Print Report
CEGL002445 Pinus strobus / Acer spicatum - Corylus cornuta Forest
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Eastern White Pine / Mountain Maple - Beaked Hazelnut Forest
Colloquial Name: White Pine / Mountain Maple Mesic Forest
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This white pine forest type is found in the subboreal region of the midwestern United States and in adjacent parts of Canada. Stands occur on moderately deep to deep (>60 cm) sandy or gravelly loam soil. The canopy is dominated by Pinus strobus, often mixed with Pinus resinosa. The lower layer of the canopy consists mainly of Abies balsamea trees and saplings. Other trees that may be found in this layer include Acer rubrum, Betula papyrifera, Betula alleghaniensis, Picea glauca, and Thuja occidentalis. The tall-shrub/sapling layer is moderate to well-developed and consists of Abies balsamea, Acer spicatum, Corylus cornuta, and, less frequently, Amelanchier spp. The low-shrub layer is not well-developed and is dominated by Diervilla lonicera, Linnaea borealis, Vaccinium myrtilloides and Vaccinium angustifolium. The herb stratum is often sparse. Prevalent herbs include Aralia nudicaulis, Eurybia macrophylla, Cornus canadensis, Maianthemum canadense, Polypodium virginianum, and Pteridium aquilinum. Moss species include Dicranum polysetum and Pleurozium schreberi. The forest floor is generally characterized by a deep layer of pine needle litter. Diagnostic features include dominance by Pinus strobus, a well-developed tall-shrub layer with Acer spicatum and Corylus cornuta, and a sparse herb layer.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: The type allows for Pinus strobus-dominated stands or mixed Pinus strobus-conifers, including Pinus resinosa, but is restricted to the subboreal region of northern Minnesota, northwest and northeast Ontario (possibly Quebec), with possible occurrences in extreme northern Wisconsin and Michigan. The type concept is not well-developed in Wisconsin, where it complexes with ~Pinus strobus - (Pinus resinosa) - Quercus rubra Forest (CEGL002480)$$. The limits of the type farther eastward, where it overlaps with ~Pinus strobus - Pinus resinosa / Cornus canadensis Forest (CEGL006253)$$, are also not clear. In some stands Juniperus communis may be present.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: This community is dominated by Pinus strobus. It is often distinguished by a supercanopy of large, old Pinus strobus and scattered Pinus resinosa. The lower layer of the canopy consists mainly of Abies balsamea trees and saplings (Ohmann and Ream 1971). Other trees that may be found in this layer include Betula alleghaniensis, Picea glauca, Thuja occidentalis, Acer rubrum, Acer spicatum, and other trees common to boreal forest landscapes. The tall-shrub layer is moderately to well-developed and consists of Abies balsamea, Acer spicatum, Corylus cornuta, and, less frequently, Amelanchier spp. (Ohmann and Ream 1971, Sims et al. 1989). The low-shrub layer is not well-developed and dominated by Diervilla lonicera, Linnaea borealis, Vaccinium myrtilloides, and Vaccinium angustifolium. The herb stratum is also not well-developed. The deep layer of undecomposed needles that formed the mor humus is not conducive to herb growth (Martin 1959a). Prevalent herbs include Aralia nudicaulis, Eurybia macrophylla (= Aster macrophyllus), Cornus canadensis, Maianthemum canadense, Polypodium virginianum (= Polypodium vulgare), and Pteridium aquilinum. Moss species include Dicranum polysetum and Pleurozium schreberi.
There appear to be two variants of this community. Both are dominated by a supercanopy of white pines. In the first variant of this type in northeastern Minnesota and northwestern Ontario, the understory is dominated by Abies balsamea, and, with no fire regime, the forest appears to succeed to a fir-(birch?) forest (Ohmann and Ream 1970). This type of stand was also found in northeastern Ontario by Martin (1959), in a 25-acre stand estimated to be 100 years old. There were also a few spindly Betula papyrifera trees in the understory. A second variant may be a late-successional stage white pine forest, thought to be 300 years old in the same region, where the understory is dominated by Betula alleghaniensis (= Betula lutea) and Tsuga canadensis. All of the Abies balsamea over 5 cm dbh were dead, although there were many smaller Abies balsamea.
There appear to be two variants of this community. Both are dominated by a supercanopy of white pines. In the first variant of this type in northeastern Minnesota and northwestern Ontario, the understory is dominated by Abies balsamea, and, with no fire regime, the forest appears to succeed to a fir-(birch?) forest (Ohmann and Ream 1970). This type of stand was also found in northeastern Ontario by Martin (1959), in a 25-acre stand estimated to be 100 years old. There were also a few spindly Betula papyrifera trees in the understory. A second variant may be a late-successional stage white pine forest, thought to be 300 years old in the same region, where the understory is dominated by Betula alleghaniensis (= Betula lutea) and Tsuga canadensis. All of the Abies balsamea over 5 cm dbh were dead, although there were many smaller Abies balsamea.
Dynamics: This community is an early- to mid-successional community. Given the appropriate environmental conditions it can be extremely long-lived. Pinus strobus usually follows the establishment of faster-growing species such as Populus spp., Betula papyrifera, or Acer spp., after a disturbance (Frelich 1992). Following a disturbance, such as a fire, Pinus strobus seedling establishment occurs over a period of 20-30 years, using populations of pines near lakeshores or swamps and individual trees that have survived by chance as a seed-source (Frelich 1992). This community is long-lasting, and on more xeric sites, may live for several hundred years due to the ability of pines to replace themselves. On moister soils in northeastern Minnesota, succession to a balsam fir forest occurs (Grigal and Ohmann 1975). Heinselman (1973) studied a community in northeastern Minnesota (BWCA) that had been protected from fire for 360 years, and described it as a successionally advanced community, with a Pinus strobus supercanopy. The canopy consisted of Thuja occidentalis (up to 296 years old), Picea glauca (up to 185 years old), and some Betula papyrifera (up to 162 years old). Thuja occidentalis saplings were abundant, and there was no Pinus strobus regeneration in the understory. He proposed that 460 years after a fire, succession to either an Abies - Thuja - Picea glauca or a Betula forest would be complete. Although it is an early- to mid-successional species, Pinus strobus has a long lifespan, and can replace itself in the canopy by gap-phase reproduction, allowing the community to sustain itself over several hundred years. This process is threatened, however, by the occurrence of white pine blister rust in at least part of the community''s range, particularly in northern Minnesota.
Fire is an important natural disturbance in this community. Although Pinus strobus does not have the more sophisticated adaptations to fire that Pinus resinosa and Pinus banksiana do, Pinus strobus seedling establishment is favored by post-fire conditions, such as exposed mineral soil and high sunlight. Once established, mature Pinus strobus are able to survive surface fires, and have moderate tolerance to shade. Frelich (1992), in an overview of research done on various Pinus strobus communities, found that it is most abundant in forests with a catastrophic fire rotation period of 150-300 years. This coincides with the fire rotation cycle found in the BCWA in northeastern Minnesota, where Heinselman found that Pinus strobus stands remained largely intact for 150-350 years.
Fire plays an important part in the longevity of the stand. Where there is a frequent surface fire regime, the understory is eliminated by fire, establishing a pine seed bed that allows for pine regeneration (Ohmann and Ream 1971). It was suggested by Ohmann and Ream (1971) that the fire suppression in the BCWA had allowed an extremely well-developed Abies balsamea undercanopy to become established, thus hastening the successional trend towards an Abies balsamea forest.
Fire is an important natural disturbance in this community. Although Pinus strobus does not have the more sophisticated adaptations to fire that Pinus resinosa and Pinus banksiana do, Pinus strobus seedling establishment is favored by post-fire conditions, such as exposed mineral soil and high sunlight. Once established, mature Pinus strobus are able to survive surface fires, and have moderate tolerance to shade. Frelich (1992), in an overview of research done on various Pinus strobus communities, found that it is most abundant in forests with a catastrophic fire rotation period of 150-300 years. This coincides with the fire rotation cycle found in the BCWA in northeastern Minnesota, where Heinselman found that Pinus strobus stands remained largely intact for 150-350 years.
Fire plays an important part in the longevity of the stand. Where there is a frequent surface fire regime, the understory is eliminated by fire, establishing a pine seed bed that allows for pine regeneration (Ohmann and Ream 1971). It was suggested by Ohmann and Ream (1971) that the fire suppression in the BCWA had allowed an extremely well-developed Abies balsamea undercanopy to become established, thus hastening the successional trend towards an Abies balsamea forest.
Environmental Description: This community is found on Precambrian Shield bedrock, overlaid with sandy loam soils that are moderately well-drained and deep (>60 cm). In northeastern Minnesota, it occurs on northeast- and south-facing slopes, that are moderate to steep (slope ranges between 4-45%) (Ohmann and Ream 1971). The midcontinental climate in which this community is found is highly variable, with temperature extremes between -46.7°C and 38.7°C (average monthly temperature of -11.7°C in January and 17.7°C in July), and 58-91 cm annual precipitation. The soil texture is sandy to gravelly loams (Ohmann and Ream 1970). In northwestern Ontario, Pinus strobus forest was also found on silty loams, and 4 of the 21 communities sampled (or 20%) were found on lithic material (Sims et al. 1989). In northeastern Minnesota, the soil depth ranges from 61 cm to more than 1 m above the bedrock (Ohmann and Ream 1970). Sims et al. (1989) found that the thickness of the organic layer ranged between 6-15 cm for 70% of the communities sampled and 1-5 cm for the remaining 30%.
Geographic Range: This white pine forest type is found in the northern parts of the midwestern United States and in adjacent parts of Canada, ranging from Minnesota and Ontario east to Wisconsin and Michigan.
Nations: CA,US
States/Provinces: MN, ON, QC?
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.683710
Confidence Level: High
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G3G4
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.2 Cool Temperate Forest & Woodland Formation | F008 | 1.B.2 |
Division | 1.B.2.Na Eastern North American Forest & Woodland Division | D008 | 1.B.2.Na |
Macrogroup | 1.B.2.Na.6 Eastern White Pine - Jack Pine - Northern Pin Oak Forest & Woodland Macrogroup | M159 | 1.B.2.Na.6 |
Group | 1.B.2.Na.6.c Jack Pine - Red Pine - Black Spruce Subboreal Forest Group | G047 | 1.B.2.Na.6.c |
Alliance | A4130 Red Pine - White Pine Subboreal Forest Alliance | A4130 | 1.B.2.Na.6.c |
Association | CEGL002445 Eastern White Pine / Mountain Maple - Beaked Hazelnut Forest | CEGL002445 | 1.B.2.Na.6.c |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Pinus strobus / Acer spicatum - Corylus cornuta Forest (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Northern Dry-Mesic Forest White Pine / Mountain Maple Subtype]
< Dry - Fresh White Pine - Red Pine Coniferous Forest Type (Lee et al. 1998)
= White Pine (Ohmann and Ream 1971)
< Dry - Fresh White Pine - Red Pine Coniferous Forest Type (Lee et al. 1998)
= White Pine (Ohmann and Ream 1971)
- CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
- Chambers, B. A., B. J. Naylor, J. Nieppola, B. Merchant, and P. Uhlig. 1997. Field guide to forest ecosystems of central Ontario. Southcentral Science Section (SCSS) Field Guide FG-01, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, North Bay, Ontario, Canada. 200 pp.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
- Frelich, L. E. 1992. The relationship of natural disturbances to white pine stand development. Presented at the White Pine Symposium: History, Ecology, Policy and Management, Duluth, MN. September 16-18, 1992.
- Grigal, D. F., and L. F. Ohmann. 1975. Classification, description, and dynamics of upland plant communities within a Minnesota wilderness area. Ecological Monographs 45:389-407.
- Heinselman, M. L. 1973. Fire in the virgin forests of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. Journal of Quaternary Research 3:329-382.
- Hop, K., D. Faber-Langendoen, M. Lew-Smith, N. Aaseng, and S. Lubinski. [1999]. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota. USDI U.S. Geological Survey, La Crosse, WI. 210 pp.
- Hop, K., S. Menard, J. Drake, S. Lubinski, D. Faber-Langendoen, and J. Dieck. 2010b. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Grand Portage National Monument, Minnesota. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLKN/NRR-2010/200. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 202 pp.
- Hop, K., S. Menard, J. Drake, S. Lubinski, and J. Dieck. 2010a. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, Wisconsin. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLKN/NRR-2010/199. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 310 pp.
- Judziewicz, E. J., and R. G. Koch. 1993. Flora and vegetation of the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore and Madeline Island, Ashland and Bayfield counties, Wisconsin. Michigan Botanist 32:43-189.
- Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
- Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
- MNNHP [Minnesota Natural Heritage Program]. 1993. Minnesota''s native vegetation: A key to natural communities. Version 1.5. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program, St. Paul, MN. 110 pp.
- Martin, N. D. 1959a. An analysis of forest succession in Algonquin Park, Ontario. Ecological Monographs 29(3):187-218.
- Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
- Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003-2005a. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota. Three volumes: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province (2003), The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (2005c), The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces (2005b). Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
- Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
- ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
- Ohmann, L. F., and P. R. Ream. 1971. Wilderness ecology: Virgin plant communities of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Research Paper NC-63. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN. 35 pp.
- Sims, R. A., W. D. Towill, K. A. Baldwin, and G. M. Wickware. 1989. Field guide to the forest ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto. 191 pp.
- WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]