | G046 | 1.B.3.Na.3.d |
Alliance | A4462 <i>Acer rubrum - Fraxinus</i> spp. - Paper Birch Laurentian Swamp Forest Alliance | A4462 | 1.B.3.Na.3.d |
Association | CEGL002105 Black Ash - Mixed Hardwoods - Conifers / Red-osier Dogwood / Sedge species Swamp Forest | CEGL002105 | 1.B.3.Na.3.d |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Fraxinus nigra - Mixed Hardwoods - Conifers / Cornus sericea / Carex spp. Forest (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Northern Hardwood Swamp Black Ash Subtype]
= ELTP 74 - Black ash-basswood-Viola plant association (Cleland et al. 1994)
= ELTP 74 - Black ash-basswood-Viola plant association (Cleland et al. 1994)
- CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
- Chambers, B. A., B. J. Naylor, J. Nieppola, B. Merchant, and P. Uhlig. 1997. Field guide to forest ecosystems of central Ontario. Southcentral Science Section (SCSS) Field Guide FG-01, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, North Bay, Ontario, Canada. 200 pp.
- Cleland, D. T., J. B. Hart, G. E. Host, K. S. Pregitzer, and C. W. Ramm. 1994. Field guide to the ecological classification and inventory system of the Huron-Manistee National Forest. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
- Greenall, J. A. 1996. Manitoba''s terrestrial plant communities. MS Report 96-02. Manitoba Conservation Data Centre, Winnipeg.
- Harris, A. G., S. C. McMurray, P. W. C. Uhlig, J. K. Jeglum, R. F. Foster, and G. D. Racey. 1996. Field guide to the wetland ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Northwest Science and Technology, Thunder Bay, Ontario. Field guide FG-01. 74 pp. plus appendix.
- Homoya, M. A., J. Aldrich, J. Bacone, L. Casebere, and T. Post. 1988. Indiana natural community classification. Indiana Natural Heritage Program, Indianapolis, IN. Unpublished manuscript.
- Hop, K., D. Faber-Langendoen, M. Lew-Smith, N. Aaseng, and S. Lubinski. [1999]. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota. USDI U.S. Geological Survey, La Crosse, WI. 210 pp.
- Hop, K., S. Menard, J. Drake, S. Lubinski, D. Faber-Langendoen, and J. Dieck. 2010b. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Grand Portage National Monument, Minnesota. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLKN/NRR-2010/200. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 202 pp.
- Hop, K., S. Menard, J. Drake, S. Lubinski, and J. Dieck. 2010a. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, Wisconsin. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLKN/NRR-2010/199. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 310 pp.
- Hop, K., S. Menard, J. Drake, S. Lubinski, and J. Dieck. 2010c. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, Michigan. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLKN/NRR-2010/201. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. 358 pp.
- Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
- Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
- MNNHP [Minnesota Natural Heritage Program]. 1993. Minnesota''s native vegetation: A key to natural communities. Version 1.5. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program, St. Paul, MN. 110 pp.
- Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
- Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003-2005a. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota. Three volumes: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province (2003), The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (2005c), The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces (2005b). Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
- Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2005c. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota: The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
- NDNHI [North Dakota Natural Heritage Inventory]. 2018. Unpublished data. Vegetation classification of North Dakota. North Dakota Natural Heritage Inventory, North Dakota Parks & Recreation Department, Bismarck.
- ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
- Sims, R. A., W. D. Towill, K. A. Baldwin, and G. M. Wickware. 1989. Field guide to the forest ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto. 191 pp.
- TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. 1999b. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Classification of the vegetation of Isle Royale National Park. The Nature Conservancy, Midwest Regional Office, Minneapolis, MN, and International Headquarters, Arlington, VA. 143 pp.
- WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]
- Wovcha, D. S., B. C. Delaney, and G. Nordquist. 1995. Minnesota''s St. Croix Valley and Anoka Sandplain: A guide to native habitats. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. 234 pp.