Print Report

CEGL000343 Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Vaccinium myrtillus Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Whortleberry Forest

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This subalpine conifer forest association occurs in the southern Rocky Mountains extending to high mountains and plateaus of central and southwestern New Mexico, southeastern and eastern Arizona and southeastern Utah at elevations between 2713 and 3500 m (8900-11,460 feet). This type is characterized by deep snowpack and brief, cool summers. Stands are common in the middle to upper subalpine zones in the southern extent on all aspects and slopes, but are more common in upper montane and lower subalpine zones in the northern portion of its range. Sites are relatively mesic and are typically on mid to lower slopes with cooler northerly or easterly aspects, e.g., less xeric and cold than forests with understories dominated by Vaccinium scoparium or Ribes spp., but less mesic stands with Carex rossii- or Carex geyeri-dominated understories. Soils are typically shallow (sometimes deeper than 60 cm), rocky and loamy. Litter and duff cover a significant portion of the ground surface (25-40%). Bedrock, large rock, and small rock combined cover 15-50%. Moss and lichen cover is 3-35%. The vegetation has a moderately dense to dense tree canopy codominated by Picea engelmannii and Abies lasiocarpa, with an understory characterized by a dwarf-shrub layer dominated by Vaccinium myrtillus. Populus tremuloides and Pinus contorta (northern stands only) are the most common seral species, though Pseudotsuga menziesii occurs at lower elevations. In the understory, Vaccinium scoparium may be present but is usually trace to less than half the cover of Vaccinium myrtillus. Other shrubs may be present at low cover such as Acer glabrum, Linnaea borealis, Lonicera involucrata, Mahonia repens, Paxistima myrsinites, and Ribes montigenum. Herbaceous species such as Arnica cordifolia, Bromus ciliatus, Carex rossii, Erigeron eximius (warm, moist sites), Geranium richardsonii, Lathyrus spp., Orthilia secunda, Osmorhiza berteroi, Pedicularis racemosa, Orthilia secunda, and Thalictrum fendleri are species which are commonly present with low cover values.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Picea engelmannii and Abies lasiocarpa codominate the overstory. Vaccinium myrtillus dominates the understory and is diagnostic for this type. Pseudotsuga menziesii, Pinus strobiformis, and Pinus flexilis may occur as accidental species.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: In the main portion of this association''s range (high mountains of Arizona, southern Colorado and New Mexico), where Vaccinium scoparium is less common in mid to upper subalpine spruce-fir forests (DeVelice et al. 1986, Fitzhugh et al. 1987, Muldavin et al. 1996), this association appears to occur in a wider variety of sites. However, farther north it appears to be more common in the upper montane and lower subalpine zones in the northern portion of its range on relatively mesic mid to lower slopes with cooler northerly or easterly aspects (Komarkova et al. 1988b). Stuever and Hayden (1997a) identified four phases: whortleberry or typic phase, twinflower phase, thimbleberry phase, and cliffbush phase.

Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Plant Association from Washington needs further review to determine its relationship to stands in this association.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This conifer forest association has a moderately dense to dense tree canopy codominated by Picea engelmannii and Abies lasiocarpa, with an understory characterized by a dwarf-shrub layer dominated by Vaccinium myrtillus. Populus tremuloides and Pinus contorta (northern stands only) are the most common seral species, though Pseudotsuga menziesii occurs at lower elevations. In the understory, Vaccinium scoparium may be present but is usually trace to less than half the cover of Vaccinium myrtillus. Other shrubs may be present at low cover such as Acer glabrum, Linnaea borealis, Lonicera involucrata, Lonicera utahensis, Mahonia repens, Paxistima myrsinites, and Ribes montigenum. Herbaceous species such as Arnica cordifolia, Bromus ciliatus var. ciliatus (= Bromopsis ciliata), Bromus ciliatus var. richardsonii (= Bromus richardsonii), Carex rossii, Erigeron eximius (warm, moist sites), Geranium richardsonii, Lathyrus spp., Orthilia secunda, Osmorhiza berteroi (= Osmorhiza chilensis), Osmorhiza depauperata, Pedicularis racemosa, Orthilia secunda (= Pyrola secunda), and Thalictrum fendleri are species which are commonly present with low cover values.

Dynamics:  This type has not been classified into a fire group, for its area of distribution. However, DeVelice et al. (1986) state that the environment and floristics of this type are almost the same as those of ~Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Vaccinium scoparium Forest (CEGL000344)$$. Crane (1982) places the Abies lasiocarpa/Vaccinium scoparium association into fire group fifteen, which are the northern Colorado and Wyoming subalpine fir and spruce stands.

Fire and or blowdowns may result in aspen as a principal tree (early-seral stage); herb cover is scarce and comprised mostly of graminoids. Evidence of fire and/or windthrow can be found in most stands. Crown fires tend to result in even-aged stands. Windthrown and lighter intensity fires with accompanying gap-phase reproduction produce uneven-aged and in time mixed stands (Niering and Lowe 1984). Stromberg and Patten (1991) characterize the Pinaleno Mountains as having an abundance of old-growth stands (developed and undisturbed over centuries, having large old trees, a multilayered canopy and many downed logs/standing dead trees). The spruce-fir stands have few disturbed sites, but data suggest a slow recovery from disturbance. Following disturbance, such as fire, within 30 years or so, Picea becomes the dominating colonizing species. Eighty to 150 years later, Abies lasiocarpa may invade along with additional recruitment of Picea. In about 150 to 200 years, the stand reaches maturity and old-growth at 250 to 350 years. The absence of any old-growth Abies lasiocarpa stands, probably indicates that significant disturbance has occurred within the past 400 years.

Environmental Description:  This subalpine forest association occurs in the southern Rocky Mountains extending to high mountains and plateaus of central and southwestern New Mexico, southeastern and eastern Arizona and southeastern Utah at elevations between 2713 and 3500 m (8900-11,460 feet). This type is characterized by deep snowpack and brief, cool summers. Climate data from the White Mountains of Arizona (Fitzhugh et al. 1987) show a mean annual precipitation for this type of 76-89 cm (30-35 inches). Snow course data from the Mogollon Mountains (Fitzhugh et al. 1987) show mean snow depths of 94-130 cm (37-51 inches) by February 1, increasing to 119-183 cm (47-72 inches) by around April 1 over 17 years of record. Stands are common in the middle to upper subalpine zones in the southern extent on all aspects and slopes (DeVelice et al. 1986, Fitzhugh et al. 1987), but are more common in upper montane and lower subalpine zones in the northern portion of its range (Komarkova et al. 1988b). Sites are relatively mesic and are typically on mid to lower slopes with cooler northerly or easterly aspects, e.g., less xeric and cold than forests with understories dominated by Vaccinium scoparium or Ribes spp., but less mesic stands with Carex rossii- or Carex geyeri-dominated understories. Soils are typically shallow, often rocky, clay, sandy or silt loam derived from granite, intrusive porphyritics and various other rocks. Litter and duff cover a significant portion of the ground surface, between 25-40%. Bedrock, large rock, and small rock combined cover 15-50%. Moss and lichen cover is often significant (3-35%).

Geographic Range: This subalpine forest association is found in the high mountains of northern and southwestern New Mexico, southeastern and eastern Arizona (Pinaleno and White mountains), southeastern Utah (La Sal Mountains), and Colorado.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CO, NM, UT




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Abies bifolia / Vaccinium myrtillus (Stuever and Hayden 1997a) [Describes four phases: Vaccinium myrtillus, Linnaea borealis, Rubus parviflorus, and Jamesia americana.]
= Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Vaccinium myrtillus Plant Association (Johnston 1987) [Includes stands with Pinus contorta codominant.]
> Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus - Rubus parviflora Habitat Type (Muldavin et al. 1996) [A phase of Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Habitat Type described by DeVelice et al. (1986), Moir and Ludwig (1979) and Fitzhugh et al. (1987).]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Habitat Type (Alexander et al. 1987)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Habitat Type (Larson and Moir 1987)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Habitat Type (Youngblood and Mauk 1985)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Habitat Type (Muldavin et al. 1996) [Occurs as far south as Pinaleno Mountains.]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Habitat Type (Komarkova et al. 1988b)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Habitat Type/Association (Komarkova 1986)
? Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Plant Association (Lillybridge et al. 1995)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium scoparium Habitat Type (Hoffman and Alexander 1980)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium scoparium Habitat Type (Moir and Ludwig 1979) [In northern New Mexico Vaccinium scoparium is important, and in southern New Mexico Vaccinium myrtillus is important.]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium scoparium Habitat Type (Hoffman and Alexander 1983)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium scoparium Habitat Type (Wasser and Hess 1982)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Habitat Type (DeVelice et al. 1986) [found in northern New Mexico and southern Colorado between 8900-11200 feet.]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium myrtillus Habitat Type, Vaccinium myrtillus Phase (Fitzhugh et al. 1987) [Includes two phases: the typic Vaccinium myrtillus phase and a more mesic Rubus parviflorus phase. Found in the Apache National Forest of Arizona and the Gila National Forest of New Mexico above 9500 feet.]
< Picea engelmannii - Abies lasiocarpa / Vaccinium scoparium Habitat Type (Hess and Wasser 1982) [Vaccinium myrtillus occurs with Vaccinium scoparium in the dwarf-shrub layer.]
< Picea engelmannii / Vaccinium myrtillus / Polemonium pulcherrimum Habitat Type (DeVelice et al. 1986) [Includes stands with 5-95% cover of Vaccinium myrtillus. Includes lower elevation stands with Abies lasiocarpa codominant.]
< Mesic Picea, Abies Forest (E4) (Peet 1980)
< Mesic Picea, Abies Forest (E4) (Peet 1975)
< Mesic Picea, Abies Forest (E4) (Peet 1981)

Concept Author(s): M.C. Stuever and J.S. Hayden (1997a)

Author of Description: L.D. Engelking and K.A. Schulz

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 01-14-19

  • Alexander, B. G., Jr., E. L. Fitzhugh, F. Ronco, Jr., and J. A. Ludwig. 1987. A classification of forest habitat types of the northern portion of the Cibola National Forest, NM. General Technical Report RM-143. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 35 pp.
  • Amundsen, C. C. 1967. The subalpine forest of Wild Basin, Front Range, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. 129 pp.
  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • Boyce, D. A. 1977. Vegetation of the South Fork of the White River Valley, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. 312 pp.
  • CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
  • Crane, M. F. 1982. Fire ecology of Rocky Mountain Region forest habitat types. USDA Forest Service final report. 272 pp.
  • DeVelice, R. L., J. A. Ludwig, W. H. Moir, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1986. A classification of forest habitat types of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. General Technical Report RM-131. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 59 pp.
  • Fitzhugh, E. L., W. H. Moir, J. A. Ludwig, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1987. Forest habitat types in the Apache, Gila, and part of the Cibola national forests. General Technical Report RM-145. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 116 pp.
  • Hess, K., and C. H. Wasser. 1982. Grassland, shrubland, and forest habitat types of the White River-Arapaho National Forest. Unpublished final report 53-82 FT-1-19. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 335 pp.
  • Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1980. Forest vegetation of the Routt National Forest in northwestern Colorado: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-221. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 41 pp.
  • Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1983. Forest vegetation of the White River National Forest in western Colorado: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-249. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 36 pp.
  • Johnson, A. W. 1956b. Ecology of subalpine forest communities in the Silver Lake Valley of the Front Range in Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. 121 pp.
  • Johnson, W. M. 1956a. The effect of grazing intensity on plant composition, vigor, and growth of pine-bunchgrass ranges in central Colorado. Ecology 37:790-798.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1984. Plant associations of Region Two. Edition 3.5. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Keammerer, W. R., and R. E. Stoecker. 1980. Vegetation and wildlife studies for the Mount Emmons project. Unpublished report prepared for AMAX Environmental Services, Inc., by Stoecker-Keammerer and Associates, Ecological Consultants, Boulder, CO. 3 volumes.
  • Komarkova, V. 1982. Habitat types on selected parts of the Gunnison and Uncompahgre national forests, first approximation. Unpublished progress report Number 2 to USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Lakewood, CO. 206 pp.
  • Komarkova, V. 1986. Habitat types on selected parts of the Gunnison and Uncompahgre national forests. Unpublished final report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Fort Collins, CO. 270 pp. plus appendices.
  • Komarkova, V. K., R. R. Alexander, and B. C. Johnston. 1988b. Forest vegetation of the Gunnison and parts of the Uncompahgre national forests: A preliminary habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-163. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 65 pp.
  • Langenheim, J. H. 1962. Vegetation and environmental patterns in the Crested Butte area, Gunnison County, Colorado. Ecological Monographs 32:249-285.
  • Larson, M., and W. H. Moir. 1987. Forest and woodland habitat types of northern New Mexico and northern Arizona. Edition 2. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Lillybridge, T. R., B. L. Kovalchik, C. K. Williams, and B. G. Smith. 1995. Field guide for forested plant associations of the Wenatchee National Forest. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-359. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. 335 pp.
  • Marr, J. W. 1964a. Utilization of the Front Range tundra, Colorado. Pages 109-118 in: D. J. Crisp, editor. Grazing in terrestrial and marine environments. Blackwell Scientific Publishing, Oxford, England.
  • Marr, J. W. 1964b. The vegetation of the Boulder area. University of Colorado Museum Leaflet 13:34-42.
  • Marr, J. W. 1965. Forest ecology of the Front Range. Pages 16-20 in: C. Schulz and H. Smith, editors. Guidebook for one-day field Conferences-Boulder area, Colorado. VIIth International Association for Quaternary Research Congress, Nebraska Academy of Science, Lincoln, NE.
  • Marr, J. W. 1967. Ecosystems of the east slope of the Front Range in Colorado. University of Colorado Studies, Series in Biology 8. 134 pp.
  • Marr, J. W., D. Buckner, and C. Mutel. 1973a. Ecological analyses of potential shale oil products pipeline corridors in Colorado and Utah. Unpublished report prepared for Colony Development Operation, Atlantic Richfield Company, Denver, by Thorne Ecological Institute and University of Colorado, Boulder. 96 pp. plus appendices.
  • Marr, J. W., and W. S. Boyd. 1979. Vegetation in the greater Denver area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado. USDI Geologic Survey Miscellaneous Investigative Series, Map I-856-I.
  • Moir, W. H., and J. A. Ludwig. 1979. A classification of spruce-fir and mixed conifer habitat types of Arizona and New Mexico. Research Paper RM-207. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 47 pp.
  • Muldavin, E. H., R. L. DeVelice, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1996. A classification of forest habitat types of southern Arizona and portions of the Colorado Plateau. General Technical Report RM-GTR-287. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 130 pp.
  • Niering, W. A., and C. H. Lowe. 1984. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains: Community types and dynamics. Vegetatio 58:3-28.
  • Peet, R. K. 1975. Forest vegetation of the east slope of the northern Colorado Front Range. Unpublished dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • Peet, R. K. 1980. Forest vegetation of the northern Colorado Front Range, USA: I. Community composition. Unpublished manuscript prepared for Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. 83 pp.
  • Peet, R. K. 1981. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range. Vegetatio 45:3-75.
  • Salas, D. E., J. Stevens, K. Schulz, M. Artmann, B. Friesen, S. Blauer, E. W. Schweiger, and A. Valdez. 2010b. Vegetation classification and mapping project report: Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve. Natural Resource Report NPS/ROMN/NRR--2010/179. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Salas, D., J. Stevens, and K. Schulz. 2005. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Technical Memorandum No. 8260-05-02. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. 161 pp. plus Appendices A-L (733 pp.).
  • Stromberg, J. C., and D. T. Patten. 1991. Dynamics of the spruce-fir forest on the Pinaleno Mountains, Graham Co., Arizona. The Southwestern Naturalist 36(1):37-48.
  • Stuever, M. C., and J. S. Hayden. 1997a. Plant associations of Arizona and New Mexico, edition 3. Volume 1: Forests. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region. Habitat Typing Guides. 291 pp.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1983b. Plant associations of Region Two. Third edition. USDA Forest Service, Region Two, Range, Wildlife, and Ecology, Denver, CO. 379 pp.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1986. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of southern New Mexico and central Arizona (north of the Mogollon Rim). USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 140 pp. plus insert.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1987a. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of northern New Mexico and northern Arizona. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 170 pp. plus insert.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1987b. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of Arizona south of the Mogollon Rim and southwestern New Mexico. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 168 pp. plus insert.
  • Uchytil, R. J. 1991e. Abies lasiocarpa. In: Fire Effects Information System [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). [http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/] (accessed May 26, 2015).
  • Wasser, C. H., and K. Hess. 1982. The habitat types of Region II. USDA Forest Service: A synthesis. Final report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 140 pp.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Youngblood, A. P., and R. L. Mauk. 1985. Coniferous forest habitat types of central and southern Utah. General Technical Report INT-187. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.