Invalid Unit Specified
Formation Detail Report: F001
Boreal Forest & Woodland Formation

The U.S. National
Vegetation Classification
Boreal Forest & Woodland (or taiga) is dominated by needle-leaved (usually evergreen, conical-shaped) conifers, and broad-leaved deciduous hardwoods that cover the northern regions of North America and Eurasia, with extended cold winters and short mild summers.
Collapse All::Expand All
Translated Name:Boreal Forest & Woodland Formation
Colloquial Name:Boreal Forest & Woodland
Boreal Forest & Woodland (or taiga) extends across the northern regions of North America and Eurasia, with extended cold winters and short mild summers. It is bounded on the north by tundra and on the south by either the northern limit of temperate lowland and subalpine forests or grasslands (steppes). A number of ecological factors, including topography, climate and edaphic conditions, control Boreal Forest & Woodland distribution. It is dominated by needle-leaved (usually evergreen, conical-shaped) conifers, and broad-leaved deciduous hardwoods. Lichens and mosses often dominate the ground layer. The structure of Boreal Forest & Woodland varies from closed forest to lichen woodland and forest-tundra. Closed forests dominate the southern boreal zone; lichen woodlands dominate the northern regions; and isolated forest-tundra patches occur in the tundra zone near or just above treeline. Boreal forests are disturbance-based, with fires the primary disturbance.
Boreal Forest & Woodland is dominated by needle-leaved (usually evergreen, conical-shaped) conifers, and broad-leaved deciduous hardwoods, with extended cold winters and short mild summers. Tree height rarely exceeds 15 m, and may be as low as 2 m in subarctic conditions. Lichens and mosses frequently dominate the ground layer.
Vegetation Hierarchy
Name:Database Code:Classification Code:
Class 1 Forest & Woodland C01 1
Subclass 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland S15 1.B
Formation 1.B.4 Boreal Forest & Woodland F001 1.B.4
Division 1.B.4.Na North American Boreal Forest & Woodland D014 1.B.4.Na
The Braun-Blanquet approach generally recognizes the Vaccinio-Piceetea class of vegetation as synonymous with Eurasian and North American boreal and sub-boreal coniferous forests, including both upland boreal forests and forested swamps (Peinado et al. 1998, Spribille and Chytrý 2002, Kolbek et al. 2003); however, Rivas-Martinez et al. (1999b) separated the North American Boreal Forest & Woodland into a separate class, distinct from both European boreal forests and western temperate forests.

Various ecoregional treatments recognize the distinct vegetation and climate of the boreal region, compared to the temperate region. Brown et al. (1998) separates arctic-boreal from both cool-temperate and warm-temperate vegetation. Walter (1985) recognizes the boreal biome "Zonobiome of the Cold-temperate Boreal Climate" (Zone VIII), distinct from the cool-temperate biome "Zonobiome of the Temperate-Nemoral Climate" (Zone VI) and two warm-temperate biomes, the "Zonobiome of the Winter-Rain Region with an Arid-Humid Climate and Sclerophyllic Woodlands" (Zone IV) and the "Zonobiome of the Warm-Temperate Humid Climate" (Zone V).

Some authors extend the North American Boreal Forest & Woodland southward into the southern Rocky Mountains and/or Appalachian Mountains (e.g., Whittaker 1975, Brown et al. 1998, Kuennecke 2008), primarily because of the spruce-fir zones that occur in those ranges. But the more temperate climate, increasingly diverse conifer and hardwood growth forms, biogeographic patterns and distinctive species suggest that they can satisfactorily be placed in a temperate formation, where they extend up to the treeline in the subalpine regions [see also Rivas-Martinez et al. (1999b)]. However, biogeographic comparisons across larger regions, including biome or formation scales, and which can be done at the genus level and above (e.g., McLaughlin 2007), suggest a greater similarity of high-elevation Engelmann spruce-fir in the Rocky Mountains with that of the boreal. But similarities are less strong in the eastern deciduous region, where red spruce-fir forests share more species with the eastern temperate region. Chris Lea (pers. comm. 2012) notes that there are a number of subdominant species common to North American high montane/subalpine forests, North American boreal forests, and Eurasian boreal forests (a number of Vaccinium spp., Linnaea borealis, Carex aquatilis, Carex utriculata, etc.), and at least one dominant tree species (Populus tremuloides) that is common to North American high montane/subalpine and North American boreal forests. Additionally, many fauna species (lynx, pine marten, pine grosbeak, golden-crowned kinglet, crossbills, etc.) show similar species distribution patterns. But many of these species also have considerable overlap in the temperate zone. We will continue to review this issue with North American and Eurasian colleagues.
Synonomy: = Linnaeo americanae-Piceetea marianae (Rivas-Martínez et al. 1999b) [The concept of Boreal Forest & Woodland as applied within North America closely corresponds to the concept here. The authors also appear to be the first in the Braun-Blanquet tradition to recognize a distinct North American Boreal Forest & Woodland class.]
< Vaccinio-Piceetea (Peinado et al. 1998) [The authors discuss the full diagnostic floristic composition of boreal forests across the Northern Hemisphere, and then focus on North America. They extend the Boreal Forest & Woodland further south (into the temperate-montane and cool-temperate regions of western and eastern North America) than the concept provided here.]
< Boreal Forest & Woodland Biome (Kuennecke 2008) [The author provides a general introduction to the entire boreal forest, but in North America extends the concept into the Southern Rockies and Appalachian Mountains.]
= Taiga and Boreal Forest & Woodland (Elliott-Fisk 2000) [The treatment is restricted to North America.]
< Taiga or Subarctic - Subalpine needle-leaved forests: biome-type 6 (Whittaker 1975) [Whittaker combines the subalpine forests of the temperate region with boreal forests.]

Related Type Name:

Short Citation:
  • Brady and Weil 2002
  • Brandt 2009
  • Brown et al. 1998
  • Elliott-Fisk 2000
  • Faber-Langendoen et al. 2015c
  • Kolbek et al. 2003
  • Kuennecke 2008
  • Lea pers. comm.
  • McLaughlin 2007
  • Peinado et al. 1998
  • Rivas-Martínez et al. 1999a
  • Rivas-Martínez et al. 1999b
  • Spribille and Chytrý 2002
  • Walter 1985
  • Whittaker 1975
States/Provinces:
Nations:CA, US
Range:Boreal Forest & Woodland is found in North America from Greenland to Newfoundland and across northern Canada into Alaska, and in Eurasia, throughout most of Scandinavia and Russia, and parts of China, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia (Brandt 2009). It is absent from the Southern Hemisphere.
US Forest Service Ecoregions
Domain Name:
Division Name:
Province Name:
Province Code:   Occurrence Status:
Section Name:
Section Code:     Occurrence Status:
Boreal Forest & Woodland is dominated by needle-leaved (usually evergreen, conical-shaped) conifers, and broad-leaved deciduous hardwoods. Lichens and mosses often dominate the ground layer. The structure of Boreal Forest & Woodland varies from closed forest to lichen woodland and forest-tundra. Closed forests dominate the southern boreal zone; lichen woodlands dominate the northern regions; and isolated forest-tundra patches occur in the tundra zone near or just above treeline (Elliott-Fisk 2000). Boreal forests are a disturbance-based forest, with fires and insect outbreaks as primary disturbances. Tree species diversity is very low. Evergreen spruce (Picea), fir (Abies), and deciduous larch (Larix) are common, distinctive genera, as are broad-leaved deciduous aspen (Populus) and birch (Betula) (Whittaker 1975).
According to Brandt (2009), the boreal zone's northern boundary in both North America and Eurasia is generally the southern limit of the tundra; its southern boundary generally coincides with the northern limit of temperate forests, or grasslands (steppes).

Climate: There are lengthy periods of freezing temperatures with the coldest month isotherm of -3°C, and the growing season generally averaging less than 100 days, occasionally interrupted by nights of below-freezing temperatures. Snow may be present for extended periods (7-10 months) and soils are typically frozen in winter. Annual precipitation is 38-50 cm (15-20 inches). In North America, the northern boundary of the forest corresponds to the July isotherm of 13°C, with departures due to montane or maritime influences (Elliott-Fisk 2000). The southern boundary in central and eastern Canada corresponds approximately with the 18°C July isotherm, but in the west the forest border shifts to slightly cooler regions with higher precipitation (Elliott-Fisk 2000). These broad-scale climatic factors are modified by local and regional topography, climates and soils.

Brandt (2009, and Table 2 therein) characterizes the limits of boreal forests based on their dominance by "cold-tolerant" trees species, i.e., tolerant of temperatures of -80°C or lower (primarily within Abies, Larix, Picea, or Pinus but also Populus and Betula). Temperate forests are characterized by "cold-intolerant" species, i.e., they require temperatures above -45°C to survive. A number of temperate species have "intermediate cold-tolerance," common to the cool-temperate forest. Regions of the landscape where both species co-occur is sometimes referred to as the "hemiboreal subzone," that is, the northern parts of the cool-temperate zone where cold-intolerant tree species, cold-tolerant tree species, and species with intermediate cold-tolerance co-occur, and with the cold-tolerant species contributing substantially to the forest cover. Brandt's information provides the cold-tolerance limits of these species, but equally valuable in understanding the temperate versus boreal distinction would be the warm-tolerance limits. For example, in North America, Picea mariana appears to be less warm-tolerant than Pinus banksiana, but both have the same cold tolerance.

Soil/substrate/hydrology: Most boreal soils were subject to extensive glaciations (excluding parts of the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories, and Alaska). Soils are somewhat poorly to excessively drained. They are the result of podzolization, which is a consequence of low temperatures and excess precipitation above that of evapotranspiration. Soils often contain a sandy ash-colored A horizon, with an accumulation of iron and aluminum with organic matter in the B horizon. Soils are generally of low fertility, as nutrients are also removed from the upper horizons. With the low temperatures, organic matter decomposes slowly, resulting in acidic soil conditions and low nitrogen and mineral levels (Elliott-Fisk 2000, Kuennecke 2008). Permafrost is absent or typically occurs <100 cm below the surface in the Boreal Forest & Woodland zone. Spodosols are most common; Inceptisols, Histosols, and Entisols occasional (Soil Survey Staff 1999) [see Brady and Weil (2002) for a comparison of U.S. soil orders with Canadian and FAO systems].
Moderate
Ecologically, the boreal landscape is relatively young. For example, in North America, as recently as 21,400 calendar years ago at the peak of the Wisconsin glaciation, the entire boreal zone was covered with ice, excluding parts of the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories, and Alaska. With the melting of the glaciers over the next 15,000-16,000 years, the current tree species migrated northward from refugia south of the ice margin (Brandt 2009).
Authors:
D. Faber-Langendoen      Version Date: 17Oct2014


References:
  • Brady, N. C., and R. R. Weil. 2002. The nature and properties of soils. Thirteenth edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Brandt, J. P. 2009. The extent of the North American boreal zone. Environmental Review 17:101-161.
  • Brown, D. E., F. Reichenbacher, and S. E. Franson. 1998. A classification of North American biotic communities. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. 141 pp.
  • Elliott-Fisk, D. L. 2000. The taiga and boreal forest. Pages 41-73 in: M. G. Barbour and W. D. Billings, editors. North American terrestrial vegetation. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., T. Keeler-Wolf, D. Meidinger, C. Josse, A. Weakley, D. Tart, G. Navarro, B. Hoagland, S. Ponomarenko, J.-P. Saucier, G. Fults, and E. Helmer. 2015c. Classification and description of world formation types. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-000. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Kolbek, J., M. Valachoviae, N. Ermakov, and Z. Neuhäuslovä. 2003. Comparison of forest syntaxa and types in northeast Asia. Pages 409-423 in: J. Kolbek, M. Rùtek, and E. O. Box, editors. Forest vegetation of northeast Asia. Geobotany 28. Kluwer Academic Publications, London.
  • Kuennecke, B. H. 2008. Temperate forest biomes. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
  • Lea, Chris. Personal communication. Ecologist, formerly with National Park Service, USGS / NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, Denver, CO.
  • McLaughlin, S. P. 2007. Tundra to Tropics: The floristic plant geography of North America. Sida Botanical Miscellany Publication 30:1-58.
  • Peinado, M., J. L. Aguirre, and M. de la Cruz. 1998. A phytosociological survey of the Boreal Forest & Woodland (Vaccinio-Piceetea) in North America. Plant Ecology 137(2):151-202.
  • Rivas-Martínez, S., D. Sánchez-Mata, and M. Costa. 1999a. North American boreal and western temperate forest vegetation. Itinera Geobotanica 12:5-316.
  • Rivas-Martínez, S., D. Sánchez-Mata, and M. Costa. 1999b. North American new phytosociological classes. Itinera Geobotanica 13:349-352.
  • Spribille, T., and M. Chytrý. 2002. Vegetation surveys in the circumboreal coniferous forests: A review. Folia Geobotanica 37(4):365-382.
  • Walter, H., translated by O. Muise. 1985. Vegetation of the Earth and ecological systems of the geo-biosphere. Third edition. Springer-Verlag, New York. 149 pp.
  • Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and ecosystems. Second edition. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York. 387 pp.


USNVC Credits: Detailed Description of the National Vegetation Classification Types

Date Accessed:

To cite a description:
Author(s). publicationYear. Description Title [last revised revisionDate]. United States National Vegetation Classification. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Washington, D.C.

About spatial standards:
The United States Federal Geographic Data Committee (hereafter called the FGDC) is tasked to develop geospatial data standards that will enable sharing of spatial data among producers and users and support the growing National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI), acting under the Office of Management Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 (OMB 1990, 2000) and Executive Order #12906 (Clinton 1994) as amended by Executive Order #13286 (Bush 2003). FGDC subcommittees and working groups, in consultation and cooperation with state, local, tribal, private, academic, and international communities, develop standards for the content, quality, and transferability of geospatial data. FGDC standards are developed through a structured process, integrated with one another to the extent possible, supportable by the current vendor community (but are independent of specific technologies), and publicly available.

About this document
This document contains type descriptions at the Formation level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. These descriptions were primarily written by NatureServe ecologists in collaboration with Federal Geographic Data Committee Vegetation Subcommittee and a wide variety of state, federal and private partners as a part of the implementation of the National Vegetation Classification. Formation descriptions were written by the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group. The descriptions are based on consultation with natural resource professionals, published literature, and other vegetation classification systems. The Ecological Society of America's Panel on Vegetation Classification is responsible for managing the review and formal adoption of these types into the National Vegetation Classification. Partners involved in the implementation of the USNVC include:

U.S. Government
  • Department of Agriculture (USDA)
  • Department of Commerce (DOC)
  • Department of Defense (DOD)
  • Department of the Interior (USDI)
  • Forest Service (FS) - Chair
  • National Agriculture Statistical Service (NASS)
  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
  • National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
  • U.S. Navy (NAVY)
  • Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
  • Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
  • National Park Service (NPS)
  • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Non U.S. Government
  • NatureServe (NS)
  • Ecological Society of America (ESA)

Disclaimer:
Given the dynamic nature of the standard, it is possible a type description is incomplete or in revision at the time of download; therefore, users of the data should track the date of access and read the revisions section of the USNVC.org website to understand the current status of the classification. While USNVC data have undergone substantial review prior to posting, it is possible that some errors or inaccuracies have remained undetected.

For information on the process used to develop these descriptions see:

Faber-Langendoen, D., T. Keeler-Wolf, D. Meidinger, D. Tart, B. Hoagland, C. Josse, G. Navarro, S. Ponomarenko, J.-P. Saucier, A. Weakley, P. Comer. 2014. EcoVeg: A new approach to vegetation description and classification. Ecological Monographs 84:533-561 (erratum 85:473).

Franklin, S., D. Faber-Langendoen, M. Jennings, T. Keeler-Wolf, O. Loucks, A. McKerrow, R.K. Peet, and D. Roberts. 2012. Building the United States National Vegetation Classification. Annali di Botanica 2: 1-9.

Jennings, M. D., D. Faber-Langendoen, O. L. Louckes, R. K. Peet, and D. Roberts. 2009. Standards for associations and alliances of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. Ecological Monographs 79(2):173-199.

FGDC [Federal Geographic Data Committee]. 2008. Vegetation Classification Standard, FGDC-STD-005, Version 2. Washington, DC., USA. [http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/vegetation/NVCS_V2_FINAL_2008-02.pdf]

For additional information contact:

  • Implementation of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification Standard - Alexa McKerrow (amckerrow@usgs.gov)
  • NatureServe's Development of NVC Type Descriptions - Don Faber-Langendoen (don_faber- langendoen@natureserve.org)
  • Ecological Society of America's Review of the Type Descriptions Scott.Franklin@unco.edu
  • Federal Geographic Data Committee - Vegetation Subcommittee's Activities - Marianne Burke (mburke@fs.fed.us)
Ken Baldwin, Chris Lea