Print Report

CEGL006355 Chamaecyparis thyoides / Rhododendron maximum Swamp Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Atlantic White-cedar / Great Laurel Swamp Forest

Colloquial Name: Atlantic White-cedar / Great Laurel Swamp Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This saturated peatland forest is dominated by Chamaecyparis thyoides with a dense shrub layer dominated by Rhododendron maximum. It occurs in southern New Hampshire, Massachusetts, southern Rhode Island and Connecticut, southeastern New York and northern New Jersey. Associated canopy trees may include Acer rubrum, Betula alleghaniensis, Tsuga canadensis, or Nyssa sylvatica. Associated shrubs are generally few and of low cover but may include Kalmia latifolia, Vaccinium corymbosum, Rhododendron viscosum, Ilex verticillata, Nemopanthus mucronatus, and Kalmia angustifolia. The herbaceous layer is generally sparse due to the dense shade cast by shrubs, but may include Trientalis borealis, Carex collinsii, Osmunda cinnamomea. Typical Sphagnum mosses include Sphagnum magellanicum, Sphagnum fallax, Sphagnum fimbriatum, Sphagnum russowii, Sphagnum recurvum.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This saturated peatland forest is dominated by Chamaecyparis thyoides with a dense shrub layer dominated by Rhododendron maximum. Associated canopy trees may include Acer rubrum, Betula alleghaniensis, Tsuga canadensis, or Nyssa sylvatica. Associated shrubs are generally few and of low cover but may include Kalmia latifolia, Vaccinium corymbosum, Rhododendron viscosum, Ilex verticillata, Nemopanthus mucronatus, and Kalmia angustifolia. The herbaceous layer is generally sparse due to the dense shade cast by shrubs, but may include Trientalis borealis, Carex collinsii, Osmunda cinnamomea. Typical Sphagnum mosses include Sphagnum magellanicum, Sphagnum fallax, Sphagnum fimbriatum, Sphagnum russowii, Sphagnum recurvum (Karlin 1988).

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  Poorly-drained, saturated basins or seasonally flooded lowlands with organic soils over sand and gravel.

Geographic Range: This association occurs in southern New Hampshire, Massachusetts, southern Rhode Island and Connecticut, southeastern New York and northern New Jersey.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CT, MA, NH, NJ, NY, RI




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G2G3

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: CEGL006396 was merged into this type (CEGL006355) on 2003-03-20 by S.L. Neid but separated out again on 2003-12-10 by L.A. Sneddon.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Chamaecyparis thyoides / Rhododendron maximum (Type 3) (Sperduto and Crowley 2002b)
< Inland Atlantic White Cedar Swamp (Breden 1989)
? SNE acidic seepage swamp, inland Atlantic white cedar association (Rawinski 1984a)

Concept Author(s): L.A. Sneddon

Author of Description: S.L. Neid

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-20-03

  • Breden, T. F. 1989. A preliminary natural community classification for New Jersey. Pages 157-191 in: E. F. Karlin, editor. New Jersey''s rare and endangered plants and animals. Institute for Environmental Studies, Ramapo College, Mahwah, NJ. 280 pp.
  • Breden, T. F., Y. R. Alger, K. S. Walz, and A. G. Windisch. 2001. Classification of vegetation communities of New Jersey: Second iteration. Association for Biodiversity Information and New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Office of Natural Lands Management, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Enser, R. W., and J. A. Lundgren. 2006. Natural communities of Rhode Island. A joint project of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Natural Heritage Program and The Nature Conservancy of Rhode Island. Rhode Island Natural History Survey, Kingston. 40 pp. [www.rinhs.org]
  • Karlin, E. 1988. Report on New Jersey conifer swamp study. Unpublished report to the New Jersey Natural Heritage Program.
  • Metzler, K. J. 1997. Identification and protection of globally significant and imperiled wetland communities in Connecticut, Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides) swamps. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, State Wetland Protection Development Grant.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 2006. The vegetation of Connecticut: A preliminary classification. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Report of Investigations No. 12. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database, Hartford, CT.
  • Motzkin, G. 1991. Atlantic white cedar wetlands of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Massachusetts. Research Bulletin 731. 53 pp.
  • Rawinski, T. 1984a. Natural community description abstract - southern New England calcareous seepage swamp. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA. 6 pp.
  • Reschke, C. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Latham, NY. 96 pp.
  • Sperduto, D. A., and K. F. Crowley. 2002b. Atlantic white cedar in New England: Analysis and proposed classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Inventory. DRED Division of Forests & Lands and The Nature Conservancy, Concord, NH.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and N. Ritter. 1994. Atlantic cedar wetlands of New Hampshire. Environmental Protection Agency, Boston, MA.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]