Print Report
CEGL000523 Populus tremuloides - Abies concolor / Symphoricarpos oreophilus Forest
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Quaking Aspen - White Fir / Mountain Snowberry Forest
Colloquial Name: No Data Available
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This mixed evergreen-deciduous forest is documented from the mountains and plateaus of Utah and northern Nevada at montane elevations. Stands are characterized by a moderately dense to dense tree canopy codominated by Populus tremuloides and Abies concolor with Symphoricarpos oreophilus dominating the short-shrub layer. Often the conifers form a subcanopy that will eventually overtake the Populus tremuloides. Adjacent vegetation is usually forests dominated by Abies concolor or Pseudotsuga menziesii.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: No Data Available
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: This association is characterized by a moderately dense to dense, mixed evergreen-deciduous tree canopy that is codominated by Populus tremuloides and Abies concolor. Abies lasiocarpa is typically not present, but individuals of Pseudotsuga menziesii, Picea engelmannii, Picea pungens, or Pinus ponderosa are not uncommon. Often the conifers form a subcanopy that will eventually overtake the Populus tremuloides in this early seral type. Symphoricarpos oreophilus is the characteristic species of the short-shrub layer and typically dominates. Associates include several other common species in lesser amounts such as Amelanchier spp., Arctostaphylos patula, Mahonia repens, Juniperus communis, Paxistima myrsinites, and Rosa woodsii. The moderately dense herbaceous layer is usually luxuriant and species-rich in comparison to adjacent conifer forests because light is able to penetrate the Populus tremuloides tree canopy. Herbaceous species are diverse and variable. Common graminoids are Achnatherum occidentale, Bromus anomalus, Bromus carinatus, Carex geyeri, Carex rossii, Elymus glaucus, Elymus trachycaulus, Festuca arizonica, Poa fendleriana, and Poa nervosa. Forbs may include Achillea millefolium, Eucephalus engelmannii, Frasera speciosa, Geranium spp., Lathyrus spp., Rudbeckia occidentalis, Osmorhiza berteroi (= Osmorhiza chilensis), and Thalictrum fendleri. The introduced graminoids Poa pratensis and Dactylis glomerata are common in many stands.
Dynamics: Abies concolor is much more shade-tolerant than Populus tremuloides and is the most important regenerating species under closed-canopy conditions. Most of these mixed stands are seral, in the absence of fire will eventually be dominated by Abies concolor. This unique forest alliance is linked to gap-forming disturbances, such as fire or windthrow, which allow regeneration of Populus tremuloides and limit abundances of Abies concolor (Mueggler 1988, Mueggler and Campbell 1986).
Environmental Description: These montane, mixed evergreen-deciduous forests have been reported from mountain and plateau environments of the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau, where they occur between 2100-2800 m. Sites are gently to moderately steep slopes on all aspects. Ground cover is dominated by litter, bare ground and rock. Parent materials are sedimentary (sandstone) or volcanic. Soils are generally well-drained loams or sandy loams with substantial organic matter. Past disturbance appears to be a key factor in distribution of these forests. At drier or rocky sites these forests may be somewhat stable, but in mesic areas they are seral communities which become established following fire.
Geographic Range: This forest association is widespread in the mountains of Utah and northern Nevada, and likely occurs in adjacent states where Abies concolor and Populus tremuloides co-occur.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: NV, UT
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.683658
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G4G5
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.2 Cool Temperate Forest & Woodland Formation | F008 | 1.B.2 |
Division | 1.B.2.Nb Rocky Mountain Forest & Woodland Division | D194 | 1.B.2.Nb |
Macrogroup | 1.B.2.Nb.1 White Fir - Douglas-fir - Blue Spruce Forest Macrogroup | M022 | 1.B.2.Nb.1 |
Group | 1.B.2.Nb.1.d White Fir - Blue Spruce - Douglas-fir Mesic Southern Rocky Mountain Forest Group | G225 | 1.B.2.Nb.1.d |
Alliance | A3369 White Fir Southern Rocky Mountain Mesic Forest & Woodland Alliance | A3369 | 1.B.2.Nb.1.d |
Association | CEGL000523 Quaking Aspen - White Fir / Mountain Snowberry Forest | CEGL000523 | 1.B.2.Nb.1.d |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Populus tremuloides - Abies concolor / Symphoricarpos oreophilus Community Type (Mueggler and Campbell 1986)
= Populus tremuloides - Abies concolor / Symphoricarpos oreophilus Community Type (Mueggler 1988)
= Populus tremuloides - Abies concolor / Symphoricarpos oreophilus Community Type (Mueggler 1988)
- Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
- Cogan, D., J. E. Taylor, and K. Schulz. 2012. Vegetation inventory project: Great Basin National Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/MOJN/NRR--2012/568. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 373 pp.
- Cogan, D., M. Reid, K. Schulz, and M. Pucherelli. 2004. Zion National Park, Utah 1999-2003. Vegetation Mapping Project. Technical Memorandum 8260-03-01. Remote Sensing and GIS Group Technical Service Center, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. Appendix F: Vegetation Association Descriptions for Zion.
- Mueggler, W. F. 1988. Aspen community types of the Intermountain Region. General Technical Report INT-250. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp.
- Mueggler, W. F., and R. B. Campbell, Jr. 1986. Aspen community types of Utah. Research Paper INT-362. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
- Schulz, K. A., and M. E. Hall. 2011. Vegetation inventory project: Great Basin National Park. Unpublished report submitted to USDI National Park Service, Mojave Desert Inventory and Monitoring Network. NatureServe, Western Regional Office, Boulder, CO. 30 pp. plus Appendices A-H.
- Tendick, A., B. Friesen, G. Kittel, P. Williams, J. Coles, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2011a. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Cedar Breaks National Monument. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2011/470. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
- Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.