Invalid Unit Specified
Macrogroup Detail Report: M302
Acer rubrum - Acer negundo - Platanus occidentalis Eastern North American Ruderal Flooded & Swamp Forest Macrogroup

The U.S. National
Vegetation Classification
This wetland forest macrogroup is found in northeastern and central United States and southeastern Canada where significant disturbance has greatly altered the species composition and physiognomy of the canopy and understory. Sites are typically flooded for two or more weeks during the growing season.
Collapse All::Expand All
Translated Name:Red Maple - Box-elder - American Sycamore Eastern North American Ruderal Flooded & Swamp Forest Macrogroup
Colloquial Name:Eastern North American Ruderal Flooded & Swamp Forest
This macrogroup consists of forested wetlands throughout much of the eastern half of the United States and southern Canada north of Virginia, Tennessee, and Arkansas and east of the Great Plains. Sites where these forests are found have been extensively affected by disturbance such as logging, agricultural use, or a large change in the hydrologic regime. Sites are in depressional wetlands or along the edges of ponds, lakes or rivers. Dominant trees are early-successional native species adapted to wet conditions, especially Acer negundo (exotic in some parts of the range), Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, and Salix spp. In a few sites, exotic trees such as Acer platanoides, Salix alba, or Salix fragilis may be dominant. The understory is heavily invaded by exotic or invasive native shrub and herbaceous species, including exotics such as Berberis thunbergii (mostly in floodplains and temporarily flooded swamps), Frangula alnus (= Rhamnus frangula), Ligustrum sinense, Ligustrum vulgare, Rhamnus cathartica, and Rosa multiflora (mostly in open floodplains), with occasional generalist native species such as Cornus amomum and Cornus sericea. Herbaceous species may include the exotics Alliaria petiolata (mostly in floodplains), Barbarea vulgaris, Galeopsis spp., Glechoma hederacea, Hesperis matronalis, Hylotelephium telephium, Lysimachia nummularia, Microstegium vimineum (more in floodplains but also basin wetlands), Myosotis scorpioides, Phalaris arundinacea, Phlox paniculata, Phragmites australis, and many others. They may be mixed with very generalist native herbaceous species, such as Calamagrostis canadensis, Cirsium spp., Eupatorium spp., Galium spp., Geum canadense, Glyceria striata, Impatiens capensis, Leersia oryzoides, Solidago canadensis, Solidago rugosa, and Urtica dioica.
This macrogroup includes wetland forests in the eastern United States and southern Canada that have experienced significant hydrologic disturbance or that have been overtaken by exotic species even in the absence of disturbance. This macrogroup is distinguished by having an uneven physiognomy (canopy height, canopy cover) and an understory strongly dominated by exotic and/or invasive native plants. Dominance of these species in the understory is at least 80% relative cover. A few generalist native species may dominate the canopy, including Acer rubrum, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, and Acer negundo.
Nominals are common in this macrogroup but are also common in natural vegetation, so understory shrub and herb species are often what distinguish stands of this macrogroup from native vegetation.
Vegetation Hierarchy
Name:Database Code:Classification Code:
Class 1 Forest & Woodland C01 1
Subclass 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland S15 1.B
Formation 1.B.3 Temperate Flooded & Swamp Forest F026 1.B.3
Division 1.B.3.Na Eastern North American-Great Plains Flooded & Swamp Forest D011 1.B.3.Na
Macrogroup M302 Eastern North American Ruderal Flooded & Swamp Forest M302 1.B.3.Na.90
Group G552 Eastern North American Ruderal Flooded & Swamp Forest G552 1.B.3.Na.90.a
The current dominant native canopy species are also common in some natural/ruderal swamps. This macrogroup is distinguished by having an uneven physiognomy (canopy height, canopy cover) and an understory strongly dominated by exotic and/or invasive native plants. Only one exotic tree, Acer platanoides, is commonly found in swamps and floodplains in the northern and central United States and this is not typically dominant. It may be that few examples of floodplains have been so altered as to make them unrecognizable as some altered form of other native forest types. Clear specification of the overall set of diagnostic species is needed, not just dominants, along with altered ecological factors, and evidence that native diagnostics are essentially absent (P. Uhlig pers. comm. 2014).

The current definition of this macrogroup requires >80% cover by exotic OR native invasive shrubs and herbaceous species in the understory. This is in agreement with the current concept of ruderal macrogroups (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2014) but a more restrictive concept of the macrogroup requiring >80% relative cover by ONLY exotic shrubs and herbaceous species is favored by some.
Synonomy:

Related Type Name:

Short Citation:
  • Faber-Langendoen et al. 2017a
States/Provinces:CT, DE, IA, IL, IN, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, NB, NH, NJ, NS, NY, OH, ON, PA, PE, QC, RI, VA, VT, WI, WV
Nations:CA, US
Range:These forested wetlands are found throughout much of the eastern half of the United States and southern Canada north of a line from Virginia to Arkansas and east of the Great Plains.
US Forest Service Ecoregions
Domain Name:
Division Name:
Province Name:
Province Code:   Occurrence Status:
Section Name:
Section Code:     Occurrence Status:
These are tree-dominated wetland forests, but stands can vary from moderately open to closed (25-100% cover) and from short to tall trees. Most stands have a patchy tree canopy and thickets of shrubs. Sites that are recovering from recent extensive disturbance usually have short, young trees and an open canopy with a dense understory. Sites that have not had recent extensive disturbance have taller trees and a moderately closed to closed canopy. The understory in these stands usually thins out due to less light availability, but even most older stands in this wetland forest allow substantial light to penetrate the canopy. A moderate to vigorous shrub and tree sapling layer is typical. The herbaceous layer is extremely variable in cover but tends to have at least moderate cover due to the available light reaching the forest floor.
This macrogroup can have a wide variety of native and non-native species. Species composition varies with time since and nature of disturbance, available seed sources, and habitat characteristics, but common dominants in the tree strata are Acer negundo (exotic in parts of the range), Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Platanus occidentalis, and Salix nigra. In a few sites, exotic trees such as Acer platanoides, Crataegus spp., Salix alba, or Salix fragilis may be dominant. The understory tree Morus alba can occur on floodplains. The shrub and herb components can have generalist native species but are characterized by exotic and native invasive species providing at least 80% of the lower strata. Shrubs include exotics such as Berberis thunbergii (mostly in floodplains and temporarily flooded swamps), Frangula alnus (= Rhamnus frangula), Ligustrum sinense, Ligustrum vulgare, Rhamnus cathartica, and Rosa multiflora (mostly in floodplains), with occasional generalist native species such as Cornus amomum and Cornus sericea. Herbaceous species range from those also found in wet meadows (more common where the tree canopy allows more light through) to shade-tolerant species. Exotics include Alliaria petiolata (mostly in floodplains), Barbarea vulgaris, Galeopsis spp., Glechoma hederacea, Hesperis matronalis, Hylotelephium telephium, Lysimachia nummularia, Microstegium vimineum (more in floodplains but also basin wetlands), Myosotis scorpioides, Phalaris arundinacea, Phlox paniculata, Phragmites australis, and many others. They may be mixed with very generalist native herbaceous species such as Calamagrostis canadensis, Cirsium spp., Eupatorium spp., Galium spp., Geum canadense, Glyceria striata, Impatiens capensis, Leersia oryzoides, Solidago canadensis, Solidago rugosa, and Urtica dioica (exotic in parts of the range).
This macrogroup is found on mineral or shallow peat (<30 cm) soils that are flooded for some or all of the growing season. Soils range from coarse (often alluvial soils) to fine-textured.
Moderate
These wetland forests are more likely to be affected by further anthropogenic disturbances than natural/ruderal forests. This can include logging or tree clearing of some sort, manipulation of hydrology, continued introduction of seeds of exotic species, etc. In addition, the normal dynamics common to wetland forests can affect examples of this macrogroup. Years of higher or lower than normal precipitation, windthrow, and disease can all affect the composition and physiognomy.
Authors:
J. Drake and D. Faber-Langendoen      Version Date: 05Jun2015


References:
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2017a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]


USNVC Credits: Detailed Description of the National Vegetation Classification Types

Date Accessed:

To cite a description:
Author(s). publicationYear. Description Title [last revised revisionDate]. United States National Vegetation Classification. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Washington, D.C.

About spatial standards:
The United States Federal Geographic Data Committee (hereafter called the FGDC) is tasked to develop geospatial data standards that will enable sharing of spatial data among producers and users and support the growing National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI), acting under the Office of Management Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 (OMB 1990, 2000) and Executive Order #12906 (Clinton 1994) as amended by Executive Order #13286 (Bush 2003). FGDC subcommittees and working groups, in consultation and cooperation with state, local, tribal, private, academic, and international communities, develop standards for the content, quality, and transferability of geospatial data. FGDC standards are developed through a structured process, integrated with one another to the extent possible, supportable by the current vendor community (but are independent of specific technologies), and publicly available.

About this document
This document contains type descriptions at the Macrogroup level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. These descriptions were primarily written by NatureServe ecologists in collaboration with Federal Geographic Data Committee Vegetation Subcommittee and a wide variety of state, federal and private partners as a part of the implementation of the National Vegetation Classification. Formation descriptions were written by the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group. The descriptions are based on consultation with natural resource professionals, published literature, and other vegetation classification systems. The Ecological Society of America's Panel on Vegetation Classification is responsible for managing the review and formal adoption of these types into the National Vegetation Classification. Partners involved in the implementation of the USNVC include:

U.S. Government
  • Department of Agriculture (USDA)
  • Department of Commerce (DOC)
  • Department of Defense (DOD)
  • Department of the Interior (USDI)
  • Forest Service (FS) - Chair
  • National Agriculture Statistical Service (NASS)
  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
  • National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
  • U.S. Navy (NAVY)
  • Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
  • Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
  • National Park Service (NPS)
  • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Non U.S. Government
  • NatureServe (NS)
  • Ecological Society of America (ESA)

Disclaimer:
Given the dynamic nature of the standard, it is possible a type description is incomplete or in revision at the time of download; therefore, users of the data should track the date of access and read the revisions section of the USNVC.org website to understand the current status of the classification. While USNVC data have undergone substantial review prior to posting, it is possible that some errors or inaccuracies have remained undetected.

For information on the process used to develop these descriptions see:

Faber-Langendoen, D., T. Keeler-Wolf, D. Meidinger, D. Tart, B. Hoagland, C. Josse, G. Navarro, S. Ponomarenko, J.-P. Saucier, A. Weakley, P. Comer. 2014. EcoVeg: A new approach to vegetation description and classification. Ecological Monographs 84:533-561 (erratum 85:473).

Franklin, S., D. Faber-Langendoen, M. Jennings, T. Keeler-Wolf, O. Loucks, A. McKerrow, R.K. Peet, and D. Roberts. 2012. Building the United States National Vegetation Classification. Annali di Botanica 2: 1-9.

Jennings, M. D., D. Faber-Langendoen, O. L. Louckes, R. K. Peet, and D. Roberts. 2009. Standards for associations and alliances of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. Ecological Monographs 79(2):173-199.

FGDC [Federal Geographic Data Committee]. 2008. Vegetation Classification Standard, FGDC-STD-005, Version 2. Washington, DC., USA. [http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/vegetation/NVCS_V2_FINAL_2008-02.pdf]

For additional information contact:

  • Implementation of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification Standard - Alexa McKerrow (amckerrow@usgs.gov)
  • NatureServe's Development of NVC Type Descriptions - Don Faber-Langendoen (don_faber- langendoen@natureserve.org)
  • Ecological Society of America's Review of the Type Descriptions Scott.Franklin@unco.edu
  • Federal Geographic Data Committee - Vegetation Subcommittee's Activities - Marianne Burke (mburke@fs.fed.us)
Sean Basquill